Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum NEGARA DAN KEADILAN Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal)
Arfan Kaimuddin
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN RINGAN PADA PROSES DIVERSI TINGKAT PENYIDIKAN Arfan Kaimuddin
Arena Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2015)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (799.461 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2015.00802.7

Abstract

AbsrtactThis research published as journal is written and motivated by three issues. First is the juridical problems that can be observed from the inconsistency of the Act Number 11 of 2012 on the SPPA from article 1, paragraph (6) of the restorative justice to Article 9 paragraph (2). It has distorted the concept of restorative justice for victims of crime minor theft. The Second is the theoretical issues, that is the right of victims to be protected, but in practice these rights are neglected. the Third issue is the sociological problems that can be observed where the criminal acts of theft committed by a child can interfere with the comfort and safety of the community. This research's objective is to find a basic philosophical formation of Article 9, paragraph (2) of Act No. 11/2012 on SPPA. To describe how should the diversion of the victims of wage theft with losses under local minimum wage was implemented. This journal is written using normative legal research methods. Basic formation of Article 9 (2) Article 9 paragraph (2) of Law No. 11/2012 on SPPA included four main points, three points are meant to protect children in order to avoid prison and then the fourth point is to protect the interests of victims and perpetrators of child. If the victim does not wish to participate, diversion will still run. This philosophical basis is in contrary to the theory of restorative justice and legal protection. In comparison to the Diversion process of Philippines dan Malaysia state, to achieve the ideal form of diversion for criminal offenses minor committed by children in Indonesia is to use a restorative justice approach in a diversion effort. It is supported by the theory of criminal law policy, which is by reformulating and altering the content of Article 9 paragraph (2) of the SPPA. AbsrtakPenulisan jurnal berupa hasil penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh tiga permasalahan. Pertama, permasalahan yuridis yang bisa dicermati dari adanya inkonsistensi dalam UU No. 11 tahun 2012 tentang SPPA yakni antara pasal 1 ayat (6) mengenai restorative justice dengan Pasal 9 ayat (2). Hal ini telah mencederai konsep restorative justice bagi korban tindak pidana pencurian ringan. Kedua, permasalahan teoritis, Hak-hak korban harus dilindungi, namun dalam praktek hak tersebut terabaikan. Ketiga, permasalahan sosiologis yang bisa dicermati ialah Tindak pidana pencurian yang dilakukan oleh anak dapat mengganggu kenyamanan dan keamanan di dalam masyarakat. Tujuan penelitian ini Untuk menemukan dasar filosofis pembentukan Pasal 9 ayat (2) UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 tentang SPPA. Untuk menguraikan bagaimana semestinya proses diversi terhadap korban pencurian yang kerugiannya dibawah upah minum provinsi setempat dilaksanakan. Penulisan jurnal ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Dasar pembentukan Pasal 9 ayat (2) Pasal 9 ayat (2) UU No. 11/2012 tentang SPPAterdapat empat poin utama, tiga poin bertujuan untuk melindungi anak agar terhindar dari penjara kemudian poin keempat yaitu melindungi kepentingan korban dan juga pelaku anak. Apabila korban tidak ingin berpartisipasi, diversi tetap akan dijalankan. Dasar filosofis tersebut bertentangan dengan teori restorative justice dan juga teori perlindungan hukum.Setalah melakukan perbandingan Proses diversi dengan Negara Filiphina dan Malaysia, untuk mencapai bentuk ideal diversi untuk tindak pidana pencurian ringan yang dilakukan oleh anak di Indonesia ialah dengan menggunakan pendekatan restorative justice pada upaya diversi. Hal ini didukungoleh teori kebijakan hukum pidana. Dengan mereformulasi untuk merubah isi dari Pasal 9 ayat (2) UU SPPA.
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI UPAYA MEWUJUDKAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI ANAK YAG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA ASUSILA Arfan Kaimuddin; Rizki Akbar
Negara dan Keadilan Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Negara dan Keadilan
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS ISLAM MALANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/negkea.v13i1.21397

Abstract

Abstrak Perlindungan hukum yang dapat diberikan kepada seorang anak yang berhadap dengan hukum yakni melalui penerapan diversi dan restorative justice sebagai salah satu metode penyelesaian perkara anak di Indonesia. Hal tersebut tentunya dapat menjadi jalan keluar bagi perkara tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak agar diselesaikan diluar peradilan, sehingga anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum tidak merasakan proses peradilan seperti pemeriksaan, penahanan dan sidang dipengadilan. Penulisan ini dilatarbelakangi dengan adanya permasalahan yaitu dari bentuk perlindungan yang diberikan terhadap anak dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia, serta penerapan restorative justice dalam mewujudkan upaya perlindungan anak yang melakukan tindak pidana asusila. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan dalam penulis ini penelitian yuridis normatif. Sedangkan jenis pendekatan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan beberapa pendekatan Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan (statute approach), dan Pendekatan Konseptual (conseptual approach). Abstract Legal protection that can be given to a child in conflict with the law is through the application of diversion and restorative justice as a method of resolving child cases in Indonesia. This of course can be a way out for criminal cases committed by children to be resolved outside the court, so that children in conflict with the law do not feel the judicial process such as examination, detention and trial in court. This writing is motivated by the existence of problems, namely the form of protection provided to children in the laws and regulations in Indonesia, as well as the application of restorative justice in realizing efforts to protect children who commit immoral crimes. The type of research conducted in this author is normative juridical research. While the type of approach in this study uses several approaches to the Legislative Approach (statute approach), and the Conceptual Approach (conceptual approach).
A Double-Edged Sword? Legal Certainty and the Perils of Authority in Indonesia’s Draft Asset Deprivation Act Hisbul Luthfi Ashsyarofi; Arfan Kaimuddin; R.B. Muhammad Zainal Abidin; Bastomi, Ahmad
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024): December, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v19i2.2939

Abstract

The urgency of enacting the Draft Asset Deprivation Act in Indonesia stems from the need to recover assets linked to criminal activities, even in the absence of a conviction. This approach is seen as a preventive measure to safeguard illicitly acquired assets; however, its implementation raises serious legal concerns. The potential violation of property rights—recognized as fundamental human rights—poses risks to justice and legal certainty. The lack of clear procedural safeguards could lead to authority abuse, arbitrary asset seizures, and disproportionate impacts on individuals. This study identifies critical inconsistencies within the draft law. First, the phrase "asset deprivation is only carried out once" in the explanation of Article 3 contradicts Article 5(1)(c), which allows additional asset deprivation if previously seized assets are insufficient. This antinomy undermines legal certainty and fairness. Second, Article 56 permits the auctioning of assets before a final court decision without specifying clear conditions for its application. The absence of rigid legal criteria opens avenues for abuse of authority, further exacerbating risks of injustice. The novelty of this research lies in its critical legal analysis of these contradictions and their implications for property rights and procedural fairness. This research contributes to the global discourse on asset deprivation laws by critically examining the tension between crime prevention and fundamental human rights. The study highlights how ambiguities in legal drafting and the absence of clear procedural safeguards can lead to authority abuse, a challenge faced by many jurisdictions implementing non-conviction-based asset forfeiture (NCB) frameworks. By comparing Indonesia’s Draft Asset Deprivation Act with international best practices, this research offers valuable insights into the legal balance between state power and individual rights, which is crucial in developing laws that do not unduly compromise fundamental freedoms.
Co-Authors Bastomi, Ahmad Hisbul Luthfi Ashsyarofi R.B. Muhammad Zainal Abidin Rizki Akbar