Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature
Meita L Sujatna
Universitas Widyatama Bandung, Indonesia
Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Impoliteness Strategies on Online Comments at Kompas TV YouTube Channel: A Pragmatic Analysis Hendar Hendar; Atri Nadia Astarina; Heri Heryono; Ida Zuraida; Meita L Sujatna
Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30605/25409190.480

Abstract

Communicating through social media requires proper communicative strategies to avoid any social conflict and disharmony that might happen for the improper strategies applied. Those related to politeness and impoliteness in utterance turn to be generic as in speech in the YouTube comments. This research proposes an analysis of impoliteness strategies as firstly proposed by Culpeper (2005). The proposed impoliteness strategies are classified into five categories; Bald on record, Positive, Negative, Sarcasm, and Withhold Impoliteness. This research applied a descriptive qualitative method in presenting analysis based on data collected from YouTube comments sourced from KOMPAS TV. The data from 100 comments containing impoliteness strategies on that video indicated that there were four categories of impoliteness in Culpeper (2005). The four categories of impoliteness identified include: 1)bald on record; 2) positive; 3) negative; and 4) sarcasm/mock. Based on the analysis, it was revealed that the majority or 44% of comments indicated the negative impoliteness category. The positive impoliteness and bold on record were found in the same percentage, 19% throughout the comments. While the other 18% of comments showed impoliteness in the form of sarcasm/mock. The impoliteness strategies were potential to appear in a public room such as online comments as responses to controversial contents that trigger the viewers' or reader's negative attitudes. Apart from that, some factors such as age, gender, and educational background might influence the use of impoliteness strategies and can be taken as a focus in further studies.
Co-Authors Atri Nadia Astarina Hendar Hendar Heri Heryono Ida Zuraida