Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

THE EFFECT OF SCHOOL BASED MANAGEMENT TO TEACHER PROFESSIONALISM OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL IN CENTRAL LAMPUNG Sumali, Sumali
GUIDENA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Psikologi, Bimbingan dan Konseling Vol 6, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (156.037 KB) | DOI: 10.24127/gdn.v6i2.558

Abstract

This study aims to find out there is a direct effect of school-based management in the professionalism of teachers. Subjects were teachers who served in secondary schools in Central Lampung, participants were 40 teachers. The study used a survey method causal. The study proved that the school-based management influence on the professionalism of teachers. This means that peninggkatan professionalism of teachers is essentially the improvement of the quality of education within the scope of narrow and wide, can be done by increasing the school-based management.
UJI KONSTITUSIONALITAS PASAL 31 AYAT (1) B UU KEJAKSAAN DI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Sumali, Sumali
Jurnal Bestari No 38 (2008)
Publisher : Jurnal Bestari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3577.291 KB)

Abstract

This analysis focused on finding the valid and effective formulation about legal standing and the material of judicial review on the Chapter 3I Article (1) b Prosecutor Act on Constitution 1945. This analysis indicated the constitutional failure on the validity variable of legal standing of the applicant for judicial review. Hopefully it could be performed potentially and accurately. At Blitar East Java, the constitutional failure due to the application of aquo chapter occurred. Meanwhile, in term of the aqua chapter. it is found that the application was unconstitutional
PERAN HUKUM DALAM PEMULIHAN EKONOMI DI INDONESIA Sumali, Sumali
Jurnal Bestari No 34 (2002)
Publisher : Jurnal Bestari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4457.531 KB)

Abstract

Mendaulat hokum sebagai salah satu instrument recovery perekonomian satu negara adalah sesuatu yang niscaya. Pengalaman dibeberapa negara barat, Afrika, Amerika Latin maupun di kawasan Asia membuktikan bahwa pendayagunaan hokum secara valid dan efektif mempunyai kontribusi positif bagi pembangunan ekonomi. Di Indonesia sendiri, kendali memiliki sistem hukum dengan karakter modern dan berbagai produk legislasi yang sengaja disiapkan untuk mengatisipasi praktek ekonomi yang inefesien dan unfair, sejauh ini masih dipertanyakan validitas peran dan kontribusinya bagi recovery perekonomian nasional yang terbatak dihantam badai krisis justru hukum dan apparatus serta kaum prefesional hukum saat ini tengah bermasalah. Tulisan berikut mencoba mencari celah-celah ruang alternative bagi pembenahan hokum sekaligus memfungsikan sebagai instrumen recovery ekomoni di Indonesia
Evidence of Oath in Case Dispute over General Election Results in Indonesia Sumali, Sumali; Esfandiari, Fitria; Fauzia, Ana
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 10, No 6 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v10i6.35413

Abstract

In practice law proof according to laws, roles the judge's conviction had limited in a way normative with element “at least two tools evidence”. As a result, when there is one applicant in case dispute results in election general (PHPU) which turned out to be only presenting information witness as tool proof, then matter the no can process because no sufficient condition as in applicable regulations. The writing article aims to examine: 1) the authority of the Court Constitution (MK) in adjudicating PHPU; 2) the domination of PHPU cases at the Constitutional Court; 3) the aspect constitutionality of PHPU; 4) proof and tools proof in PHPU; and 5) urgency tool proof swear. The method used in this research is normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the research show that the PHPU examination by the Constitutional Court is not just a matter of calculators or quantitative numbers, but also concerns the qualitative issue of holding elections based on honesty and fairness. Therefore, the use of sworn evidence in the PHPU dispute resolution process has quite objective relevance and urgency, namely: First, because there is a possibility that the Petitioner will have difficulty or minimally present sufficient evidence, due to the relatively short time duration in the PHPU settlement; Second, the PHPU case is not a case with a purely legal dimension, but rather a political problem behind which the disputing parties at the Constitutional Court stand thousands or even millions of constituents who emotionally need honesty and justice.
Evidence of Oath in Case Dispute over General Election Results in Indonesia Sumali, Sumali; Esfandiari, Fitria; Fauzia, Ana
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol. 10 No. 6 (2023)
Publisher : SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v10i6.35413

Abstract

In practice law proof according to laws, roles the judge's conviction had limited in a way normative with element “at least two tools evidence”. As a result, when there is one applicant in case dispute results in election general (PHPU) which turned out to be only presenting information witness as tool proof, then matter the no can process because no sufficient condition as in applicable regulations. The writing article aims to examine: 1) the authority of the Court Constitution (MK) in adjudicating PHPU; 2) the domination of PHPU cases at the Constitutional Court; 3) the aspect constitutionality of PHPU; 4) proof and tools proof in PHPU; and 5) urgency tool proof swear. The method used in this research is normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the research show that the PHPU examination by the Constitutional Court is not just a matter of calculators or quantitative numbers, but also concerns the qualitative issue of holding elections based on honesty and fairness. Therefore, the use of sworn evidence in the PHPU dispute resolution process has quite objective relevance and urgency, namely: First, because there is a possibility that the Petitioner will have difficulty or minimally present sufficient evidence, due to the relatively short time duration in the PHPU settlement; Second, the PHPU case is not a case with a purely legal dimension, but rather a political problem behind which the disputing parties at the Constitutional Court stand thousands or even millions of constituents who emotionally need honesty and justice.