Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Jurnal Pengabdian Literasi Digital Indonesia Ipso Jure Leges Privatae
Revie Kurnia Katjong
Universitas YAPIS Papua
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Penyuluhan Hukum Berkas Digital Pembebasan Tanah Adat di Kabupaten Sarmi Andrian Sah; Suwito Suwito; Revie Kurnia Katjong; Jusmawati Jusmawati; Irsan Irsan; Wahyudi BR; Asmarani Ramli
Jurnal Pengabdian Literasi Digital Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): June
Publisher : Puslitbang Akademi Relawan TIK Indonesia (ARTIKA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57119/abdimas.v2i1.22

Abstract

In 1997 the government has regulated the policy of Granting Ownership Rights for Very Simple Houses and Simple Houses through KMNA/KBPN No. 9 of 1997 and KMNA/KBPN No. 6 of 1998 concerning the Granting of Property Rights for Residential Houses. The existence of this decision is very beneficial for landowners and residential houses in housing complexes built by developers and for Indonesian citizens who own land with Building Use Rights for residential homes to have the convenience of obtaining changes in land rights to ownership rights. To address that in laws and regulations, regulations regarding changes in the status of Building Use Rights to Property Rights, it is deemed necessary to provide counseling/lectures so that the community in Dok IX Jayapura Utara Province of Papua knows the process and obstacles encountered in changing the status of Building Use Rights become property. Counseling/lectures on the topic of changing the status of Building Use Rights to Property Rights involved lecturers at the Faculty of Law at Yapis University in Papua as a service team and involved Lecturers at the Faculty of Law at Yapis University in Papua. The community service activities carried out at IX Jayapura Utara, Papua Province, can be said to have been carried out well as expected.act.
Uang Panai And Its Legality: When Tradition Intersects With Civil Law Rizky Wisudawan Katjong; Revie Kurnia Katjong
Leges Privatae Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): OCTOBER-JOY
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/n2tq2002

Abstract

This study examines the legal position of uang panai, a traditional form of payment in Bugis-Makassar marriage customs, within Indonesia’s civil law system. The practice, deeply rooted in local culture, symbolizes respect, social status, and familial honor. However, its contemporary implementation often intersects with the formal legal order, raising questions regarding its classification as a lawful civil contract, a conditional gift, or an adat-based moral obligation. Using a normative juridical approach, this article analyzes relevant provisions of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), the 1945 Constitution, and Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power, alongside empirical findings from legal and sociological studies. The results show that while uang panai fulfills the elements of a binding agreement under Article 1320 of the Civil Code, its absence of written documentation and inconsistent enforcement create legal uncertainty. The state’s constitutional recognition of customary law under Article 18B(2) of the Constitution remains largely declarative rather than substantive. Consequently, disputes involving uang panai are often settled through informal adat forums without enforceable legal authority. To harmonize tradition and modern law, this research recommends the formulation of local regulations (peraturan daerah) and the development of judicial precedents that establish fair, proportional, and gender-sensitive standards for customary contracts. Such legal integration would ensure that uang panai remains a respected cultural practice while achieving the legal certainty and justice mandated by Indonesia’s civil law framework.
Who Owns Ai-Generated Content? Examining Copyright Challenges in The Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence Rizky Wisudawan Katjong; Revie Kurnia Katjong
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 6 (2026): Ipso Jure - July
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/m2vbag14

Abstract

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence technologies such as large language models and image diffusion models has fundamentally changed the landscape of creative work, as machines are now capable of producing text, images, music, and audiovisuals with a level of sophistication that resembles human work, thus giving rise to legal uncertainty regarding who is entitled to be called the creator and copyright holder of such content. This article aims to critically examine the conceptual and normative challenges faced by the copyright regime, particularly Indonesian copyright law, in responding to the phenomenon of works produced by generative artificial intelligence, by placing the principles of legal flexibility and adaptability as the main analytical framework amidst global technological disruption. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative legal approach, by examining relevant primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, including developments in decisions and policies in the United States, China, and Indonesia. The study results show that the requirements of authenticity and human authorization that are the foundation of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright have not explicitly anticipated works born from autonomous generative processes, thus creating a normative vacuum regarding the legal status of artificial intelligence outputs, responsibility for copyright infringement in the data training process, and the division of ownership between users, platform developers, and training data providers.
Pengaruh Kepastians Hukum, Kepercayaan Digital, dan Persepsi Risiko terhadap Minat Penggunaan Smart Contract Berbasis Blockchain di Indonesia Rizky Wisudawan Katjong; Revie Kurnia Katjong
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JHPIS)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v5i3.6720

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of legal certainty, digital trust, and perceived risk on the intention to use blockchain-based smart contracts in Indonesia. This research employed an explanatory quantitative approach involving an accessible population of 100 respondents, including digital business actors, digital financial service users, technology-based MSME actors, law/economics/informatics students, legal practitioners, and blockchain technology users. Data were collected using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire and analyzed through SEM-PLS using SmartPLS. The findings reveal that legal certainty has a positive and significant effect on the intention to use smart contracts, digital trust is the most dominant factor in increasing usage intention, while perceived risk has a negative and significant effect. The R-square value of 0.647 indicates that the three variables explain 64.7% of the variation in smart contract usage intention. The implications of this study highlight the need to strengthen regulation, improve platform security and transparency, and educate users to support safer, more trustworthy, and sustainable smart contract adoption in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Andrian Sah Asmarani Ramli Irsan Irsan Jusmawati Jusmawati Rizky Wisudawan Katjong Suwito Suwito Wahyudi BR