Muhammad Yusuf Siregar
Faculty of Law, Labuhanbatu University

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Implementation of Savings and Loans Business in Village-Owned Enterprises (Bumdes) Based on Government Regulation Number 11 of 2021 Concerning Village-Owned Enterprises Iwan Pane; Muhammad Yusuf Siregar; Wahyu Simon Tampubolon
Journal of Social Research Vol. 1 No. 12 (2022): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i1.406

Abstract

Background: The seriousness of the Government in building social welfare is evidenced by the creation of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages. In the mandate of Law Number 6 of 2014 regarding Villages, the Government has created a program to alleviate poverty. Namely, the establishment of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) is a village-owned enterprise established by the village government whose capital, the village government, and the community carry out ownership and management. The existence of BUMDes is expected to move the wheels of the economy in the village. Objective: This research belongs to the normative type of research. So it can be known that the implementation of credit agreements with Village-Owned Enterprises (Bumdes) in Indonesia allows economic turnover in villages where there are Village-Owned Enterprises. Method: This research belongs to the normative type of research. So it can be known that the implementation of credit agreements with Village-Owned Enterprises (Bumdes) in Indonesia allows economic turnover in villages where there are Village-Owned Enterprises. Result: It can be said that the creditor in the credit relationship with the debtor within the time and conditions mutually agreed upon can return or repay the credit in question. Conclusion: Based on the results of research and discussion, the implementation of credit agreements with Village-Owned Enterprises (Bumdes) in general in Indonesia, it is allowed for an increase in economic turnover in villages where there are Village-Owned Enterprises.
The Implementation of Law Enforcement Against Criminal Acts of Mobbing Against Persons is Reviewed by Article 170 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code Prihartono Prihartono; Muhammad Yusuf Siregar; Wahyu Simon Tampubolon; Risdalina Risdalina
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i1.492

Abstract

Background: Indonesia is a country of law, the statement contained in the Explanation of the 1945 Constitution states that "The State of Indonesia is based on the law (rechtstaat) not based on mere power (machtstaat)". Objective: This study aims to find out and analyze the implementation of article 170 paragraph (2) 1 of the Criminal Code concerning criminal acts with joint energy committing violence against people. As well as knowing and analyzing the liability of criminal acts of mobbing in criminal law Methods: This research belongs to the normative type of research. So that it can be known that the liability of the criminal act of mobbing according to criminal law depends on the category of mobbing itself (Article 170 of the Criminal Code). Result: If the act is committed overtly and with concerted force using force against persons or goods is punished with imprisonment for not more than five years and six months, and if it results in injuries is subject to a maximum sentence of seven years. Burglary if violence results in serious injury are punishable by a maximum of nine years imprisonment. If violence results in death are subject to a maximum of twelve years. Conclusion: Based on the above explanation, it can be concluded that the liability of the criminal act of mobbing according to criminal law depends on the category of mobbing itself (Article 170 of the Criminal Code).
Analysis of Examination of Evidence Through the Scientific Crime Investigation Method in the Disclosure of Homicide Crimes Hefa Ruspita; Muhammad Yusuf Siregar; Wahyu Simon Tampubolon; Risdalina Risdalina
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i1.493

Abstract

Background: Law enforcement is one of the efforts to create order, security, and peace in the community, especially enforcement after violations of the law. Objective: This study aims to find out and analyze the strengthening of evidence through scientific crime investigation in homicide crimes. As well as knowing and analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of using the scientific crime investigation method in crime scene processing carried out by the forensic laboratory. Methods: This research belongs to the normative type of research. So that it can be known that the scientific crime investigation method is used in proving the crime of forensic murder. Result: Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code has restrictively regulated valid evidence according to the law. Apart from the aforesaid evidence, it is not justifiable to be used to prove the wrongs committed by the accused. Judges, public prosecutors, defendants, and legal counsel, are limited and bound to use evidence by the rules of criminal procedure only. Evidence using evidence other than the evidence provided in Article 184 paragraph (1) has no binding evidentiary force value. Conclusion: Based on the explanation above, it can be concluded that the scientific crime investigation method is used in proving the crime of forensic murder
The Existence of Proof of Criminal Liability for Food Poisoning is Reviewed Under the Law Number 18 of 2012 Concerning Food Heru Susanto; Muhammad Yusuf Siregar; Wahyu Simon Tampubolon; Abdul Hakim
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i1.494

Abstract

Background: Developments in the economy, trade, and industry are increasing day by day, this has also given its enjoyment to every consumer because of the large variety of products presented. Objective: This study aims to find out and analyze the criminal responsibility for food poisoning based on law number 18 of 2012 concerning food. As well as knowing and analyzing the existence of evidence against the criminal act of food poisoning. Methods: This research belongs to the normative type of research. So that it can be known that the criminal responsibility for food poisoning is the responsibility of business actors regulated in Article 19 paragraphs (1) and (2) of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Result: Criminal liability of business actors related to food poisoning is regulated in Article 134 of Law Number 18 of 2012 concerning Food. Furthermore, the proof of the criminal act of food poisoning is that the investigator uses the proof process by taking test results from doctors and labs, visual results, and information from consumers who are victims of food poisoning then reprocessing through the help of BPOM. Conclusion: Based on the conclusion of the criminal liability for food poisoning, the responsibility of business actors are regulated in Article 19 paragraphs (1) and (2) of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection.