Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences
Dhia Al Uyun
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
RAW Pemutusan Akses Terhadap Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik Lingkup Privat yang Tidak Terdaftar dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Achmad, Rinalvin; Istislam, Istislam; Dhia Al Uyun
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 3 No 6 (2024): IJHESS JUNE 2024
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.1003

Abstract

The policy of terminating access to Private Scope Electronic System Operators, to several internet platforms including: Paypal, Yahoo, Epic Games, Steam, Dota, Counter Strike, Xandr.com, and Origin, which occurred on July 30, 2022. The government's policy in terminating access to unregistered private scope electronic system operators has resulted in material and immaterial losses to citizens who use the platform of unregistered private scope electronic system operators. This research uses normative legal research method, that using a statutory, conceptual, and cases approach to analyze issues related to the termination of access to unregistered Private Scope PSEs. This research concludes that the government's policy of terminating access to unregistered private electronic system operators is contrary to human rights regulation. These rights include the right to access, communicate and obtain information and the right to an economy for citizens who are harmed by the termination of access to unregistered private scope electronic system operators.
Kedudukan Saksi Instrumen di Pengadilan Istiqomah, Ira Nur; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Dhia Al Uyun
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (April 2024)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/8fxk3695

Abstract

Notaris adalah pejabat publik yang berhak berwenang dalam membuat akta autentik, sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Salah satu syarat akta autentik adalah adanya saksi, yaitu saksi instrumen, saksi instrumen sebagai orang yang diwajibkan untuk hadir pada saat suatu peristiwa untuk menyaksikan, sehingga bila diperlukan dapat memberikan keterangannya yang membenarkan jika peristiwa tersebut benar terjadi. Terkait dengan hukum saksi instrumen ialah saksi dalam akta notaris yang ikut serta dalam hal pembuatan terjadinya akta yang dibuat notaris, saksi tersebut yang nama-namanya dicantumkan dalam akta notaris. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji urgensi pengaturan hukum saksi instrumen di pengadilan dan kedudukan saksi instrumen di pengadilan. Kedudukan saksi instrumen tidak diatur dalam suatu bentuk peraturan, dimana kedudukan saksi sangat penting dalam akta yang dibuat oleh notaris. Karena saksi turut dipanggil ke persidangan untuk memberikan keterangannya dalam hal akta yang dibuat oleh notaris di perkarakan oleh para pihak. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statue approach) dan pendekatan secara konseptual (Conseptual Approach). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian saksi instrumen dalam akta notaris belum diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Saksi instrumen akan ikut terkena proses penyidikan dan dipanggil untuk dimintai keterangannya. Notaris mempunyai hak ingkar sehingga ia bebas untuk tidak hadir dalam proses pemanggilan terkait akta yang dibuatnya. Sedangkan saksi tidak ada suatu aturan yang mengatur kedudukan, hak dan kewajiban nya sebagai saksi. Tidak diatur nya kedudukan saksi instrumen menimbulkan kekosongan norma hukum, diperlukan pembentukan norma baru, norma ini disebut sebagai ius constituendum atau lege ferenda mengenai hukum yang akan dicita-citakan kelak.
Legal Protection of Instrument Witnesses in Maintaining the Secret Position Notary Ira Nur Istiqomah; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Dhia Al Uyun
Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani Vol. 3 No. 8 (2023): August, 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/mudima.v3i8.5524

Abstract

Notary as an official who is legally authorized to make official deeds, in accordance with the provisions in Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the office of notary. A requirement that must be met to make an authentic deed is the presence of witnesses. This witness is a person who is present when an event occurs and has the ability to provide information that can prove that the event actually occurred. An instrument witness is a person who is present in the process of making a deed by a notary, where his name is also recorded in the deed. This study aims to analyze how the legal rules regulate and protect the confidentiality of information from instrument witnesses in maintaining the confidentiality of the notarial deed they witnessed. To protect them from possible undesirable consequences, there needs to be legal protection given to witnesses in the process of making notarial deeds. This is important because witnesses are often involved in problems or disputes that arise in relation to the documents they witness. In order for witnesses not to be victimized or further involved in the case, legal protection must be guaranteed to ensure that they will not be harmed due to their role as witnesses in the notarial deed. This research applies a normative legal research method using a statue approach. There are no clear provisions regarding the legal rules of instrument witnesses in notarial deeds based on research. The absence of regulations regarding witnesses contained in the Notary Position Law or other regulations. Law No. 31 of 2014 amending Law No. 13 of 2006 on Witness and Victim Protection serves to provide legal protection to witnesses involved in the process of making notarial deeds. However, in Law No. 31 of 2014 amending Law No. 13 of 2006 on Witness and Victim Protection, the protection of witnesses' rights is still inadequate. Witnesses who are given protection by the Law are individuals who are directly involved and have knowledge and experience of a criminal offense. Meanwhile, a notarial deed witness is a person who is present to witness the formal process of making a deed. The Law on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims is inadequate in providing legal protection to witnesses involved in the process of making notarial deeds
Co-Authors Achmad, Rinalvin Ira Nur Istiqomah Istiqomah, Ira Nur Istislam Istislam, Istislam Rachmi Sulistyarini