Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Pancasila dalam Pusaran Diskursus Liberalisme versus Komunitarisme Madung, Otto Gusti
Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora Vol 13, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : UIN Antasari

Abstract: This paper attempts to show that a democratic order is not built onthe procedural ethics as assumed by liberals, but it is required a substantiveethical foundation. The reason is the democratic system is not contained ofatomistic individuals without social relations. A democratic process always movesin a society characterized by social relations and the various formation pro-cesses of complex communities. Democracy is built on formal yet fragilecollective identity. In the context of Indonesia, Pancasila is an expression of thecollective identity. As a collective identity, Pancasila has no ends and always inthe process of being and find themselves in a new way. At the end of thepaper, two methods; deliberative and agonistic democracy method are pre-sented. These methods are offered by contemporary political philosophy inresolving conflicts of value in the middle of pluralism.

PARADIGMA HOLISME HEGELIAN DAN KRITIK ATAS LIBERALISME Madung, Otto Gusti
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol 2 No 2 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (343.706 KB)

Liberal political ideology that promotes the democratization agenda and the implementation of human rights is seen as a normative goal of global political developments today. But liberalism does not actually escape from various critics. One radical criticism against liberalism derived from the communitarian camp that liberalism tends to privatize the concept of good life (religion, ideology) and put it in the private sphere. An important result or this is the lack of social solidarity. This paper tries to sharpen the criticism of the communitarian camp over liberalism with the knife of the Hegelian concept of holism. In liberal political theory, integralism or holism is criticized as the cause of totalitarian political systems. In this description will be shown that integralism or holism should not be contrary to the principles of individual rights. Holism or integralism suggests some fundamental criticisms of liberalism and proposes some solutions to overcome the problem of pathology of liberalism.

PANCASILA DALAM PUSARAN DISKURSUS LIBERALISME VERSUS KOMUNITARISME Madung, Otto Gusti
Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora Vol 13, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Abstract: This paper attempts to show that a democratic order is not built onthe procedural ethics as assumed by liberals, but it is required a substantiveethical foundation. The reason is the democratic system is not contained ofatomistic individuals without social relations. A democratic process always movesin a society characterized by social relations and the various formation pro-cesses of complex communities. Democracy is built on formal yet fragilecollective identity. In the context of Indonesia, Pancasila is an expression of thecollective identity. As a collective identity, Pancasila has no ends and always inthe process of being and find themselves in a new way. At the end of thepaper, two methods; deliberative and agonistic democracy method are pre-sented. These methods are offered by contemporary political philosophy inresolving conflicts of value in the middle of pluralism.

Post-Secularism as a Basis of Dialogue between Philosophy and Religion Madung, Otto Gusti Ndegong
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 31, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.65189

This article tackles the problem of religious radicalism. Religious radicalism is here interpreted as a protest against the pathology of secularism characterized by the privatization of religion. The privatization of religion is a process in which religion is regarded as an irrational and personal element, so that it cannot play a public role. In order to meet the pathology of privatization, this article offers the paradigm of post-secularism as proposed by Juergen Habermas that opens up the possibility for religion to actively participate in the public sphere. Furthermore, this writing argues that in post-secular society characterized by the public role of religion, it is essential to build a democratic and rational dialogue between religion and philosophy, faith and reason. A bridge that connects both is public reason. This article also shows that the post-secular condition opens up opportunities for theology to promote tolerance in a pluralistic society and to strengthen the public engagement of religion. This can avoid reducing religion to private piety without public responsibility while promoting the public engagement in religion in order to liberate the marginalized and oppressed.

Constructing Modern Indonesia Based on Pancasila in Dialogue with the Political Concepts Underlying the Idea of Human Rights Otto Gusti Ndegong Madung; Winibaldus Stefanus Mere
Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights Vol 5 No 1 (2021): June 2021
Publisher : Jember University Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jseahr.v5i1.20258

This article aims to describe the role of Pancasila as an ideological basis and collective identity for the multicultural society of Indonesia. Pancasila has historically been proven to be able to unite Indonesia’s diverse peoples and cultures. Pancasila means five principles that construct the ethical basis for one common home, i.e. Indonesia. The principles are belief in one God, humanity, Indonesia’s national unity, representative democracy, and social justice for all Indonesian citizens. This article argues that in the midst of democratisation and the openness to globalisation, Pancasila needs to be re-interpreted and given a place in contemporary political discourse. It proposes that Pancasila should be read in the light of the contemporary political discourse between communitarianism and liberalism. Such a dialogue is fundamental to coping with the dogmatisation of Pancasila, which can result in the loss of its political relevance as a collective identity. Furthermore, liberalism and communitarianism are the two fundamental philosophical pillars beside socialism upon which the concept of human rights is developed. Therefore, combining Pancasila with the two philosophical concepts is very important to strengthen the role of Pancasila in promoting the idea and practices of human rights politics in Indonesia.

Post-Secularism as a Basis of Dialogue between Philosophy and Religion Otto Gusti Ndegong Madung
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 31, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.65189

This article tackles the problem of religious radicalism. Religious radicalism is here interpreted as a protest against the pathology of secularism characterized by the privatization of religion. The privatization of religion is a process in which religion is regarded as an irrational and personal element, so that it cannot play a public role. In order to meet the pathology of privatization, this article offers the paradigm of post-secularism as proposed by Juergen Habermas that opens up the possibility for religion to actively participate in the public sphere. Furthermore, this writing argues that in post-secular society characterized by the public role of religion, it is essential to build a democratic and rational dialogue between religion and philosophy, faith and reason. A bridge that connects both is public reason. This article also shows that the post-secular condition opens up opportunities for theology to promote tolerance in a pluralistic society and to strengthen the public engagement of religion. This can avoid reducing religion to private piety without public responsibility while promoting the public engagement in religion in order to liberate the marginalized and oppressed.

Relasi Agama dan Moralitas Masyarakat Postsekular Negara: Telaah atas Pemikiran Juergen Habermas Otto Gusti Madung
Millah: Journal of Religious Studies Vol. X, No. 2, Februari 2011 Reformulasi Relasi Agama-Negara
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Agama Islam Program Magister, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/millah.vol10.iss2.art4

The resurrection of religions was back felt since the early 90s. Even, the philosophy that overshaded under jargon “post-metaphysical” began to take an interest in religious issues. Juergen Habermas who called himself “religioes unmusikalisch” (not religiously gifted) made the relationship between religion and rationality in post-secular society as a main theme of his philosophical studies in recent years. Habermas built his theory upon Kantian’s thesis and criticized Kant who did not give a clear line of demarcation between religion and reason. By using an analytical tool of Schleichermacher and Derrida, this paper rejects the Habermas’ thesis and shows the close relationship between faith and reason. This paper uses method of literature research by referring to the Germanic original works of Habermas and some comments on it.

Relevansi Perdebatan Liberalisme Versus Komunitarisme Untuk Konteks Indonesia Otto Gusti Madung
Millah: Journal of Religious Studies Vol. XI, No. 2, Februari 2012 Agama dan Keadaban Publik
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Agama Islam Program Magister, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/millah.volxi.iss2.art14

The crisis of solidarity on the one hand and political identity that denies the diversity on the other hand is a big problem that plagued the nation’s center of Indonesia. This issue is trying to read in a philosophical discourse about the glass eye kommunitarism versus liberalism. The debate between these two philosophies can be drawn mazhab its relevance to the context of Indonesia. Here, Pancasila occupies a special position.

The Discoursive Perspective Of Liberalism Versus Multiculturalism Otto Gusti Ndegong Madung; Winibaldus Stefanus Mere
International Journal of Indonesian Philosophy & Theology Vol 3, No 2 (2022): December
Publisher : Asosiasi Ahli Filsafat Keilahian Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47043/ijipth.v3i2.31

This paper aims to show the limitations of the liberal viewpoint vis-à-vis overcoming the conflict between freedom of religion and belief in Indonesia. The multi-ethnic and multi-religious condition, a unique feature of Indonesian society, demonstrates that the conventional liberal framework of the concept of freedom of religion and belief is insufficient. To complete this article, the writer employs the literature research method. This research can formulate many findings: freedom of religion and belief is not only concerned with the individual. And an individual right to choose his/her faith is strongly linked to how one legitimately expresses oneself in communities based on ethnicity and/or religion. Furthermore, plurality in a multicultural society presumes acknowledging a fundamental truth that can be expressed in many ways.

Disruptions and Corporate Human Rights Responsibility Winibaldus Stefanus Mere; Otto Gusti Ndegong Madung
Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights Vol 6 No 2 (2022): December 2022
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jseahr.v6i2.34526

This article aims to examine the question of how and to what extent business entities can balance the necessities of making business profits and performing social responsibilities in spite of various disruptions encountered in a pandemic. How and to what extent should their social and human rights responsibilities be managed during the COVID-19 pandemic or a similar crisis? The relevance of these questions arises from the fact that while the main purpose of business is to make profits while providing goods, services, jobs, and sources of income to many people, various disruptions arising from policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have been posing very serious challenges to business management practices, profitability, and sustainability. These challenges may force businesses to compromise on their social and human rights responsibilities to affected stakeholders for the sake of preserving their commercial responsibilities to their shareholders. This article argues that efforts to ensure effective performance for a balanced approach between commercial responsibilities and human rights responsibilities require a corporate organizational culture that takes human rights risks as seriously as commercial risks. This means there must be an organizational attitude that maintains an unwavering commitment to respect human rights while doing business. In practice, this organizational attitude should be manifested through a clear indicator of its commitment to both â€œknow and â€œshowâ€ human rights responsibilities by way of embedding human rights policy and due diligence procedures into corporate culture. Keywords: Corporate human rights due diligence, disruptions, COVID-19, Pandemic, Business dilemma

Title

Found 26 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 26 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 26 Documents
Search