Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.259
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Science and Education (JSE) UNES Journal of Swara Justisia International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Al-Muamalat : Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences
Dhia Al Uyun
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
RAW Pemutusan Akses Terhadap Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik Lingkup Privat yang Tidak Terdaftar dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Achmad, Rinalvin; Istislam, Istislam; Dhia Al Uyun
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 3 No 6 (2024): IJHESS JUNE 2024
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.1003

Abstract

The policy of terminating access to Private Scope Electronic System Operators, to several internet platforms including: Paypal, Yahoo, Epic Games, Steam, Dota, Counter Strike, Xandr.com, and Origin, which occurred on July 30, 2022. The government's policy in terminating access to unregistered private scope electronic system operators has resulted in material and immaterial losses to citizens who use the platform of unregistered private scope electronic system operators. This research uses normative legal research method, that using a statutory, conceptual, and cases approach to analyze issues related to the termination of access to unregistered Private Scope PSEs. This research concludes that the government's policy of terminating access to unregistered private electronic system operators is contrary to human rights regulation. These rights include the right to access, communicate and obtain information and the right to an economy for citizens who are harmed by the termination of access to unregistered private scope electronic system operators.
Kedudukan Saksi Instrumen di Pengadilan Istiqomah, Ira Nur; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Dhia Al Uyun
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (April 2024)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/8fxk3695

Abstract

Notaris adalah pejabat publik yang berhak berwenang dalam membuat akta autentik, sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Salah satu syarat akta autentik adalah adanya saksi, yaitu saksi instrumen, saksi instrumen sebagai orang yang diwajibkan untuk hadir pada saat suatu peristiwa untuk menyaksikan, sehingga bila diperlukan dapat memberikan keterangannya yang membenarkan jika peristiwa tersebut benar terjadi. Terkait dengan hukum saksi instrumen ialah saksi dalam akta notaris yang ikut serta dalam hal pembuatan terjadinya akta yang dibuat notaris, saksi tersebut yang nama-namanya dicantumkan dalam akta notaris. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji urgensi pengaturan hukum saksi instrumen di pengadilan dan kedudukan saksi instrumen di pengadilan. Kedudukan saksi instrumen tidak diatur dalam suatu bentuk peraturan, dimana kedudukan saksi sangat penting dalam akta yang dibuat oleh notaris. Karena saksi turut dipanggil ke persidangan untuk memberikan keterangannya dalam hal akta yang dibuat oleh notaris di perkarakan oleh para pihak. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statue approach) dan pendekatan secara konseptual (Conseptual Approach). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian saksi instrumen dalam akta notaris belum diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Saksi instrumen akan ikut terkena proses penyidikan dan dipanggil untuk dimintai keterangannya. Notaris mempunyai hak ingkar sehingga ia bebas untuk tidak hadir dalam proses pemanggilan terkait akta yang dibuatnya. Sedangkan saksi tidak ada suatu aturan yang mengatur kedudukan, hak dan kewajiban nya sebagai saksi. Tidak diatur nya kedudukan saksi instrumen menimbulkan kekosongan norma hukum, diperlukan pembentukan norma baru, norma ini disebut sebagai ius constituendum atau lege ferenda mengenai hukum yang akan dicita-citakan kelak.
The Model of Simultaneous General Elections in Order To Realize Democratic Elections: Analytical Study of The Decision of The Constitutional Court No. 55/PUU-XVII/2019 Nuri Vina Mawaddah; Tunggul Anshari S. N; Dhia Al Uyun
Journal of Science and Education (JSE) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Science and Education (JSE) IN PRESS
Publisher : CV. Media Digital Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58905/jse.v6i1.575

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the implementation of the 2019 simultaneous general elections (elections), which actually caused various problems in practice. Responding to these dynamics, the Association for Elections and Democracy (Perludem) submitted a judicial review of the Election Law to the Constitutional Court, which then resulted in Constitutional Court Decision Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019 . This research is based on two main questions. First, how is the simultaneous general election model as stated in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019 analysed in terms of the basic principles of democratic elections? Second, how is the ideal simultaneous general election model after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019 In answering these questions, this research is supported by normative legal research methods (doctrinal) with three approaches, namely the legislative approach, conceptual approach, and historical approach analysed prescriptively analytically. Based on the results of the research and analysis conducted, the following conclusions were drawn: First, with the birth of Constitutional Court Decision No. 55/PUU-XVII/2019 6 variants of the simultaneous election model. In the analysis used, the constitutional judges used historical interpretation and functional interpretation methods in deciding the constitutional simultaneous election model. Second, Constitutional Court Decision Number 55/PUU-XVII/2019 affirms the significance of Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 in the context of simultaneous general election arrangements. The idea of holding elections with five ballot boxes is actually not the only model that has developed in the discourse on amending the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The Constitutional Court has explicitly formulated six alternative models of simultaneous elections that are considered to remain in line with constitutional principles. Among these alternatives, the fourth model is considered the most ideal to be implemented in the future simultaneous election system, given its conformity with the principles of effectiveness, efficiency and accountability in organising democratic elections.
BLOCKING ACCESS POLICY OF UNREGISTERED PRIVATE ELECTRONIC SYSTEM OPERATORS IN HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE Rinalvin Achmad Wiryawan; Istislam; Dhia Al Uyun
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): January
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v4i1.1452

Abstract

The decision of the Panel of Judges in the State Administrative Court Decision at the Jakarta State Administrative Court Number 424/G/TF/2022/PTUN.JKT, contradicts with many human rights law, especially related to the right to communicate and obtain information and economic rights. The right to communicate and to access and obtain information is a right guaranteed and recognized by the Indonesian Constitution as stipulated in Article 28F of the 1945 Constitution, and regulated in Articles 14 of the Human Rights Act. In addition, the right to communicate and obtain information is also regulated internationally in the provisions of Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which has been ratified in the provisions of the Law Number 12 of 2005 concerning the Ratification of the ICCPR (KIHSP Law). The right to economy and employment is a human right guaranteed in the Indonesian constitution, as stipulated in Article Article 27 paragraph (2) UUD NRI Tahun 1945, and regulated internationally in the provisions of Article 1 Number 2, Article 5 paragraph (2), and Article 6 of International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) that has been ratified in the provisions of Law Number 11 of 2005 concerning the Ratification of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (KIHESB Law).
LEGITIMACY OF IMMEDIATE EXECUTABLE JUDGMENT (UITVOERBAAR BIJ VOORRAAD) IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT Gerry Geovant Supranata Kaban; Afifah Kusumadara; Dhia Al Uyun
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): March
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2702

Abstract

The immediate executable judgment (uitvoerbaar bij voorraad) is a form of judgment in civil procedural law that can be executed first, even though it does not yet have permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde). In the context of small claims court, the issuance of an immediate executable judgment raises questions regarding its legitimacy and implications for the principles of justice and legal certainty. This research aims to analyze the legitimacy of issuing immediate executable judgment in small claims court cases through juridical aspects. The research method used is normative juridical with a normative legal research approach and a conceptual approach. The data used includes relevant legal regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal literature. The research results indicate that judges have the authority and legitimate legitimacy to issue immediate executable judgment when examining, adjudicating, and deciding small claims court cases while still adhering to the strict terms and conditions outlined in Article 180 paragraph (1) of the HIR and Article 191 paragraph (1) of the RBg junctis SEMA Number 3 of 2000 concerning Immediate Executable Judgment (Uitvoerbaar bij Voorraad) and Provisional, to ensure aspects of legal certainty, usefulness, and justice.
Legal Protection of Instrument Witnesses in Maintaining the Secret Position Notary Ira Nur Istiqomah; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Dhia Al Uyun
Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani Vol. 3 No. 8 (2023): August, 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/mudima.v3i8.5524

Abstract

Notary as an official who is legally authorized to make official deeds, in accordance with the provisions in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the office of notary. A requirement that must be met to make an authentic deed is the presence of witnesses. This witness is a person who is present when an event occurs and has the ability to provide information that can prove that the event actually occurred. An instrument witness is a person who is present in the process of making a deed by a notary, where his name is also recorded in the deed. This study aims to analyze how the legal rules regulate and protect the confidentiality of information from instrument witnesses in maintaining the confidentiality of the notarial deed they witnessed. To protect them from possible undesirable consequences, there needs to be legal protection given to witnesses in the process of making notarial deeds. This is important because witnesses are often involved in problems or disputes that arise in relation to the documents they witness. In order for witnesses not to be victimized or further involved in the case, legal protection must be guaranteed to ensure that they will not be harmed due to their role as witnesses in the notarial deed. This research applies a normative legal research method using a statue approach. There are no clear provisions regarding the legal rules of instrument witnesses in notarial deeds based on research. The absence of regulations regarding witnesses contained in the Notary Position Law or other regulations. Law No. 31 of 2014 amending Law No. 13 of 2006 on Witness and Victim Protection serves to provide legal protection to witnesses involved in the process of making notarial deeds. However, in Law No. 31 of 2014 amending Law No. 13 of 2006 on Witness and Victim Protection, the protection of witnesses' rights is still inadequate. Witnesses who are given protection by the Law are individuals who are directly involved and have knowledge and experience of a criminal offense. Meanwhile, a notarial deed witness is a person who is present to witness the formal process of making a deed. The Law on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims is inadequate in providing legal protection to witnesses involved in the process of making notarial deeds
Questioning State Supervision in Guaranteeing Halal Products in Indonesia Muttaqin, Irsyadul; Dhia Al Uyun; Riana Susmayanti
Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): July
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/am.v12i2.51437

Abstract

This article examines the state's responsibility in ensuring the halal status of products in Indonesia by highlighting the weaknesses in the implementation of the Halal Product Assurance Law. The formation of Government Regulation No. 42/2024 has created an illusory authority for the BPJPH and reinforced the fragmentation of authority between the BPJPH and related ministries in the supervision of halal products. As a result, legal uncertainty and the emergence of double standards have weakened BPJPH's role in supervisory implementation. This study uses a doctrinal legal analysis approach to halal product assurance legislation, focusing on text interpretation, identification of ambiguities, and disclosure of normative conflicts between the Halal Product Assurance Law, the Job Creation Law, and Government Regulation No. 42/2024. The analysis shows that institutional fragmentation in the supervision of the Halal Product Assurance has weakened BPJPH's authority. Instead of enforcing adequate supervision, the disharmonious institutional distribution design has created legal uncertainty, sectoral ego, and the risk of abuse of discretion, so that the substantive supervisory function has not been achieved and has legal implications for the state's failure to fulfill the objectives of Sharia law. A comparison with Malaysia shows that the centralization of authority under JAKIM, reinforced by criminal regulations, has resulted in a more integrated and consistent halal supervision system. This article emphasizes the need for institutional reform that affirms BPJPH's centralization as the sole authority and strengthens legal instruments by revising the Halal Product Assurance Law.
Co-Authors Achmad, Rinalvin Afifah Kusumadara Gerry Geovant Supranata Kaban Ira Nur Istiqomah Istiqomah, Ira Nur Istislam Istislam Istislam, Istislam Muttaqin, Irsyadul Nuri Vina Mawaddah Rachmi Sulistyarini Riana Susmayanti Rinalvin Achmad Wiryawan Tunggul Anshari S. N