Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI
Hengki Syahyunan
Program Magister Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Labuhanbatu
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 39 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PERKEBUNAN TERHADAP PELAKU PENCURIAN KELAPA SAWIT Hengki Syahyunan; Khairuddin Hasibuan; Hilaman Arfandy Siregar; Edy Pane; Lelisari Lelisari
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v10i2.4179

Abstract

There are different points of view that cause unrest in the community related to the certainty of law enforcement of palm oil theft in Indonesia. The weak law enforcement against palm oil theft is due to the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 concerning the Adjustment of the Limits for Minor Crimes which translates the value of currency in article 364 of the Criminal Code and others which was originally IDR 250 read into IDR 2,500,000. Laws, Theft, Plantations. This has become a polemic in the community because it has implications for the many acts of palm oil theft whose loss value is not more than the provisions mentioned above so that it does not entangle the perpetrators and does not provide a deterrent effect to the perpetrators of palm oil theft. On the other hand, this Supreme Court Regulation can be overridden by Law Number 39 of 2014 concerning Plantations which can ensnare perpetrators of oil palm theft if the perpetrators harm the Legal Entity Plantation. It is reviewed in several decisions of the Rantauprapat District Court, that there is a verdict against the perpetrators of palm oil theft whose loss value is not more than Rp 2,500,000, but the verdict is sentenced to 6 months in prison. This consideration refers to article 107 letter d of Law Number 39 of 2014 concerning Plantations.Keywords: Law Application, Theft, Plantation
DISPARITY OF JUDGES' DECISIONS REGARDING CRIMINAL OFFENSES THEFT OF PLANTATION PRODUCTS Syahyunan, Hengki; Zelibu, Yanto; Siregar, Putri Habibah
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 12, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v12i3.6199

Abstract

The disparity in the application of the law against perpetrators of theft of plantation products is a law enforcement problem that must be resolved in order to create a sense of justice, certainty and legal benefits. The purpose of this research is to be a reference for law enforcers in applying fair, certain and useful rules. This research is an analytical descriptive research with a type of qualitative research that examines and analyzes references to journals, books, laws and regulations, and considerations of judges' decisions. The clear conclusion is that there is a disparity in the perspective of judges in imposing legal decisions on perpetrators of theft of plantation products. The disparity in judges' decisions in plantation theft cases reflects various challenges in the justice system. Factors such as variations in evidence, differences in legal interpretation, local social influences, and the quality of law enforcement play an important role in creating uncertainty. To achieve better justice and consistency in decisions, reforms in the justice system are needed, including improving the quality of law enforcement, especially judges. Thus, it is hoped that justice for victims can be achieved, and the justice system can be more trusted by the community.Keywords: Disparity; Plantation Products; Theft;
Co-Authors Edy Pane Hilaman Arfandy Siregar Khairuddin Hasibuan Lelisari, Lelisari Siregar, Putri Habibah Zelibu, Yanto