Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.006
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Justice Voice
Arivan Halim
Universitas Krisnadwipayana
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Construction of Dispute Resolution Mining Land Overlapping with Plantation Land Arivan Halim
Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 2 No. 8 (2023): Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/ijoms.v2i8.522

Abstract

Indonesian Agrarian Law recognizes the principle of horizontal separation which has consequences for classifying land rights. One of the granting and acquisition of land rights can be given to mining and plantation businesses. Even so, the granting of land rights to these two types of businesses still generates a lot of disputes . The dispute that occurred was overlapping in the granting of business licenses to mining businesses and/or plantation businesses, based on State Administration decisions issued by State Administration Officials that were not in accordance with statutory regulations and did not heed the General Principles of Good Governance in particular the principle of precision. The purpose of this scientific work is to provide a legal construction for resolving disputes over overlapping mining land and plantation land. The author uses a way of reviewing the applicable laws and regulations, existing theories and principles critically and systematically. The legal constructions offered are civil lawsuit to request compensation through the District Court to the State Administrative Officer who made the State Administrative Decision after the issuance of the State Administrative Court Decision which has a ruling granting the claim to cancel the State Administrative Decision which caused losses and has permanent legal force.
Judicial control over government’s abuse of authority through administrative and corruption law Abdul Latif; Arivan Halim
Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/ijoms.v3i2.732

Abstract

Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, prohibits abuse of authority by government agencies/officials both central and regional, but in practice there are often acts of abuse of authority of Government Agencies/Officials. This paper describes how Judicial Control over abuse of authority through government administrative legal means and Corruption Criminal Acts which, in practice, cause controversy in the enforcement of corruption crimes, especially by Government Officials and State Civil Apparatus. The legal approach to the above problems is carried out by normatively analyzing the laws and regulations governing the prohibition of abuse of power according to Government Administration Law and the Sociology approach according to the practice and / or decision of the Court in the enforcement of corruption crimes committed by organs / bodies of Government officials or State Civil Apparatus. From the results of the study of these problems in the paper, it can be concluded that abuse of authority in government administration is a form of preventive restriction. Meanwhile, abusing authority in the Criminal Law is a form of repressive action. Abuse of authority stipulated in Article 20 of the UUAP is interpreted as an administrative error committed by government agencies/officials, but if there are legal consequences in the form of state financial losses, it is qualified as a criminal act of corruption.
Prinsip Resiprositas dalam Sengketa Kepailitan Lintas Batas Negara (Cross-Border Insolvency) Halim, Arivan
Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 17, No 4 : Al Qalam (Juli 2023)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an (STIQ) Amuntai Kalimantan Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35931/aq.v17i4.2368

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan kebenaran koherensi, menghasilkan argumentasi hukum, teori hukum atau konsep baru prinsip resiprositas sengketa kepailitan lintas batas negara (Cross-Border Insolvency). Tipe Penelitian ini dikualifikasikan ke dalam tipe penelitian hukum Legal Research.  Penelitian hukum merupakan suatu kegiatan know-how dalam ilmu hukum, bukan sekedar know-about. Sebagai kegiatan know-how, penelitian hukum dilakukan untuk memecahkan isu hukum yang dihadapi. Sehingga memberikan dreskripsi mengenai apa yang seyogyanya atas isu hukum yang telah dirumuskan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa instrumen hukum kepailitan Indonesia hingga saat ini belum secara jelas mengatur mengenai kepailitan lintas batas negara (Cross-Border Insolvency), terutama dalam hal status harta atau aset debitur pailit yang berada di luar yurisdiksi hukum Republik Indonesia.
The Principle of Universality in Cross-Border Insolvency Disputes Arivan Halim; Elizabeth Irianti Mayangsari Runtu
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): New Edition of Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i1.4746

Abstract

Cross-border bankruptcy cases often involve legal processes in various jurisdictions, such as those between FM and its creditors in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia, and between Bankrupt Debtors and Curators in Singapore. This underscores the need for harmonization of cross-border bankruptcy laws. The principle of universality in cross-border bankruptcy disputes becomes crucial to address this issue. This research aims to analyze the philosophical foundation of the universality principle in cross-border bankruptcy disputes and how this principle is applied in various international legal instruments and applicable laws and regulations in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative juridical approach, examining various international legal instruments such as the UNCITRAL Model Law and European Council Regulation No. 1346/2000, as well as relevant national legislation. Data were collected through literature review and analysis of legal documents. The universality principle allows for recognition and cooperation among countries in resolving cross-border bankruptcy disputes, thus enabling the efficient and fair administration of debtor's bankruptcy assets worldwide. The application of this principle provides benefits such as debt settlement certainty, more secure asset organization, lower administration costs, better dispute resolution predictions, and fairer debt settlement distribution. However, there are also criticisms regarding foreign laws governing domestic relationships and uncertainty in determining the debtor's home country. Concrete cases in Indonesia and Singapore demonstrate how the universality principle is applied in practice, with Singapore adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency and the Philippines preparing the Corporate Recovery Act to accommodate international business developments.
Kedudukan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) yang Dibuat Pengembang Dalam Pre Project Selling Halim, Arivan
Justice Voice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Justice Voice
Publisher : Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Krisnadwipayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (283.082 KB) | DOI: 10.37893/jv.v1i2.192

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui kedudukan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) yang memiliki klausul-klausul baku yang hanya dibuat oleh satu pihak, yaitu pengembang (developer) perumahan atau rumah susun. Klausul-klausul baku yang tertuang dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) tidak boleh melanggar ketentuan Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, dan secara a contrario dapat dikatakan sah jika tidak melanggar ketentuan Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dan Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgelijk Wetboek). Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundangan-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) serta menyajikan gambaran lengkap mengenai sosial atau dimaksudkan untuk eksplorasi dan klarifikasi secara deskriptif. Keberlakuan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) yang dibuat oleh pengembang (developer) apakah sudah sesuai dengan Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor 11/PRTM/2019 tentang Sistem Perjanjian Pendahuluan Jual Beli Rumah.
Co-Authors Abdul Latif Elizabeth Irianti Mayangsari Runtu