Aries Isnandar
Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Suro Month Wedding Prohibition: Islamic Perspective Customary Law Debate Alfalachu Indiantoro; Aries Isnandar; Johan Fendy Pratama; Ferry Irawan Febriansyah; Yogi Prasetyo
Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education
Publisher : Al-Hayat Al-Istiqomah Foundation collab with Letiges

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35723/ajie.v6i2.320

Abstract

The Javanese tradition of avoiding marriage in the month of Suro is highly upheld, especially by the community. It is widely believed that marriage in the month of Suro will bring danger to the bride and groom, whereas in the Islamic concept, there is no prohibition against marriage in the month of Suro (Muharram). Departing from these reasons, the purpose of this study is to describe two different views of Islamic teachings and Javanese cultural traditions that have continued to contradict each other from ancient times to the present. This research is set in Ponorogo Regency, East Java. The research method used is qualitative with a sociological empirical juridical approach. The primary data used are facts about human behaviour and written documents from traditional leaders, religious leaders and related people. Using interviews and documentation for data collection, then analyzed using sociological empirical juridical. The results of the study show that the philosophical meaning of the prohibition of marriage in the month of Suro that occurs in Javanese society, especially in Ponorogo Regency, can be divided into two sides based on Paul Ricoeur's theory, namely the meaning of the prohibition from the side of the text maker and the side of the recipient/reader of the text. From the perspective of these two sides, then the philosophical meaning contained in the tradition of prohibiting marriage in the month of Suro can be concluded as a syncretism meaning between Javanese religions and cultures.
Illegal Cigarettes from a Legal Perspective: The Discrepancybetween Excise Regulations and Law Enforcement in the Field Imora Helguera; Aries Isnandar; Azis Akbar Ramadhan
Fenomena Vol 25 No 1 (2026): FENOMENA: Journal of the Social Sciences
Publisher : LP2M Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/fenomena.v25i1.636

Abstract

The widespread circulation of illegal cigarettes in Indonesia causes significant economic, legal, and social losses, highlighting a persistent gap between strict excise regulations and weak field enforcement. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing tobacco excise and examine the key factors that undermine law enforcement against illegal cigarettes. Using a normative legal method, the research analyzes secondary data from legal documents and the literature. The findings reveal that the regulation-enforcement gap is driven by limited supervisory capacity, the complexity of illegal distribution networks, persistently high market demand fueled by price disparities, poor interagency coordination, and inconsistent enforcement of sanctions. Consequently, the study concludes that strengthening law enforcement capacity, enhancing coordination among Customs, police, and local governments, using information technology for surveillance, and increasing public participation are essential strategies. The research recommends that future policies adopt a multidisciplinary approach that integrates legal, economic, and social dimensions and that further empirical studies be conducted to measure enforcement effectiveness more comprehensively, thereby ensuring more sustainable excise law enforcement in Indonesia. Peredaran rokok ilegal di Indonesia menimbulkan kerugian ekonomi, hukum, dan sosial yang signifikan, sekaligus menunjukkan kesenjangan persisten antara regulasi cukai yang ketat dan lemahnya penegakan hukum di lapangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kerangka hukum cukai tembakau dan mengkaji faktor utama penyebab ketidakefektifan penegakan hukum terhadap rokok ilegal. Dengan metode hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, penelitian ini menganalisis data sekunder dari dokumen hukum dan studi pustaka. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa kesenjangan regulasi dan penegakan hukum disebabkan oleh kapasitas pengawasan yang terbatas, kompleksitas jaringan distribusi ilegal, tingginya permintaan pasar akibat perbedaan harga, koordinasi antarlembaga yang lemah, serta penerapan sanksi yang tidak konsisten. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penguatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum, peningkatan koordinasi antara Bea Cukai, kepolisian, dan pemerintah daerah, pemanfaatan teknologi informasi untuk pengawasan, serta peningkatan partisipasi publik merupakan strategi esensial. Rekomendasi penelitian adalah bahwa kebijakan masa depan harus mengadopsi pendekatan multidisiplin yang mengintegrasikan aspek hukum, ekonomi, dan sosial, serta perlunya studi empiris lebih lanjut untuk mengukur efektivitas penegakan hukum secara komprehensif demi terwujudnya penegakan hukum cukai yang berkelanjutan di Indonesia.