Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal jurnal penelitian multidisiplin
Ahmat Yusuf Al Amin
Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Public Health

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KEDUDUKAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DI INDONESIA DAN PENERAPAN YURISPRUDENSI DALAM KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI: Kewenangan, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Yurisprudensi Ahmat Yusuf Al Amin; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.110

Abstract

Indonesia is a constitutional democracy that bases its democracy on a rule of law, with the understanding that the Constitution is the highest law and must be the basis for all state administration. The Constitutional Court is necessary to serve as the guardian of the constitution and to fulfill Indonesia's aspirations to be a democratic nation because of its function in the country's constitutional framework and the effectiveness of its mechanism for reviewing laws. country depending on the law. The following findings can be reached through the use of normative legal research techniques: 1. In accordance with the provisions of Article 24C paragraphs (1) and (2), the Constitutional Court has the power to hear cases at the first and final levels in relation to constitutional law violations, disputes over the legitimacy of state institutions, the dissolution of political parties, and cases involving the outcome of general elections. With this authority, it is clear that the Constitutional Court cooperates with all state institutions, especially when there is a dispute between state institutions or when a procedure for reviewing a law occurs and the institution wants the involvement of the Constitutional Court, 2. The Supreme Court and other courts within its scope is not obliged to accept the authority of the Constitutional Court, and the Constitutional Court itself is also free to exercise its own jurisdiction.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MELALUI UPAYA ADMINISTRATIF: Prosedur, Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara, Administrasi Pemerintahan Ahmat Yusuf Al Amin; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.111

Abstract

Implementation of the December 4, 2018-issued Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number: 6 of 2018 concerning Guidelines for Settlement of State Administrative Disputes After Pursuing Administrative Actions, which is an additional regulation of the provisions of Articles 75, 76, and 77 of Law Number 30 In Indonesia, a change was made to the state administrative justice system in 2014. The question of whether administrative effort is necessary before bringing state administrative problems before the State Administrative Court is inevitably raised by this change in governance. Second, how do administrative complaints to PTUN get resolved?
Co-Authors Arif Wibowo