Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal BUANA GENDER : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan The Prosecutor Law Review
Cecep Mustafa
Stirling University
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Empowerment of Women with Narcotic Cases Nurhayati; Rita Komalasari; Cecep Mustafa
BUANA GENDER : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2537.284 KB) | DOI: 10.22515/bg.v7i1.5378

Abstract

This paper for the first time presents the results of research related to the aspects of empowerment of women involved in narcotic cases. The research methods presented in this paper are in the form of literature research and field research. Two countries, Scotland and Indonesia, were included to gain various perspectives through a literature review. The results of the field research show that the empowerment of women with narcotic cases is still based on a sense of social justice. This paper contributes to ensuring equality in empowerment for women.
Electronic Evidence in The Healthy Justice System: Reimagined Rita Komalasari; Cecep Mustafa
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12, No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.547-580

Abstract

This study addresses one of the critical difficulties related to the admissibility of electronic evidence. This essay examines the reliability of electronic evidence in foreign criminal and civil justice systems and offers suggestions for revising the reliability of electronic evidence in Indonesian court processes. In terms of the legitimacy of electronic evidence in the criminal justice system, the method adopted is the present comparative policy approach in various nations. The paper presents the concept of a rapid check mechanism for verifying electronic evidence, which swiftly advances the settlement of criminal and civil cases.
Addressing Willful Blindness: A Multi-Domain Framework for Enhancing Legal Accountability and Fairness Cecep Mustafa
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13, No 3 (2024)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.3.2024.551-584

Abstract

Willful blindness, a legal doctrine in which individuals deliberately avoid knowledge to escape accountability, plays a significant role in the adjudication of crimes such as corporate fraud, financial misconduct, and sexual assault. However, current research has not fully examined its strategic misuse or provided a comprehensive analysis of its application across different legal contexts. This study bridges these gaps by introducing a Multi-Domain Analytical Framework to evaluate the concept's impact, strategic use, and broader implications in both criminal and civil cases. Empirical findings reveal that willful blindness is often employed to evade legal responsibility, undermining justice and compromising the fairness of legal outcomes. The study further demonstrates the inadequacy of existing legal standards and evidentiary requirements in addressing this issue. To counter these challenges, the research proposes targeted policy reforms designed to strengthen accountability, enhance evidentiary clarity, and improve the overall fairness and effectiveness of the legal system. In conclusion, willful blindness remains a critical and manipulative tool with profound implications for justice and accountability. This study highlights the necessity of reforming legal frameworks to mitigate the strategic exploitation of willful blindness. By setting the stage for further research and policy development, the findings contribute to the ongoing evolution of a more just and equitable legal system capable of addressing the complexities of modern legal challenges.
Electronic Evidence in The Healthy Justice System: Reimagined Rita Komalasari; Cecep Mustafa
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.547-580

Abstract

This study addresses one of the critical difficulties related to the admissibility of electronic evidence. This essay examines the reliability of electronic evidence in foreign criminal and civil justice systems and offers suggestions for revising the reliability of electronic evidence in Indonesian court processes. In terms of the legitimacy of electronic evidence in the criminal justice system, the method adopted is the present comparative policy approach in various nations. The paper presents the concept of a rapid check mechanism for verifying electronic evidence, which swiftly advances the settlement of criminal and civil cases.
Penuntutan Aset Digital: Penyitaan Aset Kripto Rita Komalasari; cecep mustafa
The Prosecutor Law Review Vol 4 No 2 (2026): The Prosecutor Law Review
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum, Kejaksaan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the role of cryptocurrency seizures in the prosecution of crypto-related crimes, focusing on the legal and procedural hurdles prosecutors face, as well as the broader implications for crime deterrence. The purpose of this study is to assess how successful cryptocurrency seizures contribute to the recovery of illicit assets and serve as a deterrent, reducing the financial incentives for criminal activities. This research methodology involves an analysis of high-profile cases, including the Silk Road investigation, Operation Disruptor, and the Bitfinex hack, where prosecutors played a pivotal role in securing cryptocurrency seizures and ensuring successful prosecutions. These cases highlight how the effective use of digital forensics and blockchain analysis has enabled prosecutors to navigate complex legal landscapes, leading to the successful conviction of criminals and the recovery of assets. The results demonstrate that effective cryptocurrency seizures, coupled with skilled prosecution, can lead to a notable reduction in crypto-related crimes, with a 15% decline in such crimes reported in regions with proven prosecution capabilities. Additionally, the public visibility of these seizures enhances the credibility of prosecutorial efforts, fostering greater trust in the justice system’s ability to combat digital crime. The conclusion underscores the necessity for continued investment in prosecutor training, international collaboration, and the development of advanced forensic tools to strengthen prosecution efforts in the digital age. The study also recommends policy reforms to better equip prosecutors with the resources and legal frameworks needed to address the evolving threats posed by cryptocurrency in modern criminal activity.
Co-Authors Nurhayati Rita Komalasari