Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Authentica : Privat Law Journal Journal of Innovative and Creativity
Rostna Qitabi Anjilna
Universitas Pamulang
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Applicability of the Deed of Agreement for Unilateral Termination of the Build Operate Transfer (Bot) Cooperation Agreement After the Court's Decision Rostna Qitabi Anjilna
Authentica Vol 5, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Notary Master Programe, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.atc.2022.5.2.270

Abstract

The Government of Indonesia uses the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget to finance infrastructure development and regional development. To avoid high development costs, the government opens up opportunities for the private sector to invest in state assets (land) with the Build Operate Transfer system (hereinafter referred to as BOT). In the BOT model, the government permits the private sector to build and operate the project for a certain period. As an unnamed agreement, there has been no specific arrangement regarding cooperation with the BOT system. Therefore, the BOT agreement was born based on the freedom of contract as regulated in Article 1338 of the Civil Code. This agreement tends to cause legal problems such as unlawful acts. This research method is normative with secondary data sources using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. In the event of unilateral termination of the BOT agreement, it still refers to Article 1266 of the Civil Code. If one of the parties has not fulfilled all the elements contained in Article 1266, the responsibility for unilateral termination is compensation. Keywords: Unilateral Termination; Build Operate Transfer, Enforcement of Deed of Agreement
Utilization of Land Rights in Marine Areas: Conflict Over Issuance of SHM/HGB Legislation on Coastal Lands in Tangerang Regency Rostna Qitabi Anjilna
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v6i1.6377

Abstract

Kasus pagar laut di Tangerang memunculkan isu hukum agraria yang kompleks. Penerbitan hak atas tanah seperti SHM dan HGB di wilayah yang secara geografis dianggap sebagai wilayah laut tidak hanya melanggar batas-batas objek hak atas tanah dalam UU No. 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Agraria, tetapi juga menciptakan konflik norma dengan UU No. 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil serta UU No. 32 Tahun 2014 tentang Urusan Maritim. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yang menggabungkan pendekatan hukum dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerbitan SHM dan HGB di wilayah laut tidak memiliki dasar hukum, bertentangan dengan prinsip domain publik wilayah perairan, dan mengakibatkan sertifikat tersebut cacat secara hukum, dengan implikasi batal demi hukum. Lebih lanjut, praktik ini mengganggu hak masyarakat pesisir, khususnya nelayan, untuk mengakses dan memanfaatkan ruang laut. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan harmonisasi peraturan, penguatan pengawasan administratif, dan penegasan larangan penerbitan hak atas tanah di laut untuk mencegah penyalahgunaan wewenang dan melindungi kepentingan umum.
Co-Authors