Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal CHARISTHEO: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen Rerum: Journal of Biblical Practice
Marthin Steven Lumingkewas
STT Moriah
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Indonesian Gender Justice In School Education Marthin Steven Lumingkewas; Antonius Missa; Magdalena Indriani Suparlim
RERUM: Journal of Biblical Practice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): RERUM: The Journal of Biblical Practice
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Moriah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (785.377 KB) | DOI: 10.55076/rerum.v1i1.12

Abstract

Equality in obtaining education for children, especially girls in rural areas of Indonesia often encounter cultural, religious and ideological barriers from the community.  Educational opportunities are more open to boys than girls for a variety of reasons such as consideration of higher tuition fees, lack of educational facilities and cultural understanding that sees girls as second-grade individuals who can be sacrificed their rights. This subordination of girls is even recorded in a series of education policies that place women as the owners of domestic authority and men to be priests or the backbone of the family. Therefore, in this research using a feminist-sociology approach is expected to provide the results of paradigm changes and perspectives from the government and all elements of society in reviewing the educational curriculum that has so as not to maintain the model gender biased and unfriendly education towards girls' rights in obtaining an education equivalent to that of boys.
Eskatologis Matius Dalam Perspektif Nubuatan Hosea Timotius Timotius; Marthin Steven Lumingkewas
CHARISTHEO: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen Vol 2, No 2 (2023): Maret 2023
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Anugrah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54592/jct.v2i2.77

Abstract

This study aims to straighten out the accusation that Matthew as the author of the Gospel of Matthew has misinterpreted Hosea 11:1 which is quoted by him in Matthew 2:15. There are scholars accusing Matthew of misinterpreting Hosea 11:1 when saying Matthew 2:15 is the fulfillment of what was prophesied by the prophet Hosea, because Hosea 11:1 is actually a historical reflection not prophecy. On the other hand, other scholars say that Matthew did not misinterpret Hosea 11:1, because this is the way the New Testament writers used the Old Testament. Where they can direct to Christ. In this study, the author uses the literature research method as a reference in describing the problems studied. The final result of this study, the author will show that Matthew did not misinterpret Hosea 11:1, because Matthew wrote this Gospel under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, the Exodus is indeed Messianic Eschatology, and Matthew uses the Correspondence Analogy method when interpreting Hosea 11:1 so that Matthew 2:5 is a fulfillment of the prophecy of the prophet Hosea. ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan meluruskan tuduhan bahwa Matius sebagai penulis Injil Matius telah salah menafsirkan Hosea 11:1 yang dikutip olehnya dalam Matius 2:15. Ada sarjana menuduh Matius telah salah menafsirkan Hosea 11:1 pada saat mengatakan Matius 2:15 merupakan penggenapan dari apa yang dinubuatkan oleh nabi Hosea, karena sebenarnya Hosea 11:1 merupakan sebuah refleksi sejarah bukan nubuatan. Sebaliknya sarjana lain mengatakan bahwa Matius tidak salah menafsirkan Hosea 11:1, karena ini merupakan cara penulis Perjanjian Baru dalam menggunakan Perjanjian Lama. Di  mana mereka bisa langsung mengarahkan kepada Kristus. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis memakai metode penelitian literatur sebagai acuan dalam mendeskripsikan masalah yang  dikaji.  Hasil akhir dari penelitian ini, penulis menunjukkan bahwa Matius tidak salah menafsirkan Hosea 11:1, dikarenakan Matius menulis Injil ini dibawah inspirasi dari Roh Kudus. Peristiwa Keluaran memang bersifat Eskatologi Mesianik, dan Matius memakai metode Analogi korespondensi pada saat menafsirkan Hosea 11:1, sehingga Matius 2:5 merupakan penggenapan dari nubuat nabi Hosea. Kata Kunci: Matius; Hosea; Penggenapan; Penafsiran; Yesus. 
Co-Authors Magdalena Indriani Suparlim Missa, Antonius Timotius Timotius