Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science
Afifah Kusumadara
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Application of Article 20 of Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Protection of Personal Data in Company E-Commerce As a Personal Data Controller in Processing Personal Data (Case Study at PT. Bukalapak.com Tbk) Tio Reza Aditya Cholid; Afifah Kusumadara; Patricia Audrey
Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 04 (2024): Upcoming issues, Asian Journal of Management Entrepreneurship and Social Scien
Publisher : Cita Konsultindo Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Protection of individual personal data has become part of the state's constitutional obligations which have been regulated in Article 28G paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, and the Republic of Indonesia has made efforts by passing Law number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection . Provisions regarding the mechanism and technicalities of positive consent are not yet clearly regulated in the Personal Data Protection Law, but this has been regulated in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) which applies in Europe, which is the reference for the Indonesian Government in drafting the Personal Data Protection Law. The obstacle faced by Bukalapak in implementing article 20 is because there are no technical instructions issued by the government, either in the form of statutory regulations or through training or seminars.
LEGITIMACY OF IMMEDIATE EXECUTABLE JUDGMENT (UITVOERBAAR BIJ VOORRAAD) IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT Gerry Geovant Supranata Kaban; Afifah Kusumadara; Dhia Al Uyun
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): March
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2702

Abstract

The immediate executable judgment (uitvoerbaar bij voorraad) is a form of judgment in civil procedural law that can be executed first, even though it does not yet have permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde). In the context of small claims court, the issuance of an immediate executable judgment raises questions regarding its legitimacy and implications for the principles of justice and legal certainty. This research aims to analyze the legitimacy of issuing immediate executable judgment in small claims court cases through juridical aspects. The research method used is normative juridical with a normative legal research approach and a conceptual approach. The data used includes relevant legal regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal literature. The research results indicate that judges have the authority and legitimate legitimacy to issue immediate executable judgment when examining, adjudicating, and deciding small claims court cases while still adhering to the strict terms and conditions outlined in Article 180 paragraph (1) of the HIR and Article 191 paragraph (1) of the RBg junctis SEMA Number 3 of 2000 concerning Immediate Executable Judgment (Uitvoerbaar bij Voorraad) and Provisional, to ensure aspects of legal certainty, usefulness, and justice.
Co-Authors Dhia Al Uyun Gerry Geovant Supranata Kaban Patricia Audrey Tio Reza Aditya Cholid