Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PROVOCATIVE VICTIMS: SEBUAH BENTUK MERINGANKAN HUKUMAN PIDANA Dwi Cesario Mellio Kurniawan; Ade Adhari
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2022.v11.i01.p15

Abstract

Tujuan studi ini untuk mengkaji provokasi korban atau provocative victims sebagai hal yang dapat dipertimbangkan hakim dalam putusan pemidanaan. studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa provokasi korban harus dijadikan pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara pidana demi mencapai rasa keadilan dan menjamin tidak adanya kerugian. Hakim dapat memakai Pasal 197 ayat (1) huruf f KUHAP sebagai ruang bagi hakim untuk mempertimbangkan provocative victims sebagai alasan yang meringankan terdakwa serta jika memang RKUHP sudah berlaku, maka dasar hukum atas provocative victims semakin jelas dengan adanya aturan pada Pasal 70 yang menyinggung akan provokasi korban atau provocative victims. Sehingga apa yang dipertimbangkan hakim dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Lubuksikaping nomor 34/PID.SUS/2021/PN LBS sangat tepat untuk mempertimbangkan provocative victims. The purpose of this study is to examine provocative victims as a matter that can be considered by judges in sentencing decisions. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The results of the study show that provocation of victims must be taken into consideration by judges in deciding criminal cases in order to achieve a sense of justice and ensure the absence of harm. Judges can use Article 197 paragraph (1) letter f of the Criminal Procedure Code as a space for judges to consider provocative victims as a reason that mitigates the defendant and if the Criminal Code is already in effect, then the legal basis for provocative victims is clearer with the rules in Article 70 which allude to provocative victims. So that what the judge considered in the Lubuksikaping District Court Decision number 34/PID.SUS/2021/PN LBS was very appropriate to consider provocative victims.
KEBIJAKAN PENCEGAHAN PENCURIAN DATA ATM (SKIMMING) DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP KONSUMEN PERBANKAN DI INDONESIA Laura Cecilia; Ade Adhari
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 9 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i09.p09

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami dan menganalisa kebijakan pencegahan skimming yang dilakukan oleh Bank Indonesia bersama dengan pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan terhadap konsumen perbankan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan pencegahan skimming yang dilakukan oleh Bank Indonesia adalah dengan mengenalkan teknologi chip dan personal identification number (PIN) pada setiap kartu yang dikeluarkan oleh lembaga penerbit. Selain itu, pemerintah juga mengeluarkan dan mengesahkan Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi baru-baru ini guna mencegah terjadinya skimming di Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to comprehend and analyze Bank Indonesia and the government skimming prevention policies to safeguard banking customers. This study employs the juridical-empirical legal method with a statutory and concept approach. The findings of this study indicate that Bank Indonesia's skimming prevention policies are implement chip technology and a personal identification number (PIN) on each card issued by the issuing institution. To prevent skimming in Indonesia, the government recently issued and passed Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection.
Kepastian Hukum dalam Penjatuhan Tindakan Atas Dasar Keadaan Pribadi Anak Delviola Azhara; Ade Adhari
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i10.12994

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out how Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System regulates the imposition of measures on children who commit criminal offenses based on the child's personal circumstances. The research method used is normative juridical method with statutory approach. The personal circumstances of children can be used as a basis for judges' consideration not to impose criminal sanctions, but not as an excuse that can justify themselves in violating the law. Until now, the personal circumstances of children still exist as part of the reasons for criminal punishment. The legal certainty of the child's personal circumstances as the imposition of sanctions is important to provide justice to children who are perpetrators of criminal acts, that children who have (conditions) personal circumstances at the time of the act can be used as a basis for judges not to impose criminal sanctions by considering aspects of justice and humanity.