Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Juridical review of the comparison of remuneration policies in omnibus law with labor law number 13 of 2003 Roswita Sitompul; Kartina Pakpahan; Ferina Diamond
International Journal of Latin Notary Vol 1 No 2 (2021): Internasional Journal of Latin Notary, Vol. 1, No. 2, March 2021
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/journal.v2i2.23

Abstract

Demand is growing rapidly, but the economy is still weak, employment is limited, unemployment continues to increase. Effective regulation is needed in the recovery of various sectors of the economy. The government formed the Omnibus Law to face the challenges of the times, reduce unemployment and attract new entrepreneurs. The research method is empirical law. The research characteristic is descriptive analysis with qualitative research. The research shows that the omnibus law was formed because the government felt there was a lack of implementation of policies by Law Number 13 of 2003, especially the provision of severance pay so that there were still widespread differences in interests between workers and employers. As a result, many people do not dare to start a business. The difference in remuneration arrangements in Omnibus Law is arrangements for workers' severance pay and compensation for contract workers. The time limit for contract workers is a maximum of 3 (three) years of work being changed to 5 (five) years and extended to a maximum of 5 (five) years. The advantages of Omnibus Law are mobilization of the investment climate and employment opportunities, providing compensation for workers, increasing overtime wages. Lack of public participation in the formation of laws, and weak legal transparency make rejection of workers who feel disadvantaged by the lack of severance pay, the elimination of district/city minimum wages, and wages during leave. Hope that government will form regulations openly and pay attention to workers' rights without prejudice to common interests.
REALISASI PEMBAGIAN HARTA WARISAN KEPADA AHLI WARIS YANG MELEPASKAN HAK WARIS SECARA PAKSA Michelle Hadlen; Roswita Sitompul; Kartina Pakpahan
SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Vol. 2 No. 8 (2023): July
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sibatik.v2i8.1251

Abstract

The background of this research is that a will is considered void if it is made under threat or fraud. Threats or fraud can be carried out by parties who want to threaten by alternatively asking the heirs to refuse inheritance or by releasing inheritance rights. The heir who refuses the inheritance is considered never to be an heir because if he dies earlier than the heir, he cannot be replaced by his children who are still alive. The legal research method used in this research is normative juridical research which is research conducted or aimed only at written regulations with the nature of analytical descriptive research which is a method that functions to describe or give an overview of the object under study through data or samples and make general conclusions. Sources of data used in this study are primary and secondary data and analysis of qualitative data which is an observation of phenomena obtained from the data obtained in the form of descriptions, verbal information stated by sources in writing or orally. The result of this research is that provisions for the release of inheritance rights based on the Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek) are regulated in 1057 to 1065 Burgerlijk Wetboek. In Article 1057 Burgerlijk Wetboek states that refusal must be expressly stated in a statement made by the clerk of the District Court in the area where the inherited property is located. Article 1058 Burgerlijk Wetboek states that heirs who refuse inheritance are considered not considered heirs. Article 1059 Burgerlijk Wetboek states that the portion of the inheritance from the person who refuses the inheritance falls into the hands of the person receiving the inheritance. The provisions of the law regarding heirs who are forced to relinquish their inheritance rights are regulated in Article 1065 which states that no one can be fully recovered from refusal of an inheritance, unless the refusal occurs due to fraud or coercion. Settlement of disputes by heirs if coercion occurs can be carried out through litigation, namely through an Unlawful Act lawsuit to the District Court in the area where the inheritance is located.
IMPLEMENTASI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH ADAT DI MATARAM (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR : 2884 K/Pdt/2022) Jovina; Roswita Sitompul; Kartina Pakpahan
SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Vol. 2 No. 8 (2023): July
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sibatik.v2i8.1283

Abstract

Land is seen as something very valuable and must be maintained by indigenous peoples. This can be seen in the life of the Indonesian people in each area of ​​residence and apart from the Indonesian people, land also has an impact on the government, in which case the government has the authority to control the land in use and allotment to the community. The research method used is in the form of normative juridical which is viewed from the UUPA, government regulations related to the same matter as well as literature studies and the type of data used is the Mataram District Court Decision Number 36/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Mtr, Mataram High Court Decision Number 231/PDT/2021/PT.MTR, and Court Decision Number 2884K/Pdt/2022 and reviewed based on customary law in Mataram. The results of this study are in the Cassation Decision Number 2884 K.Pdt/2022, it has been proven that PT Pertamina is the owner of the customary disputed land which was originally claimed to belong to the Plaintiff, namely the families of Ida WJ Gedok and Ida Nyoman Oka, but because the evidence they have is Proof of Garuda Pipil or Temporary Registration Certificate that is not re-registered so that it cannot be used as legal evidence because it is no longer valid.
PROBLEMATIKA PENGALIHAN PIUTANG BANK SECARA CESSIE TERHADAP DEBITUR (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 142/PDT.G/2022/PN MDN) Gladys Fiona Tantiani; Roswita Sitompul; O.K. Isnainul
SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Vol. 2 No. 9 (2023): August
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sibatik.v2i9.1301

Abstract

Cessie is the transfer of receivables collection rights in the name and other intangible objects carried out by authentic deed or deed under hand. In Cessie the right to collect receivables is transferred to new creditors but District Court's ruling in case No. 142/PDT.G/2022/PNMDN gives the plaintiff the right to sell the collateral. Legal research is normative legal research. The data used are primary and secondary data obtained through interviews and literature studies. The data is analyzed qualitatively. The problems are the legal consequences of transferring Bank receivables cessie to new creditors, the judge's considerations in Decision Number 142/Pdt.G/2022/PNMdn, and legal protection of debtors and the implementation of the Decision Number 142/Pdt.G/2022/PNMdn. The consequence of transferring bank receivables by cessie is not only the right to collect receivables is transferred but the rights of creditors as holders of collateralized rights also transfer to new creditors. The execution of the debtor’s guarantee must be in accordance with applicable regulations, the creditor can’t necessarily own the collateral. It needs clearer regulation regarding the consequences of transferring bank receivables cessie in particular against the guarantee of liability. So, the regulation can provide legal protection and certainty for both cessus, cedent, and cessionaris.
Enhancing Competence and Legal Safeguards for Foreign Medical Professionals under the ASEAN Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA): A Case Study of Indonesia Roswita Sitompul; Tommy Leonard; Kartina Pakpahan; Thela Valentine; Merry Roseline Pasaribu
Khazanah Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2023): Khazanah Hukum Vol 5, No 2 August (2023)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v5i2.28721

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation of the medical profession in Indonesia in implementing the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA), as well as the legal response to violations by foreign doctors and the government's efforts to increase the competitiveness of ASEAN foreign doctors in MRA professional standards. The normative-empirical method is used by collecting data through field studies, literature studies, and qualitative analysis. The results of the study show that a number of regulations including the Medical Practice Act, the Health Law, and the Presidential Decree regarding foreign workers governs the regulation of the medical profession in Indonesia related to MRA. The government is also trying to increase the competitiveness of foreign doctors by providing quality health infrastructure and creating a conducive investment climate. Legal responsibility for foreign doctors' violations of the medical profession includes civil, criminal and administrative aspects. This research provides insight into legal protection for the medical profession in the implementation of MRA and emphasizes the importance of government steps in increasing the competence of foreign doctors to maintain professional standards in the ASEAN context.