Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education Jurnal Jurisprudence
Yogi Prasetyo
Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Suro Month Wedding Prohibition: Islamic Perspective Customary Law Debate Alfalachu Indiantoro; Aries Isnandar; Johan Fendy Pratama; Ferry Irawan Febriansyah; Yogi Prasetyo
Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education
Publisher : Al-Hayat Al-Istiqomah Foundation collab with Letiges

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35723/ajie.v6i2.320

Abstract

The Javanese tradition of avoiding marriage in the month of Suro is highly upheld, especially by the community. It is widely believed that marriage in the month of Suro will bring danger to the bride and groom, whereas in the Islamic concept, there is no prohibition against marriage in the month of Suro (Muharram). Departing from these reasons, the purpose of this study is to describe two different views of Islamic teachings and Javanese cultural traditions that have continued to contradict each other from ancient times to the present. This research is set in Ponorogo Regency, East Java. The research method used is qualitative with a sociological empirical juridical approach. The primary data used are facts about human behaviour and written documents from traditional leaders, religious leaders and related people. Using interviews and documentation for data collection, then analyzed using sociological empirical juridical. The results of the study show that the philosophical meaning of the prohibition of marriage in the month of Suro that occurs in Javanese society, especially in Ponorogo Regency, can be divided into two sides based on Paul Ricoeur's theory, namely the meaning of the prohibition from the side of the text maker and the side of the recipient/reader of the text. From the perspective of these two sides, then the philosophical meaning contained in the tradition of prohibiting marriage in the month of Suro can be concluded as a syncretism meaning between Javanese religions and cultures.
Analysis of the Reasons for the Judge's Decision Which Relieves Defendants in Corruption Cases Yogi prasetyo; Ferry Irawan Febriansyah; Alfalachu Indiantoro; Aries Isnandar; Ucuk Agiyanto
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 1, June 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1008

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This research article aims to explain the analysis of several reasons for the judge's decision which is considered to lighten the defendant in corruption cases in Indonesia.  Methodology: This study used a normative research method with a philosophical approach. Results: The results of this study indicate that judges continue to impose light sanctions on state officials who are accused of corruption cases for various reasons that can be taken into consideration. The following is an analysis of some of these reasons: have never been punished; be honest and be kind; have family responsibilities; refund corrupted money; incorrect application of the law; have no authority; motivated by other people; have a sense of justice; serve the community; get public scorn; and refrain from engaging in corrupt behavior. Applications of this study: Theoretically, academics can use this research to add and develop their knowledge of the law. As for practitioners, especially judges, this research can be used as material for conclusions and considerations when making decisions in corruption cases, so that efforts to eradicate corruption can definitely be achieved. Novelty/Originality of this study: The corruption issue in Indonesia is influenced by the judge's decision in addition to the country’s bad bureaucratic culture. The low judge's decision on corruption cases can also affect the number of state officials who commit acts of corruption. Several reasons that could influence the judge's decision to reduce the corruptors’ sentences. In order to find a true legal truth, it would be useful to study the judge’s reasoning for reducing the corruptor’s punishment because the judge's decision is the most decisive stage in the legal status and fate of the defendant. This is why it is critical to do a more in-depth review of the law in order to ensure that it continues to operate as intended
Co-Authors Alfalachu Indiantoro Alfalachu Indiantoro Aries Isnandar Aries Isnandar Ferry Irawan Febriansyah Ferry Irawan Febriansyah Johan Fendy Pratama Ucuk Agiyanto