Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Lingkungan dan Pembangunan Ibu Kota Negara (IKN) Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Yanti Fristikawati; Nugroho Adipradana
Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 7, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/justisia.v7i2.15586

Abstract

The development of new city, as well as the development of the new capital city of the Indonesia, will certainly have both positive and negative impacts. Some experts and NGOs assess that the development of the State Capital (IKN) will have a negative impact on the local community and the environment, but the government has made various efforts to reduce this adverse impact. This paper will discuss the pro and contra of IKN development, and what efforts have been made by the government and the existing regulations. The research method is a normative juridical method, which is a method that uses analysis from secondary data in the form of regulations and also expert opinions from books and journals. The government has made various efforts to protect the environment in the development of IKN, including making Law number 3 of 2022 concerning IKN. In addition, several other rules related to environmental protection will also be applied. The local government of East Kalimantan also has several regional regulations that can be applied to protect the environment in the development of IKN. It is hoped that with the application of appropriate rules and the efforts made by the government to protect the environment in the development of IKN.Keywords : Environmental protection, New Indonesian CapitalĀ 
Specialized Health Courts for National Health Insurance Disputes in Indonesia Siradj Okta; Dedy Yudhistira; Nugroho Adipradana; Fachrudin Sembiring; Kris Tumbel
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Vol 5 No 7 (2026): July
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v5i7.1143

Abstract

Indonesia's National Health Insurance (Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional, JKN) has integrated healthcare financing and administration into a single national system, yet the institutions responsible for resolving healthcare disputes remain divided across multiple jurisdictions. This institutional divergence has become increasingly significant as healthcare disputes now extend beyond medical negligence and insurance reimbursement to encompass administrative decision-making, contractual relationships, professional accountability, and the constitutional right to health. This article examines whether Indonesia's existing judicial framework remains capable of adjudicating disputes generated by an integrated healthcare system. It first analyses the legal characteristics of disputes arising under JKN and the fragmentation of their resolution across existing institutions. It then evaluates the institutional limitations of the current framework through doctrinal and comparative legal analysis. The article argues that the principal challenge lies not in the absence of legal remedies but in the allocation of adjudicatory jurisdiction. Although existing institutions perform legitimate statutory functions, no single forum possesses the institutional capacity to resolve the interconnected legal and technical issues presented by contemporary healthcare disputes. It concludes that a specialized health court represents a constitutionally compatible institutional response to the evolving demands of Indonesia's healthcare governance and access to justice.