Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.44
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal jurnal penelitian multidisiplin
Arif Wibowo
Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Public Health

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search

 1 
Penerapan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah: Regulasi Penyelesaian Pilkada, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Hak Konstitusional Ahmad Shodiqin; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.89

Abstract

This research aims to determine the implementation of the provisional authority mandated to the Constitutional Court in resolving election results disputes and this research also aims to determine the impact and effectiveness of the implementation of the election settlement regulations regarding the provision of vote difference thresholds. This study used the library research research method in collaboration with observation or observation methods. The number of cases registered with the Constitutional Court was 53 cases, while only 7 cases passed and advanced to the trial process. The results of the study show that the administration is systematically structured and is still the main argument by the litigants for the sake of overriding the threshold provisions. The implementation of the authority of the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes follows substantial justice while remaining obedient to the constitution, as well as an effort to protect citizens' constitutional rights. However, on the other hand, the element of legal certainty in carrying out the mandate of the Pilkada law for the disputing parties was not fully fulfilled.
EFEKTIFITAS EKSEKUSI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DI INDONESIA : Peradilan, Tata Usaha Negara, Eksekusi Putusan, Efektifitas Nur Indra Socawibawa; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.94

Abstract

Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara yang dapat dilaksanakan adalah putusan yang telah mempunyai kekuatan hukum tetap, yaitu suatu putusan yang tak dapat diubah lagi melalui suatu upaya hukum (Pasal 115 UPTUN). Dalam pelaksanaan putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara tidak dimungkinkan adanya upaya paksa dengan menggunakan aparat keamanan, seperti halnya dalam pelaksanaan putusan Peradilan Pidana dan Peradilan Perdata. Tetapi istimewanya dalam pelaksanaan putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dimungkinkan campur tangan Presiden sebagai Kepala Pemerintahan yang bertanggung jawab dalam pembinaan aparatur pemerintahan juga bertanggung jawab agar setiap aparatur pemerintahan dapat mentaati semua peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku termasuk mentaati Putusan Pengadilan sesuai dengan prinsip Negara hukum yang kita anut. Campur tangan presiden diperlukan karena yang bersangkutan adalah orang atau badan hukum Perdata dengan Badan atau Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara dan yang dapat digugat di Pengadilan di lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara adalah Badan atau Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara yang dapat mengeluarkan suatu putusan Tata Usaha Negara.
PERPANJANGAN KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PEMBUBARAN PARTAI POLITIK YANG KORUPSI DI INDONESIA: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Pembubaran Partai Politik, Koruptor Partai Leona Putri Sari; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.97

Abstract

After the amendment of the Constitution of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 changed the constitutional system in Indonesia, since the birth of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia which was authorized to adjudicate the dissolution of political parties up to now has never been done by the Constitutional Court, the debate over the dissolution of political parties is also seen as a violation of the rights of political parties. Human rights as the right to assemble and associate, the state administration thought continues to develop about the dissolution of corrupt political parties by giving authority to the Constitutional Court.This research was conducted with normative legal research whose data is sourced from secondary data and since this research data is secondary data, it is included in the type of normative legal research. The nature of this research is descriptive, which aims to provide an overview of social phenomena about the expansion of the authority of the Constitutional Court in the Disbanding of a Corrupt Political Party. Sources of research data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The method of data collection is done using document study techniques, which are analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques.
Mengenal Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Untuk Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Baik (selayar pandang PTUN): State Administrative Court, Policy, Authority Melani Safitri; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.100

Abstract

The rule of law requires that every action or action taken by public authorities or the government has a clear law or legality based on both written and unwritten laws. The government must be neutral and impartial, before all groups in society, and serve the public interest. But in practice, the terms "in the public interest", "development of the whole society", "the state must not harm its citizens" and similar phrases appear repeatedly. political statements by state officials or high-ranking officials, used as a justification for using state power to force a person or group of citizens to comply with the wishes of the government. In order to realize a just and prosperous national and state life order, the government must have a legal system to resolve disputes within society and between the people themselves, the people and the government and government agencies. The State Administrative Court is one of the courts formed by the government to resolve state administrative disputes. The State Administrative Court has the role of adjudicating or settling disputes between the State or State Administration in the State Administrative Court of State Administrative Court officials which was ratified in 1986 by Law Number 51 of 2009 which states that State Administration is a State Administration which has roles and duties in resolving state administrative issues both at the central and regional levels, receiving, investigating, adjudicating and resolving state administrative disputes, so that PTUN has new competencies or tasks in resolving disputes, namely. disputes, diverted in the general election procedure. The problems in this study are First, what are the roles and responsibilities of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) in resolving election disputes in PTUN procedural law? Second, what is the view of siyasa qadhaiyyah regarding the role and function of the State Administrative Court in resolving election disputes? The purpose of this study is to determine the role and duties of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) in resolving election disputes from a procedural viewpoint of the State Administrative Court and to study the opinions of the siyasa qadhaiyyah regarding these roles and tasks. . from the government. to the state administrative court in the settlement of election disputes. The type of research used in this research is field research using various literature, the data analysis method used in this research is data analysis using qualitative inductive and deductive reasoning methods. Based on the research results, researchers can draw the following conclusions: First, the role and function of constitutional law in resolving disputes or differences of opinion in the election process is relatively the same as state administrative disputes in general, namely. investigate, adjudicate and resolve state administrative disputes through individual, final and binding decisions whose decisions are made. have civil consequences. Second, the views of siyasa qadhaiyyah (judiciary) on the role and function of the Administrative Court in resolving election disputes come to monitor/control the authorities and investigate the tyranny of the rulers against their people, including election procedural policies that can harm the people or the people. voters and administrative courts as well as their decisions will commit crimes, and there is no tyranny over people's rights.
INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN HUKUM ACARA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI: Independensi, Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Mahkamah Konstitusi Nur Indra Socawibawa; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.103

Abstract

One important factor in the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is the existence of the Constitutional Court as a state institution whose function is to settle a number of cases in the field of constitutional law. country. The constitution must be implemented responsibly, in accordance with the will of the people and the ideals of democracy. The constitutional authority of the Constitutional Court is to carry out the principle of checks and balances which places all state institutions in the same position to have a balance in the administration of the state. The existence of the Constitutional Court is a real step forward in the joint regulation of the functioning of federal agencies. The Constitutional Court in administering its judiciary to consider, adjudicate and decide cases, always refers to the principle of administering justice, which is carried out simply and quickly.
ADMINISTRASI PERKARA DAN PERSIDANGAN DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA SECARA ELEKTRONIK : Penyelesaian Perkara, Persidangan Elektronik, Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Umi Qalsum; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.104

Abstract

Dalam  mewujudkan  amanat  konstitusi  untuk menegakkan hukum dan keadilan, Peradilan harus  dilakukan  dengan  sederhana,  cepat  dan  biaya  ringansebagaimana  dinyatakan  oleh  Undang-Undang  Nomor  48  Tahun  2009  Dalam upaya mewujudkan Peradilan sederhana,  cepat  dan biaya  ringan   sesuai dengan  tuntutan  perkembangan teknologi informasi  tersebut, perlu  diterapkan penyelesaian   perkara  secara  daring  (online)   Persidangan  elektronik  (e-court) telah  diatur  oleh  Mahkamah  Agung  jauh  sebelum  terjadinya  pandemi  Covid-19 dengan diterbitkannya  PERMA No  3  Tahun  2018  dan  diperbaharui  dengan PERMA  No 1  Tahun  2019   Persidangan elektronik  ini sejalan dan  mendukung penerapan  asas-asas   umum   peradilan  yang  baik,   sehingga   dapat   mencegah perilaku   maladministrasi  dan  koruptif   Penerapan  Peradilan  Elektronik  sangat membantu   terwujudnya   Visi  Mahkamah   Agung   menjadi   Badan Peradilan Indonesia  Yang  Agung,  yang  pada  point  ke-10  perwujudan  Visi   Mahkamah Agung  dalam  cetak  biru  Pembaruan  Peradilan  2010-2035  adalah mewujudkan Badan    Peradilan   Modern   dengan berbasis Teknologi   Informasi   terpadu  Dalam  konteks  peradilan   elektronik   di lingkungan Peradilan   Tata   Usaha Negara,  tidak    ada   asas-asas   umum peradilan    yang    baik yang   tidak Sesuai   dengan, Peradilan   Elektronik  Sebaliknya,  Peradilan  Elektronik   sangat mendukung  terwujudnya asas-asas umum peradilan yang baik dalam pelaksanaan tugas peradilan
KEDUDUKAN DAN WEWENANG MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA : Wewenang, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia Masrufah; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.108

Abstract

Institutionally or in the organizational system, the existence of the Constitutional Court as one of the judicial bodies that is not under the Supreme Court, like other judicial bodies and this means that there are two highest judicial bodies in judicial power, namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. The problem that already exists is how the function and position of the Constitutional Court is in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia. The position of the Constitutional Court as an independent State institution in the judicial sector and has implications for the Supreme Court, if previously the position of the Supreme Court was the highest Judicial Body which oversees all Courts in the Republic of Indonesia, now there is a judicial body which is not under, even its position is equal to The Supreme Court, namely the Constitutional Court and even the Constitutional Court through its constitutional authority to review the constitutionality of laws, can postpone the exercise of the Supreme Court's authority in examining laws and regulations whose level is below the law against laws.
PERIHAL PUTUSAN DAN UPAYA HUKUM DI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA: Putusan, Upaya Hukum, Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Masrufah; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.109

Abstract

Indonesia as a rule of law requires all actions or deeds of the authorities, therefore Indonesia has an independent judiciary in administering judicial power to uphold the law. In Indonesia, the State Administrative Court was formed with the aim of realizing the nation's and state's life order which guarantees the equality of citizens in the law. The research method used at this writing is to use normative legal research methods. where normative legal research here can be interpreted as research aimed at examining the quality of the legal norms themselves. In the state administrative court, of course, there are matters regarding decisions and legal remedies. Therefore it can be defined that a decision according to the legal dictionary is the result of examining a case. Meanwhile, the implementation of decisions in law is a determinant of the success of the judicial control system on government attitudes and actions in the system of public protection against government actions. In addition to the existence of a decision, it is also accompanied by legal remedies where legal remedies are the right of the defeated party not to accept the court's decision, in the form of resistance or appeal or cassation or the right to submit a request for review in the case of demanding the method stipulated in the law.
KEDUDUKAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DI INDONESIA DAN PENERAPAN YURISPRUDENSI DALAM KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI: Kewenangan, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Yurisprudensi Ahmat Yusuf Al Amin; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.110

Abstract

Indonesia is a constitutional democracy that bases its democracy on a rule of law, with the understanding that the Constitution is the highest law and must be the basis for all state administration. The Constitutional Court is necessary to serve as the guardian of the constitution and to fulfill Indonesia's aspirations to be a democratic nation because of its function in the country's constitutional framework and the effectiveness of its mechanism for reviewing laws. country depending on the law. The following findings can be reached through the use of normative legal research techniques: 1. In accordance with the provisions of Article 24C paragraphs (1) and (2), the Constitutional Court has the power to hear cases at the first and final levels in relation to constitutional law violations, disputes over the legitimacy of state institutions, the dissolution of political parties, and cases involving the outcome of general elections. With this authority, it is clear that the Constitutional Court cooperates with all state institutions, especially when there is a dispute between state institutions or when a procedure for reviewing a law occurs and the institution wants the involvement of the Constitutional Court, 2. The Supreme Court and other courts within its scope is not obliged to accept the authority of the Constitutional Court, and the Constitutional Court itself is also free to exercise its own jurisdiction.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MELALUI UPAYA ADMINISTRATIF: Prosedur, Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara, Administrasi Pemerintahan Ahmat Yusuf Al Amin; Arif Wibowo
Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol 2 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Publisher : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58705/jpm.v2i1.111

Abstract

Implementation of the December 4, 2018-issued Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number: 6 of 2018 concerning Guidelines for Settlement of State Administrative Disputes After Pursuing Administrative Actions, which is an additional regulation of the provisions of Articles 75, 76, and 77 of Law Number 30 In Indonesia, a change was made to the state administrative justice system in 2014. The question of whether administrative effort is necessary before bringing state administrative problems before the State Administrative Court is inevitably raised by this change in governance. Second, how do administrative complaints to PTUN get resolved?
Co-Authors Ahmad Shodiqin Ahmat Yusuf Al Amin Leona Putri Sari Masrufah Melani Safitri Nur Indra Socawibawa Nur Indra Socawibawa Umi Qalsum