Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Kepastian Hukum dalam Penjatuhan Tindakan Atas Dasar Keadaan Pribadi Anak Delviola Azhara; Ade Adhari
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i10.12994

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out how Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System regulates the imposition of measures on children who commit criminal offenses based on the child's personal circumstances. The research method used is normative juridical method with statutory approach. The personal circumstances of children can be used as a basis for judges' consideration not to impose criminal sanctions, but not as an excuse that can justify themselves in violating the law. Until now, the personal circumstances of children still exist as part of the reasons for criminal punishment. The legal certainty of the child's personal circumstances as the imposition of sanctions is important to provide justice to children who are perpetrators of criminal acts, that children who have (conditions) personal circumstances at the time of the act can be used as a basis for judges not to impose criminal sanctions by considering aspects of justice and humanity.
URGENSI MEMBANGUN MODEL IDEAL PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELANGGARAN HAK CIPTA DI ERA DIGITAL Mahardika Candrasari; Ade Adhari
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 13 No. 9 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2024.v13.i09.p13

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital telah membawa tantangan serius terhadap perlindungan dan penegakan hukum di bidang Hak Cipta di Indonesia. Pelanggaran hak cipta kini semakin kompleks, mencakup penggandaan tanpa izin, distribusi konten ilegal melalui platform daring, serta penyalahgunaan karya di media sosial yang mengakibatkan kerugian ekonomi serta pelanggaran hak moral pencipta. Secara normatif, instrumen hukum yang mengatur perlindungan Hak Cipta sudah cukup memadai, seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik beserta perubahannya. Namun, secara empiris, penegakan hukum menghadapi berbagai kendala, antara lain kesulitan pembuktian elektronik, keterbatasan sumber daya aparat, lemahnya regulasi teknis, rendahnya kesadaran hukum masyarakat, serta minimnya kerja sama internasional. Kondisi tersebut menunjukkan perlunya model penegakan hukum yang ideal yang bersifat integratif, adaptif, dan responsif terhadap perkembangan teknologi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pelaksanaan penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran Hak Cipta di era digital dan mengidentifikasi urgensi pembangunan model penegakan hukum yang ideal. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, yang berfokus pada analisis norma hukum positif serta teori hukum Friedman, Rawls, dan Rahardjo. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem hukum Indonesia masih menghadapi kendala dari aspek substansi, struktur, dan budaya hukum, termasuk lemahnya koordinasi antar-lembaga, rendahnya literasi hukum masyarakat, dan keterbatasan kemampuan teknis aparat. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, disimpulkan bahwa model penegakan hukum yang ideal harus bersifat integratif, adaptif, preventif, dan responsif terhadap perkembangan teknologi, sehingga dapat menjamin perlindungan hak pencipta, kepastian hukum, dan penguatan industri kreatif nasional. The development of digital technology has brought serious challenges to the protection and enforcement of copyright law in Indonesia. Copyright infringement is now increasingly complex, including unauthorized copying, distribution of illegal content through online platforms, and misuse of works on social media, resulting in economic losses and violations of the moral rights of creators. Normatively, the legal instruments governing copyright protection are adequate, such as Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright and Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions and its amendments. However, empirically, law enforcement faces various obstacles, including difficulties in electronic evidence, limited resources of officials, weak technical regulations, low public legal awareness, and minimal international cooperation. These conditions indicate the need for an ideal law enforcement model that is integrative, adaptive, and responsive to technological developments. This study aims to analyze the implementation of law enforcement against copyright infringement in the digital era and identify the urgency of developing an ideal law enforcement model. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach, focusing on the analysis of positive legal norms and the legal theories of Friedman, Rawls, and Rahardjo. The results of the study show that the Indonesian legal system still faces obstacles in terms of substance, structure, and legal culture, including weak coordination between institutions, low legal literacy among the public, and limited technical capabilities of officials. Based on these findings, it is concluded that the ideal law enforcement model must be integrative, adaptive, preventive, and responsive to technological developments, so as to guarantee the protection of creators' rights, legal certainty, and the strengthening of the national creative industry.
PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA ATAS KECERDASAN BUATAN (ARTIFICIAL INTELEGENCE) DAPAT MEWUJUDKAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA Asep Saiful Abdi; Ade Adhari
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 13 No. 10 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2025.v13.i10.p12

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji urgensi dan implementasi perlindungan Hak Cipta (HC) atas karya yang dihasilkan oleh Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence/AI) guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum di Indonesia. Perkembangan pesat teknologi AI, khususnya dalam menghasilkan karya kreatif (seperti seni, musik, dan teks), menimbulkan ambiguitas hukum mengenai subjek dan objek hak cipta yang berlaku. Hukum Hak Cipta di Indonesia (UU No. 28 Tahun 2014) saat ini masih berfokus pada kreativitas manusia sebagai syarat mutlak perolehan hak, sehingga belum mampu mengakomodasi status hukum karya otonom AI. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil analisis menunjukkan adanya kekosongan hukum terkait pengakuan karya cipta AI dan perlindungan hak bagi pihak-pihak yang terlibat (pengembang, pengguna, atau AI itu sendiri). Kekosongan ini berdampak pada ketidakpastian dalam hal pertanggungjawaban pelanggaran, masa berlaku perlindungan, dan mekanisme lisensi karya cipta AI. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya reformasi hukum hak cipta di Indonesia. Opsi yang ditawarkan mencakup: (1) Mengadopsi konsep legal personality terbatas atau hak terkait sui generis bagi AI, atau (2) Memperluas definisi pencipta dengan mengakui peran pengembang atau pengguna AI sebagai pihak yang berhak atas dasar investasi atau kontrol. Adopsi regulasi yang komprehensif dan adaptif menjadi kunci untuk menjamin kepastian hukum, mendorong inovasi, dan melindungi kepentingan ekonomi di era digital Indonesia This study examines the urgency and implementation of Copyright Protection for works generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) in order to realize legal certainty in Indonesia. The rapid development of AI technology, particularly in generating creative works (such as art, music, and text), creates legal ambiguity regarding the subject and object of applicable copyright. The current Indonesian Copyright Law (Law No. 28 of 2014) remains focused on human creativity as a prerequisite for obtaining rights, thus failing to accommodate the legal status of autonomous AI works. This research employs a normative legal research methodology with a statutory and conceptual approach. The analysis results indicate a legal vacuum concerning the recognition of AI-generated works and the protection of rights for the parties involved (developers, users, or the AI itself). This vacuum leads to uncertainty regarding liability for infringement, the duration of protection, and the licensing mechanisms for AI-generated works. This study recommends the necessity of copyright law reform in Indonesia. The proposed options include: (1) Adopting the concept of limited legal personality or sui generis related rights for AI, or (2) Broadening the definition of an author by acknowledging the role of the AI developer or user as the entitled party based on investment or control. The adoption of comprehensive and adaptive regulations is key to ensuring legal certainty, fostering innovation, and protecting economic interests in Indonesia's digital era.
PEMBINAAN KESADARAN HUKUM OLEH NOTARIS SEBAGAI UPAYA MENJAMIN KEABSAHAN WASIAT Sy. Hilda Sopia Lianty. A; Ade Adhari
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 13 No. 12 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2025.v13.i12.p01

Abstract

Penelitian ini menelusuri bagaimana notaris berkontribusi dalam membentuk pemahaman masyarakat mengenai prosedur pembuatan wasiat yang sah secara hukum. Meski aturan wasiat telah diatur tegas dalam KUHPerdata, praktik di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa banyak individu masih membuat wasiat secara sederhana dan tidak sesuai standar hukum yang berlaku. Situasi ini muncul akibat kurangnya pemahaman hukum, kekeliruan dalam memaknai konsep wasiat, serta keyakinan keliru bahwa surat pribadi sudah memadai sebagai dasar pembagian harta. Dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris melalui penelaahan terhadap KUHPerdata, UU Jabatan Notaris, serta wawancara dengan Notaris Imelda Silvia Christina, S.H., M.Kn. penelitian ini menemukan bahwa peran notaris jauh melampaui fungsi formal pembuatan akta. Notaris juga bertindak sebagai pendidik hukum yang memberikan penjelasan, bimbingan, dan peringatan mengenai konsekuensi hukum apabila wasiat tidak dibuat sesuai ketentuan. Upaya tersebut berdampak pada meningkatnya pemahaman masyarakat, berkurangnya kemungkinan sengketa waris, serta terciptanya praktik hukum yang lebih teratur. This study explores how notaries contribute to enhancing public understanding of the legally valid procedures for drafting a will. Although the regulations governing wills are explicitly outlined in the Indonesian Civil Code, many individuals still prepare wills informally and in ways that do not comply with legal requirements. This situation stems from limited legal literacy, misunderstandings about the concept of a will, and the mistaken belief that a personal written statement is sufficient as a basis for inheritance distribution. Using a juridical-empirical approach through an examination of the Civil Code, the Notary Office Act, and interviews with Notary Imelda Silvia Christina, S.H., M.Kn. the study reveals that the role of notaries extends beyond formally drafting authentic deeds. Notaries also function as legal educators who provide explanations, guidance, and warnings regarding the legal consequences of drafting wills improperly. These efforts help increase public awareness, reduce the likelihood of inheritance disputes, and promote more orderly legal practices.