Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.44
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syntax Idea Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Constitutum: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Evita Isretno Israhadi
Universitas Borobudur
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Energy Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEWENANGAN ABSOLUT PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA TERHADAP TINDAKAN PEMERINTAH (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 230/G/TF/2019/PTUN.JKT) Henri Silalahi; Evita Isretno Israhadi
Constitutum: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Borobudur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37721/constitutum.v1i2.1327

Abstract

The State Administrative Court (PTUN) has an important role as a control or supervision institution to ensure that decisions and/or legal actions taken by the government (bestuur) remain within the legal framework. There are cases of government actions that are detrimental to citizens, such as blocking data services and/or cutting off internet access in 4 cities/regencies in Papua Province. The problem in this research is the PTUN's authority to adjudicate government actions and the conformity of Decision Number 230/G/TF/2019/PTUN-Jkt with statutory regulations. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of this research are: a. The authority of the State Administrative Court in adjudicating government actions is in accordance with the General Explanation of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. Article 1 number 18 of the law confirms that the PTUN has absolute authority to judge the actions of government officials or state administrators related to the implementation or non-implementation of concrete actions in the administration of government. Then, Decision Number 230/G/TF/2019/PTUN-Jkt was deemed to be in accordance with state administrative laws and regulations. Government actions in limiting internet access are considered unlawful acts by government bodies and/or officials because they violate Article 1 number 1 of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 23 of 1959/UU Number 23 Prp of 1959 concerning Emergency Situations.
Co-Authors Aan Rizalni Kurniawan Ahmad Redi Askolani Jasi Evi Oktarina Faisal Santiago Fransisca Dewi Zion Henri Silalahi I Wayan Mustika Eko Yuda Jamaluddin Sungsang Leti Ratna Kusumawati Megawati Barthos Miftahul Munir Nana Supiana Riswadi Riswadi Ryan Rainhard Marchello Suparno Suparno Zudan Arief Fakrulloh