Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP)
Qurrata Ayuni
Universitas Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Emergency Government of The Republic of Indonesia: Status Quo in State of Emergency Irfan Zidni; Qurrata Ayuni
Al Ahkam Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): Januari-Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37035/ajh.v18i1.6264

Abstract

There is a constitutional status quo regarding the urgency of establishing the Emergency Government of the Republic of Indonesia or Pemerintah Darurat Republik Indonesia (PDRI). The military aggression was carried out by the Dutch who had seized Yogyakarta's position as the State Capital and kidnapped President Soekarno, and Vice President Moh. Hatta and several ministers put the position and sustainability of the Indonesian state at stake. This paper discusses the urgency of the establishment of the PDRI and explores its constitutionality in a review of the state of emergency and the Triumvirate concept. Using the normative juridical historical research method, this paper discusses two findings: First, the formation of the Emergency Government of the Republic of Indonesia was motivated by the Dutch Military Aggression incident which occupied the State Capital of Yogyakarta and kidnapped the President, Vice President and several State Ministers resulting in a state crisis and a government vacuum. Second, the formation of PDRI using Law Number 6 of 1946 which contains Article 12 of the Constitution is included in the emergency legal regime. The appointment of Mr Sjafruddin Prawiranegara who at that time was the Minister of Prosperity received a direct mandate from President Soekarno to form the PDRI based on a telegram dated December 19, 1948. Although the mechanism for establishing an emergency government in the form of a triumvirate has not been regulated in the constitution, this is not a constitutional deviation as is known in the state of emergency doctrine.
Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mengadili Sengketa Hasil Pilkada dan Pemilu M Minanurrochman; Qurrata Ayuni
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3488

Abstract

Perdebatan mengadili sengketa hasil Pemilu dan Pilkada menjadi tanggung jawab Mahkamah Konstitusi, meski terdapat hal yang berlawanan dari Putusan MK No. 97/PUU-XI/2013 dengan 85/PUU-XX/2022. Fenomena paradoks ini kemudian menjadi sisi yang menarik dan unik untuk dibahas dan dikaji secara mendalam serta menimbulkan pertanyaan mengapa tidak terdapat keserasian pada putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi bahkan kewenanganNya sudah melampaui batas yang ditentukan. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian Doktrinal yang berorientasi deskripsi  analisis  terhadap hasil dari kepustakaan, hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa badan peradilan khusus Pilkada masih dibutuhkan terlebih dalam menangani persoalan sebagaimana adanya konflik pelanggaran kode etik, konflik pelaku tindak pidana dll. Keberadaan badan peradilan khusus masih perlu untuk dikonstruksikan kembali konstitusionalnya.
Co-Authors Irfan Zidni M Minanurrochman