Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Unraveling the Fintech Landscape: A Systematic Mapping Study on the Impact of Financial Technology Innovation on Investment Decision-Making in ASEAN Banking Mohammad Benny Alexandri; Irton Usman; Umi Narimawati; Agus Taryana
Khazanah Sosial Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Khazanah Sosial
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ks.v5i1.24555

Abstract

This systematic mapping study identifies and analyses fintech innovations that influence investment decision-making in ASEAN banking. Through a rigorous literature search and screening process, 128 relevant studies were analyzed, identifying four key fintech innovations that impact investment decision-making in ASEAN banking: advisory platforms, blockchain technology, peer-to-peer lending, and mobile banking. The analysis of these innovations reveals their potential to improve investment decision-making in terms of cost efficiency, speed, accessibility, and transparency. However, the study also identified several challenges associated with these innovations, including cybersecurity risks, regulatory issues, and a lack of customer trust. This study provides valuable insights into the current state of fintech innovation in ASEAN banking and its impact on investment decision-making. The findings can help policymakers, regulators, and financial institutions make informed decisions about developing and adopting fintech innovations in the region.
Collaborative Writing Models for Enhancing Academic Publication Productivity: A Systematic Literature Review Pance Daniel; Umi Narimawati; Bobi Kurniawan
Journal of General Education and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): June
Publisher : MASI Mandiri Edukasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58421/gehu.v5i3.1249

Abstract

Increasing publication pressure in academia has prompted universities and research institutions to adopt strategies to improve scholarly productivity and research competitiveness. The demand for measurable research performance, reflected through publication output, citations, and international visibility, has led institutions to explore collaborative approaches to academic writing. This study aims to analyze collaborative writing models that can improve academic publication productivity in higher education institutions. The research employed a systematic literature review (SLR) method to synthesize empirical evidence from previous studies. Data were collected from 25 empirical research articles published between 2015 and 2025 in reputable academic databases. The selected studies were analyzed using thematic synthesis to identify patterns, structures, and outcomes of collaborative writing practices in academic environments. The findings reveal four main collaborative mechanisms that significantly contribute to publication productivity: structured role allocation within writing teams, integration of digital collaboration technologies, mentoring-based writing systems, and interdisciplinary research collaboration. These mechanisms collectively enhance manuscript completion rates, improve publication quality, and increase research visibility. The results indicate that collaborative writing is not merely a shared authorship activity but a strategic organizational approach to strengthening research capacity. The study implies that academic institutions should institutionalize structured collaborative writing programs, provide digital infrastructure, and establish mentoring systems to sustainably improve publication output and global research competitiveness