Harries Madiistriyatno
STIMA IMMI, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Effect of Work Ethics and Work Environment on Employee Performance At The Jakarta Primary Tax Service Gambir Tiga Munir Azhari; Harries Madiistriyatno; Sukar Naibaho
Return : Study of Management, Economic and Bussines Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Return : Study of Management, Economic And Bussines
Publisher : PT. Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/return.v2i03.85

Abstract

This research is quantitative, descriptive, and associative type. The population in this study was 70 employees at the Gambir Tiga Jakarta Primary Tax Service Office. The sampling technique in this study is total sampling. With the total sampling technique, a sample of 70 employees was taken at the Gambir Tiga Jakarta Primary Tax Service Office as respondents in this study. The results of this study indicate that: 1) There is an influence of work ethic on employee performance, as evidenced by the count for the X1 variable (Work Ethic) of 13,491, while the value of the t table for n = 70 is 1,994. So t arithmetic> table or  13,491> 1,994, it can be concluded that the  Work  Ethic variable influences partially the Job Performance of Employees. The coefficient regression value of the. The work ethic variable (X1) to the Employee Job Performance variable (Y) is 0.405. This means that if the Work Ethics variable (X1) rises by 1 unit it will increase the. Employee Job Performance (Y) variable by 0.405, assuming the Work Ethics variable (X1) is considered constant. 2) There is an influence of the work environment on employee work performance, as evidenced by the count for the X2 variable (Work Environment) of 16,862, while the value of the table for n = 70 is 1,994. So tcount>table or 16,862>1,994, it can be concluded that partial  Work  Environment variables affect Employee Work Performance. The value of the regression coefficient of the Work Environment variable (X2) to the Employee Job Performance variable (Y) is 0.605. This means that if the Work Environment variable (X2) increases by 1 unit, it will increase the Employee Job Performance (Y) variable by 0.605, assuming the Work Environment variable (X2) is considered constant. 3) There is an influence of work ethic and work environment together on employee work performance, as evidenced by the ANOVA or Ftest or Fcount test in the value of 302,319 which is greater than Ftable of 2.74 with a significant level of 0,000 because 0,000 <0.05, so it can be said that the Work Ethics variable (X1) and Work Environment variable (X2) together influence the Employee Performance variable (Y). While the Adjusted R. Square value of 0.900. This shows that 90% of the work ethic and work environment simultaneously (jointly) affect employee work performance, while the remaining 10% is influenced by other factors not examined in this study.
The Influence of Leadership on Employee Performance In Class IIA Central Institution, Karawang Bambang Nurakhim; Harries Madiistriyatno; Aji Wijayanto
Return : Study of Management, Economic and Bussines Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Return : Study of Management, Economic And Bussines
Publisher : PT. Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/return.v2i04.93

Abstract

In this study, there are two variables, namely Variable X (Leadership) and Variable Y (Performance). This research was conducted to determine the Leadership at the Class IIA Karawang Penitentiary, Employee Performance at the Class IIA Penitentiary Karawang. The method used in this research is descriptive analysis method to discuss the problem formulation of how Leadership in Correctional Class IIA Karawang and employee performance at Correctional Class IIA Karawang, and verification analysis to discuss the formulation of the problem of how much influence Leadership has on Employee Performance in Class Penitentiary. IIA Karawang. The data used are primary and secondary data collected through observation, interviews, questionnaires (questionnaires), and literature. The hypothesis of this research is that there is an influence of leadership on employee performance in Correctional Institution class IIA Karawang. To measure the magnitude of the effect of these variables, Simple Linear Regression and Correlation Coefficients and Coefficients of Determination were used with the help of the IBM SPSS application program. Based on the results of data analysis using statistical methods, namely Simple Linear Regression, the Coefficient of Determination (KD) value is 0.45. Based on these results, it can be concluded that Leadership has an effect on Employee Performance at the Class IIA Karawang Penitentiary.