Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Jurnal HAM JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC OF MANDALIKA (JSM)
Adrianus Yohanes Mai
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Populism, Radical Democracy, and the Indonesian Process of Democratization Madung, Otto Gusti Ndegong; Mai, Adrianus Yohanes
Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Vol 13, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Politik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/politika.13.1.2022.131-148

Abstract

This paper discusses the ideas of populism as highlighted by Mouffe and Laclau to analyze its relevance for Indonesian democracy context. Populism is a political style which is a source for change based on the systematic use of rhetorical appeal to the people. This research focuses on populism in relation to democracy which brings forth left and right-wing populism. The concept of populism in general leads us to look at the fact of populism in Indonesia democracy context. Some crisis such us economic crisis, poverty, inequality and the failure of the government in looking after the common will and the common good of people lead to create a ‘populist moment’ particularly in Indonesia context. Therefore, radical democracy and left populism of Chantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau which this research is focusing on, offers some relevant suggestions to enhance the democratic participation of the people to overcome some crises in Indonesia democracy, which is mostly being co-opted by predatory oligarchy. 
Ende Rahim Pancasila: Embrio Pancasila dalam Nilai-nilai Budaya Masyarakat Ende-Lio Adrianus Yohanes Mai; Amandus Benediktus Seran Klau; Otto Gusti Ndegong Madung
Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 6 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36312/10.36312/vol6iss6pp1615-1625

Abstract

Pancasila is the crystallization of the values of culture, religion and customs of the Indonesian nation. Knowing the history of its birth and also the socio-cultural bedground are essential to fully understand Pancasila. Ende is a historical place because it was in this place where Sukarno contemplated the Indonesian values that was revealed in Pancasila. This study analyzes how the values of the Ende-Lio cultural community as the embryo of the birth of Pancasila. The method used in this study is a qualitative ethnographic method in which five points of Pancasila are analyzed based on the cultural values of the Ende-Lio community. Based on this study, it can be concluded that every item of Pancasila is basically contained in the cultural values of the Ende-Lio community.
Pedasaran Filsafat Hak Asasi Manusia Menurut Höffe and Lohmann Madung, Otto Gusti Ndegong; Mai, Adrianus Yohanes; Mere, Winibaldus Stefanus
Jurnal HAM Vol 16, No 1 (2025): April Edition
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2025.16.1-10

Abstract

This article aims to philosophically justify the universality and the existence of human rights. Historically, the concept of human rights has evolved according to the context in which human rights are lived. One of the themes of debate is how human rights are justified or validated and how they can be universally accepted. Philosphers always have different opinions about what constitutes the basis of human rights. This article considers Höffe and Lohmann who sepciafically address this problem. Based on the philosophical approaches of Otfried Höffe and Georg Lohmann, this research emphasizes the universal validity of human rights. On the one hand, Otfried Höffe justifies the necessity of human rights in his anthropological approach of “transcendental exchange” which is the conditions for the possibility of being human. These conditions concern humans as physical and living beings, as linguistic and rational beings, and as social and cooperative beings who have transcendent interests in their lives. On the other hand, Georg Lohmann grounds human rights through a mutual moral obligation to recognize others as equal subjects.  Moral obligation arises from a person’s ability to decide what is good or bad. Both Höffe and Lohmann ground human rights on reciprocity. In analyzing both views of human rights, qualitative method is used in this research which focuses on literature study. This research finds that the universal nature of human rights is grounded in human vulnerability, reciprocity of mutual respect, and integration of moral obligations into legal frameworks for the protection of self-determination and dignity.
Co-Authors Amandus Benediktus Seran Klau Mere, Winibaldus Stefanus Otto Gusti Ndegong Madung