Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Social Research IUS FACTI : Jurnal Berkala Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Karno
Chrisbiantoro Chrisbiantoro
Universitas Bung Karno
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PENYELESAIAN PELANGGARAN HAM BERAT MASA LALU Chrisbiantoro Chrisbiantoro
JOS Vol 1, No 2 Desember (2022): IUS FACTI : Jurnal Berkala Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Karno
Publisher : IUS FACTI : Jurnal Berkala Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bung Karno

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.356 KB)

Abstract

Abstrak Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Berat Masa Lalu adalah sebuah fenomena yang terus membayangi perjalanan transisi keadilan di Indonesia. Beragam dugaan kasus pelanggaran HAM berat yang terjadi pada era Orde Baru hingga saat ini, belum dapat diselesaikan secara akuntabel dan berkeadilan sesuai standar hukum HAM internasional. Impunitas masih menjadi kendala serius bagi Indonesia dan meskipun reformasi telah melewati 24 tahun sejak tahun 1998 hingga tahun 2022, pemenuhan, pemajuan dan perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia harus terus diupayakan. Keberadaan Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000 tentang Pengadilan HAM dan Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang HAM adalah sebuah kemajuan dalam reformasi hukum dan HAM namun kedua regulasi tersebut tidak akan dapat berjalan optimal tanpa adanya dukungan dari mekanisme non yudisial seperti Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi (KKR). Tahun 2004 Indonesia pernah mengesahkan undang-undang yang mengatur tentang mekanisme ini, namun sayang telah dibatalkan melalui proses uji materi di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Berikutnya patut kita tunggu bagaimana pelanggaran HAM berat masa lalu bisa diselesaikan dengan kerangka hukum yang ada. Abstract Past human rights abuses is a phenomenon that continues to cast a shadow over the course of the transitional justice in Indonesia. Various allegation of cases of gross violation of human rgiths that occurred during the New Order era have not been resolved in an accountable and fair manner in accordance with the international human rights law standards. Impunity is still a serious obstacle for Indonesia and even though political reform has passed 24 years since 1998 to 2022, efforts must be made to ensure fulfillment, promotion and protection of human rights. The existence of Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the Human Rights Court and Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights are progress in legal and human rights reform, but these two regulations will not be able to run optimally without the support of non-judicial mechanisms such as the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. (TRC). In 2004 Indonesia passed a law on National TRC, but unfortunately it was canceled through a judicial review process at the Constitutional Court. Subsequently, we should wait to see how past human rights abuses can be resolved within the existing legal framework.
Domestic Violence Based on Law No. 23 of 2004 Concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence Chrisbiantoro Chrisbiantoro; Hudi Yusuf
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 9 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i9.1343

Abstract

Domestic Violence is a classic problem in the world of law and gender. Even though the legal umbrella to protect victims from domestic violence already exists, namely Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence, this has not been enough to anticipate this violence, in this case, the need for legal attention and protection from both the government, law enforcement officials, as well as from the community so that it is hoped that everyone who hears, sees, or knows about the occurrence of domestic violence is obliged to take preventive measures and provide assistance. Actually, what are the causes and what kind of protection is there for women victims of crimes of domestic violence regulated in Indonesian positive law? From this background, several problems can be raised, namely: against women victims of domestic violence and efforts to overcome them. Discussion of these issues requires research methods, while the research methods used include: approach methods, research specifications, types and sources of data, data collection methods, and data analysis methods. Based on the research above, the following results and conclusions can be obtained: legal protection for women victims of criminal acts of domestic violence has been regulated in Law No. 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence
Understanding Death Punishment: Historical Perspective, Justification, and Critical Analysis Utami Yustihasana Untoro; Chrisbiantoro Chrisbiantoro; Hudi Yusuf
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 11 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i11.1533

Abstract

Debatable of the death penalty based on the issues of justice, humanity, and the prevention of the possibility of crime. The reasons for the rejection of the death penalty are not justified in the view of life as well as humanitarian factors and the imposition of capital punishment will not be capable of preventing crime and reducing crime rates. But for those who agree with the imposition of capital punishment because of the sense of justice and peace that is in the community. The portrait is just a glance at the issues that colored the discourse on the pros and cons of the existence of capital punishment. The retentionist and the abolitionist against the death penalty have an argument based on his theoretical framework and norms. Indonesia as one of the countries with the European Continental legal system still applies the death penalty in the punishment system besides Saudi Arabia with qhisash which is applied in the Islamic Law system. Both countries have a legal standing built on the meta norms, their theories, and philosophies each, of course, has its urgency to be discussed in the middle of countries that condemn the existence of capital punishment. Here's an article that analyzes comparative relations to the applications of the death penalty in both countries that embrace different legal systems, this comparative study will contribute thoughts on the reforms of criminal law in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Hudi Yusuf Utami Yustihasana Untoro