Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)
Ervina Sari Sipahutar
Universitas Al-Azhar
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Yuridis Penangkapan Ikan Secara Illegal (Illegal Fishing) Menurut Undang Undang Nomor 45 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perikanan Warsiman Warsiman; Ervina Sari Sipahutar; Anjani Sipahutar
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 5, No 3 (2023): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), February
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (304.741 KB) | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v5i3.1551

Abstract

Indonesia is a country where most of its territory consists of oceans with a population whose development continues to increase and can be expressed in meeting the needs of life, especially in coastal areas, such as fishermen who live in coastal areas generally using a source of life from the marine and fisheries sector. Indonesia as an archipelagic country surrounded by oceans has a strategic position and extraordinary potential with territorial waters, both archipelagic waters and inland waters. In addition, the Indonesian seas also include the sea waters of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The economic loss caused by the practice of illegal fishing does not only result in loss of state revenues but also loss of opportunities for catching fish by Indonesian fishermen. If examined more deeply, it can be said that illegal fishing causes a lot of losses, not just counting how many fish have been stolen, but the impact is even wider, the financial burden is borne by the state, such as fuel subsidies (BBM) which are ultimately enjoyed by ships. -illegal vessels, reduced non-tax revenue (PNBP), reduced Indonesian fishermen's job opportunities, because illegal vessels are foreign ships that use their own crew (ABK), catches are generally brought directly abroad (country from ships), threats to the sustainability of fish resources because catches are not detected, both in type, size and quantity.
THE INTEGRATION OF DIVINE JUSTICE IN JUDICIAL REASONING WITHIN THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE FRAMEWORK Irwansyah; Muhammad Juang Rambe; Ervina Sari Sipahutar
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

How can religious values be integrated into judicial reasoning in criminal cases without compromising legal certainty, evidentiary requirements, and the protection of the parties’ rights? This article examines the relationship between intersubjectivity, Pancasila values, and judicial reasoning in advancing religious justice within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Employing doctrinal and philosophical legal research, the article adopts statutory and conceptual approaches, drawing on legal literature and secondary analyses of criminal cases. The findings indicate that intersubjectivity can facilitate the examination of arguments presented by the parties but cannot replace legally admissible evidence and judicial conviction as required under the Indonesian Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP). Judicial decisions should incorporate legal, sociological, and philosophical considerations supported by clear and legally defensible reasoning. Biomijuridika serves as a conceptual framework linking belief in God with respect for human dignity without privileging any particular religious interpretation. The judicial pardon provisions of Law No. 1 of 2023 are examined as prospective sentencing reforms, distinct from acquittals and judgments releasing defendants from all legal charges. The article recommends developing guidelines for judicial pardons and strengthening training in ethical judicial reasoning, with due regard for legality, judicial independence, equality, and victims’ interests.
Co-Authors Anjani Sipahutar Irwansyah Muhammad Juang Rambe Warsiman Warsiman