Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

The Responsibility of Coastal States Against the Ship Crash in International Strait (Malacca Strait) Femmy Asdiana; Chomariyah; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v2i1.115

Abstract

Malacca Strait is globally recognized as a strait for international shipping as mentioned in UNCLOS 1982 and is under the sovereignty of three states; Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. Seeing the position of Malacca Strait that becomes the most crowded lane of international trade and oil, it often raises problems in navigation. In addition, many rocks, corals and strong waves may increase the potential of ship wrecking, sinking, and crashes. In regard to the safety issue of shipping lane in Malacca Strait, it becomes the responsibility of the coastal states and thus, they should organize an integrated safety management among them, particularly in Malacca Strait. They are Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore. The safety assurance of shipping in Malacca Strait may increase the global economy as international oil trading and distribution is wellconducted, and finally it may increase the economy of the coastal states in Malacca Strait.
ANALISIS YURIDIS TINDAKAN SEPIHAK PENGUBAHAN THRESHOLD DEVELOPMENT TAXONOMY NEGARA BERKEMBANG ANGGOTA WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION OLEH UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE Kent Kurniawan Handi; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
to-ra Vol. 6 No. 3 (2020): Desember
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33541/JtVol5Iss2pp102

Abstract

In its efforts to protect the national economy the power of a country is not unlimited. The state, as the holder of sovereignty, must comply with the provisions of international law. As a WTO member who also ratified the GATT, Enabling Clause, Marrakesh Agreement, and Doha Declaration, United States of America should have complied with, and implemented with full commitment, all the provisions governed in these agreements. On the basis of the order issued by President Donald Trump through a memo dated July 26, 2019, on February 10, 2020 USTR announced a new development taxonomy threshold that caused Indonesia and 22 other WTO member countries with Gross National Income per capita less than US $ 12,375.-, the threshold of the World Bank's high-income countries, to involuntarily lose their status as developing countries, which resulted in these countries being deprived access to WTO’s special and differential treatment provisions. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a juridical analysis on the unilateral action taken by USTR to alter the development taxonomy threshold of WTO’s developing country members examined from the concept of "graduation" and the various provisions stipulated in WTO agreements. Seen from the concept of "graduation" development taxonomy designed by USTR contains various weaknesses and was not based on transparent and data-driven methodology, this has caused some WTO developing country members to lose their status prematurely. This unilateral action taken by the USTR also contradicted various provisions stipulated in the GATT, Enabling Clause, Marrakesh Agreement, and Doha Declaration, and was not in accordance with the WTO's noble goal of advancing the economies of developing countries.
Juridical Analysis of the Validity of the Bachelor's Degree of the 7th President of Indonesia, Joko Widodo, in a Defamation Case Study Verdinandus Kiki Affandi; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 16, No 2 (2025): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jmk.v16i2.36185

Abstract

This article examines the validity of the undergraduate diploma of Indonesia’s 7th President, Joko Widodo, within the context of defamation offenses under Indonesian criminal law. The main focus of this study is to analyze whether allegations of diploma forgery disseminated to the public can be classified as defamation, and to explore the evidentiary mechanisms in such cases. The research adopts a normative juridical approach by analyzing relevant legislation, including the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), as well as reviewing the law enforcement processes involving allegations against public officials. The findings indicate that accusations directed at the President concerning a forged diploma may constitute defamation if not supported by valid evidence. The evidentiary process in such cases involves official documents, testimonies from related parties, and digital traces of the dissemination of the allegations. This study also provides recommendations for more transparent and prudent law enforcement in addressing defamation cases in the digital era.
Kepastian Hukum Investasi Syariah dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional Indonesia Angga Poerwandiantoko; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
INTEGRASI : Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 4, No. 1 : INTEGRASI (JANUARI-JUNI 2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Maslahatul Ummah Ilal Jannah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61590/int.v4i01.285

Abstract

Perkembangan investasi syariah di Indonesia menunjukkan peningkatan yang signifikan seiring meningkatnya kesadaran masyarakat terhadap sistem keuangan berbasis syariah. Namun, dalam praktiknya investasi syariah masih menghadapi berbagai problematika terkait kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis problematika ketidakpastian hukum investasi syariah dalam sistem hukum nasional Indonesia serta bentuk harmonisasi hukum yang dapat dilakukan untuk memperkuat perlindungan hukum bagi investor. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketidakpastian hukum investasi syariah disebabkan oleh adanya dualisme antara hukum nasional dan prinsip syariah, kedudukan fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia yang belum memiliki kekuatan mengikat secara penuh, regulasi yang belum terintegrasi, lemahnya pengawasan investasi berkedok syariah, serta perkembangan investasi digital yang belum diimbangi regulasi yang memadai. Harmonisasi hukum dapat dilakukan melalui pembentukan regulasi khusus investasi syariah, penguatan pengawasan, sinkronisasi kewenangan antar lembaga, serta peningkatan literasi masyarakat.
Peranan Satgas dan TPPK dalam Permendikbudristek Nomor 46 Tahun 2023 dalam Mengatasi Diskriminasi di Lingkungan Pendidikan: Studi Kasus pada SMK Negeri 2 Padang Dimas Okta Firdaus; Wisnu Aryo Dewanto
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 12 (2025): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.3389

Abstract

The controversy surrounding the hijab requirement for non-Muslim female students at SMKN 2 Padang has garnered significant public attention. This undermines the values of tolerance, particularly in education, which plays a key role in character development, particularly for students. The legal framework outlined in Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology Regulation No. 46 of 2023, which includes the Violence Prevention and Handling Team (TPPK) and the Task Force, plays a crucial role in preventing and addressing violence in educational settings. This represents an effort by the central government to minimize similar discrimination and protect human rights values, which must be respected and upheld amidst the diversity of society.