Ishak Hariyanto, Ishak
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Mataram

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

ETIKA PSIKOANALISIS SIGMUND FREUD SEBAGAI LANDASAN KESALEHAN SOSIAL Hariyanto, Ishak
AL-TAZKIAH : Journal of Islamic Guidance and Counseling Vol 5, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Jurusan Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi IAIN Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Ethics is the important role in human life, just imagine a world without ethics and morals, then the consequences will be a world where no one has a conscience and no one will ever feel guilty or sorry for what they did or did not do.  According to Freud, he said that human is deterministic because is determined by unconscious irrational power, the unconscious motivation, biological encouragement, and instinctive encouragement. Human has always been the pursuit of perfection to get happiness and to avoid unhappiness. The purpose of this research was to describe about the psychoanalysis ethics of Sigmund Freud and to apply it in social life in order to create the social piety.  During Freud psychoanalysis as if its just in medicine, counseling and religion.  But what about the psychoanalysis ethics of Sigmund Freud are manifesting  in the structure of human personality like Id (Das Es), Ego (Das Ich), Super ego (Das Ueber Ich) were compared in the context of social piety, so it would create the dialogue between individual piety and social piety, to establish the whole system of unity and run circularly.
Exclusivity in the Name of Inclusivity: Religious Moderation in Indonesia from Utopia to Oxymora Sukri, Muhammad; Hariyanto, Ishak
MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Morality : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52947/morality.v10i2.1032

Abstract

Religious moderation is the common hope of mankind in this world; therefore, we must hate violence in any name, be it religion or humanity. We must respect, accept, respect, and uphold human values. This article explores how religious moderation as a utopian idea transformed into an oxymora-filled practice. Oxymora in the sense refers to concepts that seem to be contradictory or opposite to each other but, if examined more deeply, can produce new meanings with nuances of irony and paradox. This oxymoron can be seen in the social, political, and cultural realities in Indonesia by giving birth to the diction of "religious moderation" that aspires to inclusivity but, in reality, actually strengthens exclusivity or a certain domination. With a critical approach from Habermas' point of view, this study highlights how moderation narratives are often instrumentalized for specific interests, thus losing their communicative essence that should be inclusive and dialogical. This study also examines the role of communicative actions as formulated by Jürgen Habermas in presenting a more authentic and rational religious moderation. In this framework, religious moderation is not only understood as a normative slogan but as a dialogue process that builds consensus based on rationality, honesty, and openness between individuals and groups. The results of the study show that the failure to apply these principles often results in a form of pseudo-moderation that only deepens the polarization and dominance of power in religious discourse
TRANSFORMATION OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE HAJJ DAM FROM MAKKAH TO INDONESIA: A REVIEW OF MAQASHID SHARIA ON THE FATWA OF MUI AND MUHAMMADIYAH Fikri, Muhammad; Hariyanto, Ishak
Referensi Islamika: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): APRIL
Publisher : Academic Bright Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66053/ri.v4i2.625

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of Hajj dam (penalty sacrifice) management from Mecca to Indonesia through a maqashid al-shari‘ah analysis of the fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) and Muhammadiyah. During the period 2025–2026, a significant shift has occurred in contemporary Islamic legal discourse regarding the location of dam slaughter for tamattu‘ and qiran Hajj, amidst the institutional transformation of Indonesia’s Hajj governance following the enactment of Law Number 14 of 2025. Using a qualitative-normative approach with comparative-fatwa analysis, this study places MUI Fatwa Number 41 of 2011, which prohibits slaughter outside the Sacred Precincts, and the Muhammadiyah Tarjih Council’s 2026 fatwa, which permits it under three conditions, as the primary objects of investigation. The findings indicate that MUI’s fatwa emphasizes textual-ritual aspects by prioritizing spatial authority as an integral part of the pilgrimage rituals, while Muhammadiyah’s fatwa employs a maslahah-contextual approach emphasizing the universal objectives of shari‘ah, particularly the protection of property (hifz al-mal), life (hifz al-nafs), and environment (hifz al-bi’ah). From a maqashid al-shari‘ah perspective, the transformation of dam management to Indonesia does not yet possess a strong legal rationale (‘illah) for relocation; therefore, this study recommends the necessity of i‘adatu al-nazhar (re-examination) of the Muhammadiyah fatwa that permits the management of dam in Indonesia. This study is original in that it provides a comparative maqashid al-shari‘ah analysis of the MUI and Muhammadiyah fatwas on the relocation of Hajj dam slaughter to Indonesia, situating the debate within the contemporary transformation of Indonesia’s Hajj governance after Law Number 14 of 2025.