p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Arena Hukum
Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo
Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Criminal Accountability Of State Officials Committing Political Corruption In Indonesia Yuliana Yuliana; Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo
Arena Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01501.8

Abstract

Political corruption is a form of violation of people's human rights and is a worrying phenomenon because it is dominated by state officials who have superior positions. This article aims to find out how the reality of law enforcement against corruption is carried out by state officials and how the criminal responsibility of state officials who commit political corruption in Indonesia. This article uses a normative juridical method. The results shows that law enforcement against state officials who commit political corruption has not been carried out optimally. The low demands of prosecutors followed by judges' verdicts against state officials who commit corruption are the cause of the difficulty of eradicating this crime. The imposition of a maximum criminal threat or life imprisonment for perpetrators of political corruption is something that should be done to create a deterrent effect for the perpetrators or the public who see it. In this case, law enforcement officers must have the courage, integrity, and high morale to be indiscriminate in eradicating political crimes in Indonesia.
Diagnosing Electoral System Performance: A Juridical Analysis of Open-List Proportional Representation in Indonesia Fifiana Wisnaeni; Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo; Madaskolay Viktoris Dahoklory; Jihyun Park
LAW REFORM Vol 22, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v22i2.74052

Abstract

Indonesia has used an open-list proportional representation system since the 2009 election to strengthen voter-representative linkage and internal party democratization. Yet persistent issues such as money politics, vote-buying, intra-party fragmentation, and low accountability of legislators question whether the system effectively converts voter choice into representative governance. This research diagnoses the performance of Indonesia’s open-list PR system through juridical analysis, focusing on its legal framework, implementation challenges, and compatibility with constitutional principles of popular sovereignty and fair representation. This research is normative juridical research using statutory, conceptual and case approach. The main sources are the Constitution 1945, Law No. 7/2017 on Elections and rulings of the Constitutional Court. Secondary Materials include academic literature and election reports 2009-2024. The results indicate that although the system legally broadens the choice of the voter, its effectiveness is compromised by the inadequate party institutionalisation, the loopholes in the regulation of campaign finance and the inconsistent jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court on election thresholds. It prioritizes individual popularity over party ideology, resulting in weak legislative cohesion. Conclusions that can be drawn are that the open-list system in Indonesia requires substantive reform through stricter campaign finance regulation, stronger internal party mechanisms, and a coherent constitutional interpretation to improve electoral accountability and systemic performance.