Mustolih Siradj, Mustolih
Asosiasi Pengacara Syariah Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ARGUMENTASI HUKUM JAMINAN PRODUK HALAL Siradj, Mustolih
Jurnal Bimas Islam Vol 8 No 1 (2015): Jurnal Bimas Islam
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (433.162 KB)

Abstract

Abstract During this time most of the arguments in eliminating halal assurance system (SJH) is based on sectarian argument because the benefit is just come to a certain denomination, Islamic Ummah, on the other hand harming another religion. Textually could be phrase 'halal' is synonymous with the everyday vocabulary of the Muslims. But when we examined further, the problem of availability of halal products is not only a matter of Islamic Ummah, but also the problems of humanity. Because of the food consumed by the human race originated chain up to the birth of civilization is exist and specified quality. The halal food is kosher and thoyyib (good / nutritious) will give birth to a superior human generation. State in this matter has also been actively contribute to provide halal food products through a variety of regulatory instruments. This happened long before the enactment of Law No. 33 Year 2014 on Halal Product Guarantee (UU-JPH). There are many laws that spread such as the food laws, health laws, consumer protection laws and regulations under enactment reserved. Birth of UUJPH inspired by Islamic Shari'a becomes a confirmation of how the urgency of halal product assurance is a very urgent problem in addition to responding to the trend of global halal being implicated. By doing so, the consumer society are protected and inwardly feel comfortable consume and use products manufactured by businesses (manufacturers), both domestic and export.   Abstraksi Selama ini kebanyakan argumentasi dalam mengelominasi sistem jaminan halal (SJH) didasarkan pada argumentasi sektarian karena hanya menguntungkan ummat agama tertentu yakni ummat islam, di sisi lain merugikan ummat agama lain. Secara tekstual bisa frase ?halal? memang identik dengan kosa kata sehari-hari kaum muslim. Akan tetapi bila dicermati dan ditelisik lebih jauh masalah ketersediaan produk halal bukan hanya masalah ummat islam, akan tetapi persoalan kemanusiaan. Karena dari makanan yang dikonsumsi bermula rantai kehidupan ummat manusia hingga lahirnya peradaban bisa ada dan ditentukan kualitasnya. Makanan yang halal dan thoyyib (baik/bergizi) akan melahirkan generasi manusia yang unggul. Negara dalam persoalan ini juga telah aktif hadir berkontribusi menyediakan produk pangan halal melalui berbagai instrumen regulasi. Hal ini terjadi jauh sebelum lahirnya UU Nomor 33 Tahun 2014 tentang Jaminan Produk Halal (UU-JPH) ada banyak peraturan yang tersebar seperti pada undang-undang pangan, undang-undang kesehatan, undang-undang perlindungan konsumen dan peraturan-peraturan di bawah undang-undang. Lahirnya UUJPH yang terilhami oleh syariat islam menjadi penegas betapa urgensi jaminan produk halal merupakan persoalan yang sangat mendesak disamping merespon tren halal global yang sedang menggejala. Dengan begitu, masyarakat konsumen terlindungi dan secara batin merasa nyaman mengkonsumsi dan menggunakan produk yang diproduksi oleh pelaku usaha (produsen), baik domestik maupun ekspor.
Judge's arguments in decisions involving Sharia economic disputes in the regional religious courts of Jakarta, 2015–2022. Rahman, Faqih Zuhdi; Siradj, Mustolih; Asadurrahman, Asadurrahman
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i1.35955

Abstract

Judges must be capable of settling sharia economic issues without departing from accepted sharia principles. When weighing each decision, the judge takes into account the DSN-MUI Fatwa, which serves as a manual and a mechanism for the implementation of sharia economic activities in Indonesia, as well as KHES, which serves as the primary legal framework for religious courts handling sharia economic disputes. This study intends to map the judges' arguments in sharia economic issues and explain how the National Sharia Council-Indonesian Ulema Council (DSN-MUI) Fatwa and the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES) are applied in Religious Court rulings involving sharia economic disputes. A qualitative approach is applied in the study methodology, which is normative legal research. The study's findings demonstrate that the judges' arguments in sharia economic matters in the Jakarta Regional Religious Court jurisdiction reflect their own viewpoints. The judge's arguments in the five Religious Courts in the Jakarta region frequently reference the Civil Code for legal justifications. The DSN-MUI Fatwa and KHES must be applied as effectively as possible. The use of KHES is only used in specific articles, namely using Articles 36 and 38 of the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law and the DSN-MUI Fatwa, which is mostly used in matters of compensation or ta'widh or sanctions for customers who are unable to fulfill their obligations, according to an analysis of sharia economic case decisions at the Jakarta Regional Religious Court.