Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Perigel: Jurnal Penyuluhan Masyarakat Indonesia
Markus Suryoutomo
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Sosialisasi Hukum Waris Pada Masyarakat Kelurahan Wonoplumbon, Kecamatan Mijen, Kota Semarang: Socialization of Inheritance Law to the Community of Wonoplumbon Village, Mijen Subdistrict, Semarang City Yulies Tiena Masriani; Markus Suryoutomo; Tiara Eldawati
Perigel: Jurnal Penyuluhan Masyarakat Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Maret : Perigel: Jurnal Penyuluhan Masyarakat Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/perigel.v2i1.512

Abstract

Inheritance division is a law that regulates the division of property left by someone who has died. This law is to fight for justice for everyone who is entitled to receive inheritance. The law of inheritance division plays a role in regulating how to transfer inheritance from someone who has died to the living, both regarding the inheritance, the people who are entitled to receive, the part that is entitled to be received, and how to settle the division of property. This activity is very necessary for the community, especially for community groups who do not have much access to legal information. This activity is expected to create peace of life and a harmonious family atmosphere. Sharia is the highest source of law that must be obeyed. Sharia itself was revealed for the good of Muslims and provides a solution that best suits the character and character of each human being. Sharia is the highest law that must be obeyed and accepted sincerely.
Civil Lawsuits Against Business Entities in Judicial Practice Natasya Yunita Sugiastuti; Rafiqi; Andria Marchelia; Markus Suryoutomo; Rizki Wahyudi
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol. 8 No. 1: Januari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v8i1.10114

Abstract

Unlawful acts constitute one of the fundamental bases for civil litigation within the Indonesian civil law system, particularly when the defendant is a business entity. In judicial practice, business entities as legal persons are frequently involved in commercial activities that may result in losses to other parties, including consumers, business partners, and the broader public. Consequently, claims based on unlawful acts serve as an essential legal mechanism to seek accountability for conduct that violates legal norms and causes damage. This article aims to examine the procedural framework for filing unlawful act claims against business entities in civil courts, to analyze the legal elements that must be established, and to identify evidentiary challenges commonly encountered during litigation. The research adopts a normative juridical method, employing statutory analysis, legal doctrines, and a review of relevant court decisions. The findings indicate that unlawful act claims against business entities tend to be more complex than those directed at individual defendants, particularly in proving the element of fault and establishing a causal link between the conduct and the resulting harm. Moreover, divergent judicial interpretations of the elements of unlawful acts contribute to inconsistencies in court rulings. Judicial decisions in cases involving unlawful acts committed by business entities have significant implications for legal certainty, the protection of injured parties’ rights, and the development of standards of legal responsibility in the business sector. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the construction of unlawful act claims, along with a strengthened judicial role, is essential to ensure justice and legal certainty in civil law enforcement.
Digital Contract Disputes in the FinTech Era: Legal Analysis of Consumer Protection and the Obligations of the Parties Rusdi Sanmas; Markus Suryoutomo; Arliyanda Arliyanda; Johannes Triestanto; Iwan Rasiwan
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 5 No 5 (2026): IJHESS APRIL 2026
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.2153

Abstract

The rapid development of the Financial Technology (FinTech) industry has significantly transformed the delivery of financial services, including the execution of contracts in electronic form. Digital contracts offer greater efficiency, transparency, and accessibility for the public. However, these practices also present complex legal challenges, particularly regarding consumer protection and the obligations of the parties involved. Many digital contracts still rely on standardized, one-sided clauses that may disadvantage consumers, while FinTech providers often limit their legal liability. Existing regulations, such as Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) and Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection (UUPK), provide a normative legal framework to ensure the validity of digital contracts and safeguard consumer rights. Nevertheless, implementation in practice faces obstacles, including issues with verifying electronic signatures, clarity of contractual clauses, and the effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanisms. This study employs a normative juridical approach to analyze disputes in FinTech digital contracts in Indonesia, emphasizing the need for balance between the rights and obligations of all parties. The findings suggest a necessity for regulatory harmonization, improved legal and digital literacy among consumers, and the development of adaptive dispute resolution mechanisms, including faster and more efficient online dispute resolution alternatives. These efforts are expected to enhance legal certainty, foster consumer trust, and reduce the risk of disputes in the continually evolving FinTech landscape.
Tanggung Jawab Perdata Dalam Kegagalan Sistem Pembayaran Digital: Analisis Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata: Civil Liability in Digital Payment System Failures: An Analysis of Article 1365 of the Civil Code Anindya Bidasari; Natasya Yunita Sugiastuti; Markus Suryoutomo; Purwanto; Bambang Teguh Handoyo
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 8 No. 12: Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v8i12.9669

Abstract

Perkembangan sistem pembayaran digital seperti e-wallet, mobile banking, dan platform QRIS telah meningkatkan efisiensi transaksi masyarakat. Namun, di balik kemudahan tersebut terdapat potensi kegagalan sistem seperti gangguan jaringan, error pada pemrosesan transaksi, keterlambatan settlement, hingga double transfer yang dapat menimbulkan kerugian finansial bagi konsumen maupun merchant. Situasi ini menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai dasar tanggung jawab perdata yang dapat digunakan untuk menuntut pemulihan kerugian. Artikel ini menganalisis penerapan Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata dalam konteks kegagalan sistem pembayaran digital, dengan fokus pada unsur-unsur esensial perbuatan melawan hukum, yaitu adanya perbuatan melanggar hukum, kesalahan atau kelalaian, kerugian, dan hubungan kausal. Analisis juga meninjau bagaimana prinsip tanggung jawab konvensional berdasarkan kesalahan (fault liability) berinteraksi dengan rezim teknologi yang semakin kompleks, yang dalam beberapa literatur mendorong pemberlakuan tanggung jawab objektif pada penyelenggara sistem elektronik. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif dengan mengkaji regulasi sektor pembayaran, doktrin hukum perdata, literatur ilmiah nasional, serta ketentuan penyelenggaraan sistem elektronik. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan Pasal 1365 tetap relevan, tetapi harus diperkuat dengan standar teknis yang diatur dalam regulasi sektoral sebagai parameter untuk menilai ada tidaknya kelalaian. Selain itu, diperlukan mekanisme pemulihan yang lebih responsif dan transparan guna memastikan perlindungan hukum yang optimal bagi konsumen.
Co-Authors Andria Marchelia Anindya Bidasari Arliyanda Arliyanda Bambang Teguh Handoyo Iwan Rasiwan Johannes Triestanto Natasya Yunita Sugiastuti Nora Idiawati Purwanto Rafiqi Rizki Wahyudi Rusdi Sanmas Tiara Eldawati