Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERANAN LEMBAGA SOSIALTERHADAP PEMBINAAN MORAL REMAJA DI KENAGARAIAN BATU GADANGKABUPATEN PADANG PARIAMAN Silvia Anggreni BP; Befrido Ilham; Andika Dirsa
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 5, No 3 (2023): Volume 5 No. 3 Edisi 1 April 2023
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (169.293 KB) | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v5i3.1608

Abstract

This research was backgrounded by the discovery of the role of Social Institutions in the form of Family Institutions, Educational Institutions, Religious Institutions and Legal Institutions in fostering adolescent morale in Kanagarian Batu Gadang, Padang Pariaman Regency. The purpose of this study is to find out how moral coaching is carried out by Social Institutions and to find out what obstacles are experienced by Social Institutions in fostering adolescent morale in Kanagarian Batu Gadang.            This type of research is qualitative research with the research method is descriptive, which is taken using purposive sampling techniques. Data were collected by observation techniques, interviews and documentation. The data validity test is to use trigulation techniques. This research data analysis technique was carried out using techniques from Milles and Huberman, namely: (1) the data collection process, (2) data reduction, (3) data presentation and (4) withdrawal of accuracy or verification. The informants in this study were each social institution in Nagari Batu Gadang, namely Parents, Teachers, Alim Ulama and the Police.            Based on the results of data analysis and discussion, it is concluded that the role of Social Institutions in fostering adolescent morale is: conveying to adolescents through proselytizing and Islamic religious guidance and providing counseling on the effects of deviant behavior. The obstacles faced by Social Institutions in guiding the morals of adolescents are: (a) Family institutions: the influence of an unfavorable environment and the lack of communication established in the family, (b) Educational institutions: teachers are faced with students who are difficult to advise and do not want to listen to advice, (c) Agam institutions: adolescents find it difficult to listen to advice so that scholars choose to be silent in advising them, (d) Legal institutions: communities that do not contribute to reporting perpetrators of deviance. As well as efforts to overcome the obstacles faced by Social Institutions are: (a) Holding religious recitations or lectures, (b)Paying attention to the environment of youth association, and (c) Supervising and providing threats in the form of reporting if they commit deviant behavior.Keywords: Social Institutions, Moral Construction, and Teenagers.
The Influence of Social Studies Learning Using the Questions Students Have and Drill and Practice Learning Methods on Student Learning Outcomes Happri Novriza Setya Dhewantoro; Annisa Nurul Firdausi; Andika Dirsa
Heritage Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Heritage: Journal of Social Studies
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/hrtg.v5i2.157

Abstract

This research seeks to find out if there is a meaningful difference in learning results between students who utilize the Question Student Have method and those who utilize the Drill and Practice method at SMP Negeri 1 Jatisrono. This research is an experimental study employing a randomized pretest-posttest comparison group design. The study's population included grade VIII students from SMP Negeri 1 Jatisrono, with samples taken from two classes, specifically class VIII B and VIII C, chosen through purposive sampling methods. Data gathering was conducted via observation, documentation, pretest, and posttest. Data analysis consisted of prerequisite tests for normality and homogeneity, followed by hypothesis testing using an independent samples t-test. The findings revealed a notable difference in learning outcomes between students using the Question Student Have method and those using the Drill and Practice method. This is shown by the average pretest score of experimental class 1 being 72.51 and experimental class 2 being 68.83. In contrast, posttest data analysis showed the average score of experimental class 1 to be 79.75 and experimental class 2 to be 75.85. Hypothesis testing using the t-test at a significance level of 0.05 yielded a calculated t value > t table (2.93 > 1.99), leading to the acceptance of Ha and rejection of H0. Therefore, it can be concluded that the learning results of students using the Question Student Have method are superior to those of students using the Drill and Practice method.