Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Ahmad Yani Anshori
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Legal Politics of the Aceh Governor's Policy Regarding Religious Activities in Public Sphere: David Easton's Political Theory perspective Muhammad Fakhrul Mahdi; Ahmad Yani Anshori
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 56, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law - Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v56i1.1105

Abstract

Abstract: This article examines the phenomenon which caused the issuance and the formation of the Aceh Governor Circular Letter concerning the recitation prohibition other than the Aqidah of Ahlussunnah wal Jamaah. This article employs the empirical legal studies approach and the analysis of David Easton's system theory. This article finds that the Aceh Governor's Circular Letter was motivated by the emergence of the recitation phenomenon in the Aceh region, which teachings are considered apart from the Ahlussunnah wal Jamā'ah aqidah. This Circular Letter is also based on the existence of the Aceh Qanun Number 8 of 2014 demands and Aceh Ulema Consultative Council (MPU) support. The history of diversity, socio-religious practices, and education that developed in Aceh also contributed to the Aceh Governor Circular Letter promulgation. The Aceh Governor policy in David Easton's political theory is called the output sub-system (output). This policy has produced both positive and negative impacts. The negative impact of the Aceh Governor Circular Letter then becomes feedback for stakeholders to formulate new policies that could accommodate and protect all groups. Abstrak: Artikle ini mengkaji fenomena yang melatari lahirnya Surat Edaran Gubernur Aceh tentang larangan pengajian selain aqidah Ahlussunnah wal Jamaah beserta proses pembentukannya. Menggunakan pendekatan empirical legal studies dan analisis teori sistem David Easton diperoleh temuan sebagai berikut. Pertama, lahirnya Surat Edaran Gubernur Aceh dilatarbelakangi oleh munculnya fenomena pengajian di wilayah Aceh yang mengajarkan paham yang diyakini berada di luar aqidah Ahlussunnah wal Jamā'ah. Selain itu, ia juga didasarkan pada adanya tuntutan (demand) dari Qanun Aceh Nomor 8 Tahun 2014 serta dukungan dari Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama (MPU) Aceh. Sejarah keberagamaan, praktik sosial keagamaan, dan pendidikan yang berkembang di Aceh juga ikut melatari lahirnya Surat Efaran Gubernur Aceh ini. Kedua, lahirnya kebijakan (policy) Gubernur Aceh tersebut dalam teori politik David Easton disebut sebagai subsistem keluaran (output). Kebijakan ini dalam faktanya telah melahirkan dampak positif dan negatif sekaligus. Dampak negatif dari Surat Edaran Gubernur Aceh tersebut kemudian menjadi umpan balik (feedback) bagi para pemangku kepentingan untuk merumuskan kebijakan baru yang bisa mengakomodasi dan melindungai semua kalangan.
Arbitration Authority in Business Dispute Resolution in Indonesia trinarti pasaribu; Habibi Natama Ritonga; Raja Brahma Sembiring; Nurhatifah Manurung; Ahmad Yani Anshori
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Vol 1. No 2 Sept 2024 : JCISNU
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.247

Abstract

Arbitration has become one of the important mechanisms in the resolution of business disputes in Indonesia, mainly due to its ability to provide a faster, more flexible, and confidential resolution compared to general courts. However, there are various legal issues related to the authority of arbitration, especially in terms of the implementation of the arbitration award and the involvement of the court in the execution process. This research aims to analyze the authority of arbitration in the resolution of business disputes in Indonesia, evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of arbitration decisions, and discuss future developments in arbitration policies and regulations. This research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach, utilizing primary legal materials such as Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of journals, books, and scientific articles. The data analysis technique used is qualitative, which analyzes various legal rules and their implementation in arbitration practices in Indonesia. The results of the study show that the authority of arbitration in Indonesia has been regulated quite clearly through laws and regulations, although in practice there are obstacles in the execution of arbitral awards involving courts. In addition, the practice of arbitration in Indonesia continues to grow, but challenges remain related to competition with international arbitration bodies and the need for regulatory reform. The discussion of this research highlights the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration compared to the courts, the effectiveness of the implementation of arbitration decisions, and the direction of arbitration policies going forward, including the adoption of technology and harmonization with international standards. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that arbitration is an effective business dispute resolution mechanism, but it requires strengthening in the aspects of regulation and decision implementation. This research recommends policy reforms to strengthen arbitration mechanisms and encourage businesses to utilize arbitration as an efficient and effective solution.
Arbitration Authority in Business Dispute Resolution in Indonesia trinarti pasaribu; Habibi Natama Ritonga; Raja Brahma Sembiring; Nurhatifah Manurung; Ahmad Yani Anshori
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Vol 1. No 2 Sept 2024 : JCISNU
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.247

Abstract

Arbitration has become one of the important mechanisms in the resolution of business disputes in Indonesia, mainly due to its ability to provide a faster, more flexible, and confidential resolution compared to general courts. However, there are various legal issues related to the authority of arbitration, especially in terms of the implementation of the arbitration award and the involvement of the court in the execution process. This research aims to analyze the authority of arbitration in the resolution of business disputes in Indonesia, evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of arbitration decisions, and discuss future developments in arbitration policies and regulations. This research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach, utilizing primary legal materials such as Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of journals, books, and scientific articles. The data analysis technique used is qualitative, which analyzes various legal rules and their implementation in arbitration practices in Indonesia. The results of the study show that the authority of arbitration in Indonesia has been regulated quite clearly through laws and regulations, although in practice there are obstacles in the execution of arbitral awards involving courts. In addition, the practice of arbitration in Indonesia continues to grow, but challenges remain related to competition with international arbitration bodies and the need for regulatory reform. The discussion of this research highlights the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration compared to the courts, the effectiveness of the implementation of arbitration decisions, and the direction of arbitration policies going forward, including the adoption of technology and harmonization with international standards. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that arbitration is an effective business dispute resolution mechanism, but it requires strengthening in the aspects of regulation and decision implementation. This research recommends policy reforms to strengthen arbitration mechanisms and encourage businesses to utilize arbitration as an efficient and effective solution.
Co-Authors Habibi Natama Ritonga Muhammad Fakhrul Mahdi Nurhatifah Manurung Raja Brahma Sembiring trinarti pasaribu