Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia Jurnal Suara Hukum
Daru Adianto
Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Peranan Budaya Hukum Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Dalam Penetapan Hutan Adat Daru Adianto; Muamar
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

After the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 35/PUU-X/2012 which stated that customary forests are not part of state forests but private forests provide legal certainty and protection of the rights of indigenous peoples in managing customary forests. As a follow-up to this decision, the Ministry of Environment and Forestry established Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation P.32/Menlhk-Setjen/2015 concerning Private Forests which has been renewed through Minister of Environment and Forestry No.9 of 2021 concerning Management of Social Forestry. Until now, the number of customary forests that have been determined is 107 customary forest units. One of the factors supporting the increase in the number of customary forests is a change in the internal legal culture of the LHK when verifying and validating customary forest applications. Based on the results of the research, facts and problems were found, one of which was related to the requirements for recognition of legal subjects for groups holding rights through regional legal products which could be in the form of Regional Regulations (PERDA). The PERDA contains the Recognition and Protection of Indigenous Peoples and the areas managed by these communities. Some PERDAs are not included with maps of customary territories or there are no other regional legal products that define the boundaries of the community's managed areas. In addition to the problems of legal subjects and areas of management, changes in the legal culture within a government institution also have an influence on the process of recognizing these rights. This writing uses an empirical legal research approach by examining the roles of the legal culture of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry in determining customary forests
Penggunaan Bukti Ilmiah dan Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-hatian dalam Putusan Perkara Pidana Materiil Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia Tahun 2009–2020 Fachrizal Afandi; Daru Adianto; Prischa Listiningrum; Monnachu Wemonicha Lovina
Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia Vol 9 No 1 (2022): Oktober
Publisher : Indonesian Center for Environmental Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38011/jhli.v9i1.500

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis potret penggunaan bukti ilmiah (scientific evidence) dalam putusan perkara pidana lingkungan hidup di Indonesia dan kesesuaian penggunaan bukti ilmiah dengan prinsip kehati-hatian pada pertimbangan Hakim dalam putusan perkara pidana lingkungan hidup. Permasalahan tersebut didasari pada pentingnya keberadaan bukti ilmiah serta pengaruhnya terhadap penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam pemeriksaan perkara, khususnya berkaitan dengan kekuatan alat bukti ilmiah yang dihadirkan di persidangan. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan ialah penelitian hukum interdisipliner dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (Statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan studi kasus analisa putusan pengadilan (case law approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kuat lemahnya bukti ilmiah sangat dipengaruhi oleh keabsahan atau validitas dari masing-masing isi dan bentuk dari bukti ilmiah itu sendiri. Penggunaan bukti ilmiah pada pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara juga erat kaitannya dengan penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian sebagai salah satu substantive legal principles dalam penanganan perkara pidana lingkungan hidup.
Bentuk Tanggung Jawab Produsen Kemasan Plastik Dalam Skema Extended Producer Responsibility : Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dan Uni Eropa Daru Adianto; Farah Adriani
Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia Vol 10 No 2 (2024): April
Publisher : Indonesian Center for Environmental Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38011/jhli.v10i2.853

Abstract

The application of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme in waste management in Indonesia is particularly interesting to compare with the EPR framework in Europe and its member states, given their long-standing experience. Such experience can serve as a valuable reference for Indonesia. By adopting a regulatory approach and comparing the frameworks in both regions, it is evident that the implementation of the EPR concept varies across member states, prompting the European Union to introduce more specific regulations. In contrast, in Indonesia, the adoption of EPR is designed by individual producers with reference to a ministerial regulation issued in 2019. The extended responsibility assigned to producers encompasses both the reduction stage—through product redesign—and the obligation to take back post-consumer waste for proper treatment. The regulation employs a system of incentives and disincentives as policy instruments, although their exact form has yet to be determined. Based on this analysis, Indonesia needs to develop an EPR framework that is both effective in reducing the state’s burden in waste management and aligned with the country’s unique characteristics.
Co-Authors Fachrizal Afandi Farah Adriani Monnachu Wemonicha Lovina Muamar Prischa Listiningrum