Afif Noor
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

The Legal Basis of Information Technology Based Cofinancing Services in Indonesia Afif Noor; Ali Maskur
Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Vol 4, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/walrev.2022.4.2.13520

Abstract

The rapidly growing information technology-based co-financing service (LPBBTI) in Indonesia requires a forceful legal basis for the parties involved in information technology-based financial services. As a rule-of-law country, Indonesia must make the rule of law the commander in chief and guide behavior. This research seeks to find the legal basis of LPBBTI in the laws and regulations of Indonesia, which is carried out by document study and uses a statute approach. The data obtained were then analyzed qualitatively. This research did not find any legal basis for LPBBTI in the law, but there are several laws related to LPBBTI, such as the Civil Code and Law No. 11 of 2008. The legal basis for LPBBTI specifically only exists in the Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 10/POJK.05/2022 and  No. 13/POJK.02/2018.Layanan Pendanaan Bersama Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (LPBBTI) yang berkembang pesat di Indonesia memerlukan landasan hukum kuat sebagai panduan para pihak yang terlibat dalam layanan keuangan berbasis teknologi informasi tersebut. Indonesia sebagai penganut negara hukum harus menjadikan hukum sebagi panglima dan pedoman dalam bertingkah laku. Penelitian ini berusaha menemukan landasan hukum LPBBTI dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia yang dilakukan dengan studi dokumen dan menggunakan pendekatan statute. Data yang diperoleh kemudian dianalisa secara kualitatif. Penelitian ini tidak menemukan landasan hukum LPBBTI dalam undang-undang tetapi ada beberapa undang-undang yang terkait dengan LPBBTI seperti Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Undang-Undang No. 11 tahun 2008. Dasar Hukum LPBBTI terdapat dalam Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 10/POJK.05/2022 dan No. 13/POJK.02/2018.
Crypto Assets and Regulation: Taxonomy and Framework Regulatory of Crypto Assets in Indonesia Afif Noor; Moh. Arifin; Deni Parama Widia Astuti
JED (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi) Vol 8, No 3 (2023): JED (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi)
Publisher : Universitas of Muhammadiyah Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26618/jed.v8i3.10886

Abstract

Cryptocurrency is a new investment commodity that is growing fast in Indonesia. Crypto assets have different taxonomies from one another. For this reason, this research aims to identify the taxonomy of crypto assets as digital assets and analyze the framework of regulation for crypto assets as an investment commodity in Indonesia using normative juridical methods. This research uses statute and an analytical approach. The research data is taken from secondary data sources. The results study show that to create proper regulation of crypto assets in Indonesia is crucial to classify the types of crypto assets appropriately. Although the Indonesian government has issued several specific rules related to crypto assets, such as Bappebti Regulation No. 8 of 2021, these regulations have not provided sufficient legal certainty and protection for crypto asset users who have a broad dimension and scope as digital assets that can be used as a means of payment and investment and involve cross-sectoral. Therefore, stronger regulations in the form of laws are needed to provide legal protection for cryptooassettusers in Indonesia.
The Role of Donation-Based Crowdfunding Platforms in Improving People's Welfare (Study on the Kitabisa.com) Maria Anna Muryani; Noor Rosyidah; Maliki Alfajr Davin C.S; Afif Noor
JED (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi) Vol 8, No 3 (2023): JED (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi)
Publisher : Universitas of Muhammadiyah Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26618/jed.v8i3.10860

Abstract

Indonesia is a welfare state that is responsible for the welfare of its citizens, this is not an easy thing with high levels of poverty and corruption. It takes the participation of all components of the nation to realize this welfare. The object of this study is to determine the role of donation-based crowdfunding (DCF) platforms in improving people's welfare by focusing on the Kitabisa.com platform. In this study, the problem formulation is the extent to which DCFs such as Kitabisa.com can contribute to improving community welfare. The research method used is qualitative by collecting data through printed and online documents. The results showed that DCF platforms, particularly Kitabisa.com, have helped individuals resolve financial burdens and made it easier for the community to access donations. DCF has a significant role in facilitating financial assistance for individuals and communities in need and is very effective in connecting donors and recipients, providing an easy-to-use interface, and ensuring transparency in the donation process that can have implications for improving people's welfare.
Hukum Politik dalam Praktik: Bagaimana Kekuasaan Politik Mempengaruhi Hasil Hukum di Asia Tenggara Maulana Anwar; Afif Noor
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 1 (2025): September: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/a8t22t48

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of political jurisprudence in Southeast Asia, emphasizing the persistent intersection between judicial institutions and political power. Using qualitative content analysis of regional reports, particularly the UNDP’s Judicial Integrity and Independence in Southeast Asia (2023–2024), the research identifies patterns of external pressure, limited transparency, and constrained judicial ethics across six ASEAN countries. Findings reveal that political influence remains prevalent in judicial appointments, decision-making, and resource allocation, reflecting structural dependence on the executive branch. Informal mechanisms such as patronage networks, selective sanctions, and budgetary control further weaken judicial autonomy and discourage resistance to political authority. These dynamics foster a culture of strategic conformity, where judicial decisions often align with dominant political interests rather than constitutional or human rights principles. Consequently, public trust in judicial integrity erodes, undermining both democratic accountability and access to justice. The study concludes that enhancing judicial independence in Southeast Asia requires not only institutional reform but also cultural transformation within the judiciary promoting ethical resilience, transparency, and professional integrity to resist political co-optation and strengthen the rule of law.