Rachel Meiliawati Yoshari
Program Studi Teknologi Pangan, Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengaruh perbedaan konsentrasi maltodekstrin dan Na-CMC terhadap sifat fisikokimia bubuk buah semangka merah Ignasius Radix A.P. Jati; Birgitta Artadila Kusuma; Erni Setijawaty; Rachel Meiliawati Yoshari

Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Universitas Yudharta, Pasuruan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35891/tp.v14i1.3305

Abstract

???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????? ????????????????????. ???????? ???????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????? ????????????????????????????????????????, ???????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????-???????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????. ???????? ???????????????? ????????????????????????????????, ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????-???????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????? ???? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????? ???? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? 60-65°???? ???????????? 6 ????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? 6%, 12% ???????????? 18%, ???????????????????? ???????????? ????????-???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? 2.5%, 5% ???????????? 7.5%. ???????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ????????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????, ???????????????????? ????????????????????????, ???????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????? ???????????? ????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? 1.68-3.65%; ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? 9.27-11.56%; ???????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? 437.9543-887.9543 ???????? ????????????/????, ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? 34.15-75.79% , ???????????????????? ???????? ????=49,.0-61,; ????=25.4-28.2; ????=33.6°-35.7° ???????????? ???????? ???????????????????? ???????? 6.14-6.34. ????????????????????????????????????, ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ????????-???????????? ???????????? ???? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? 2.85-3.67%; ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? 16.87-23.65%; ???????????????????? ???????????????????????? 224.3183-673.1820 ???????? ????????????/????, ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? 23.51-72.71% ????????????, ???????????????????? ???????????????? ????=42.8-46.0;????=27.8-30.1; ????=26.4°-28.7°, ???????????? ???????? 7.10-7.51.????????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????-???????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????.
PENGEMBANGAN SMART EDIBLE PACKAGING BERBAHAN ALGINAT DENGAN PENAMBAHAN EKSTRAK BUNGA TELANG DAN TEPUNG CANGKANG TELUR AYAM Michellyn Alvina; Rachel Meiliawati Yoshari; Jati, Ignasius Radix A.P.
Jurnal Pengolahan Pangan Vol 9 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Alkhairaat Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31970/pangan.v9i2.174

Abstract

Smart edible packaging is a type of packaging that includes smart agents and can be made using alginate, chicken eggshell flour and butterfly pea flower extract. The smart agents added to the packaging help to increase its sturdiness, elasticity, and ability to detect and respond to changes in the quality of the packaged products. The purpose of the study was to investigate the physicochemical properties and capabilities of smart edible packaging as a food packer. The data collected was analyzed using ANOVA (α = 5%) and continued with the DMRT test (α = 5%). The results showed that there is an interaction between the concentration of chicken eggshell flour and the ratio of butterfly pea flower extract, which has a significant effect on tensile strength factors (2.9227-12.1723N/mm2), % elongation (18.02-40.7733%), and WVTR (96.9625-203.9756g/m2/24 hours) in smart edible packaging. However, the total anthocyanin factor (0.1364-3.0757mg cy-3-glu eq/100g ingredient), total phenol (158.8844-998.0301mg GAE/100g ingredient), and antioxidant activity (4.1734-90.6775%) were only influenced by the concentration of butterfly pea flower extract. The study found that the use of smart edible packaging, specifically treatment T3, can help maintain the quality of chicken meat during storage.