Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Humanitarian Intervention And Just War Theory: Case of Kosovo Sellita
Jurnal Alternatif - Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Vol. 14 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Alternatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional
Publisher : Program Studi Hubungan Internasional FISIP Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Kosovo crisis occurred from February 1998 until 1999 in the former Yugoslavia. This conflict started when ethnic Albanians opposed ethnic Serbians and the Yugoslav government in Kosovo. International reactions to the upsurge of the Kosovo crisis have been prompt because of its urgency. Ethnic cleansing became good considering the international response. The intervention was carried out by NATO in the Kosovo crisis. The intervention by NATO raises speculation about humanitarian intervention during the crisis and whether it is justifiable or vice versa. According to the principle of Just War Theory, human intervention can be justified by logical explanations. NATO interventions in the Kosovo crisis are the appropriate instance to describe these situations by Just War Theory.
Media Sosial dan Pemilu: Studi Kasus Pemilihan Presiden Indonesia Sellita
Jurnal Lemhannas RI Vol 10 No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55960/jlri.v10i3.293

Abstract

Meskipun telah banyak penelitian terkonsentrasi pada kampanye digital, namun masih belum jelas bagaimana para kandidat menggunakan platform media sosial sebagai bentuk kampanye digital selama pemilihan umum. Tulisan ini fokus pada pemilihan Presiden di Indonesia pada tahun 2014 dan 2019 serta strategi politik yang digunakan masing-masing kandidat. Penelitian ini mengobservasi perbedaan pemilihan presiden dari dua tahun yang berbeda dan kemudian fokus pada strategi kampanye digital pada tahun 2019 melalui dua platform media sosial, Facebook dan Twitter. Berdasarkan tanggapan terbuka dari wawancara semi struktur yang disampaikan oleh beberapa ahli di bidang ini, hasil wawancara kemudian diidentifikasi ke dalam pembahasan yang menjadi jawaban atas pertanyaan penelitian untuk menjawab hipotesis utama. Kemudian, untuk memperkuat hipotesis utama, telah dilakukan analisis pada kumpulan data dari media sosial dengan platform Facebook dan Twitter melalui konten dan topik yang ditelaah dari akun masing-masing kandidat. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan antara Pilpres 2014 dan 2019 adalah penggunaan media mainstream dan media baru (new media). Ditemukan bahwa melalui media sosial, kedua kandidat memiliki taktik tertentu dalam melakukan kampanye digital untuk menarik perhatian pemilih.
The Reorientation of Indonesia’s Maritime Fulcrum in Addressing Shifting Priorities and Strategic Challenges Munabari, Fahlesa; Sellita
Jurnal Lemhannas RI Vol 12 No 4 (2024)
Publisher : Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55960/jlri.v12i4.967

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this article is to review the literature related to Indonesia’s Global Maritime Fulcrum (GMF) policy, which was initiated by President Joko Widodo at the beginning of his administration in 2014. This study seeks to identify the challenges that arose during the transition and implementation of the GMF policy, particularly in the period from 2014 to 2019. Study Design/Methodology/Approach: This article employs a qualitative research method with a descriptive-analytical approach. Literature sources such as journal articles, opinion pieces, books, and documents from relevant ministries and agencies are utilized to analyze the trends in the development of PMD policy during the second half of President Joko Widodo's administration. Findings: The findings indicate that most recent literature suggests a shift in priorities during President Joko Widodo's second term (2014-2019) concerning the GMF policy. This shift is evident from the decreasing focus on GMF in various speeches and governmental policies, alongside a greater emphasis on land-based infrastructure and economic development rather than maritime. The article categorizes the factors contributing to this shift into two major groups: external challenges and internal challenges. The primary external challenge currently faced by Indonesia is the increasing aggressiveness of China in the South China Sea. Meanwhile, the internal challenges include the limitations of military budgets, the COVID-19 pandemic, the allure of China's economic incentives, and a lack of coordination among related ministries and agencies.Top of FormBottom of Form Originality/Value: The study underscores the need on GMF issues should focus more on the prioritization of GMF programs. Additionally, relevant ministries and agencies need to establish realistic priorities within the GMF program, considering current budgetary constraints and the socio-political and economic landscape, to effectively achieve the GMF vision.
Laïcité and Discontents: Understanding Islamophobia in France Sellita Sellita; Amalia Hasyim
Journal of Social Research Vol. 4 No. 10 (2025): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v4i9.2744

Abstract

Islamophobia has grown significantly in France since President Emmanuel Macron permitted caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, which outraged Muslim communities. These events have contributed to the perception that Islam threatens French secular values (Laïcité). While France upholds a secular system where state affairs must remain separate from religion, the presence of Muslim immigrants has become a major concern for the French government, which worries about threats to the principle of secularity, as Islam is often viewed as incompatible with liberal French culture[A1]. This research examines the impact of Islamophobia on Muslim communities in France during President Emmanuel Macron's administration, using Constructivism and National Interest theories to analyze how Islamophobia influences Muslim society under Macron's leadership. The study employs qualitative methods and descriptive analysis, with data collected from secondary sources, including news outlets, official websites, and prior research related to Islamophobia in France. The findings indicate that Macron's statements and policies have significantly affected Muslim communities in France, leading to social discrimination, racism, violence, and international boycotts, though the long-term effects of international boycotts require further investigation. The research concludes that the reinforcement of laïcité has been instrumentalized in ways that disproportionately target Muslims, undermining social cohesion and human rights. The findings highlight the need for policy reforms that balance secular principles with religious freedom and inclusion, as well as greater international awareness of systemic Islamophobia in France.