Syahranuddin Syahranuddin
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Reconstruction of Food Provision for Correctional Inmates in Fulfilling Human Rights Hendra Sembiring; Syahranuddin Syahranuddin; Lidya Rahmadhani Hasibuan
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i4.771

Abstract

The provision of food for inmates is part of the fulfillment of fundamental human rights as regulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 40 of 2017. However, in its implementation, various problems are still found that require in-depth study to reconstruct the existing system to be more effective in realizing the fulfillment of human rights. This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 40 of 2017 in fulfilling human rights in correctional institutions and to formulate an ideal legal reconstruction of the provision of food for inmates to realize the fulfillment of human rights in the future. This study uses a normative legal research method with primary legal materials (legislation related to the provision of food in prisons), secondary (books, journals), and tertiary (legal dictionaries). The analysis was carried out qualitatively to examine the implementation of the policy and formulate an ideal legal reconstruction. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of Permenkumham No. 40/2017 still faces various obstacles including budget constraints, inadequate infrastructure, limited competent human resources, and a less than optimal supervision system. The ideal legal reconstruction includes strengthening the legal basis, developing a sustainable funding system, improving HR competency standards, developing an integrated monitoring system, and utilizing information technology in food management to realize the fulfillment of human rights for correctional inmates.
Legal Review of Legal Protection for Motorcycle Owners in Cases of Embezzlement and the Responsibility of Related Parties Alfathin Zakiy; Syahranuddin Syahranuddin; Rahul Ardian Fikri
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v2i3.766

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal review of legal protection for motorcycle owners in cases of embezzlement. To anticipate the development of society in relation to changes in crime, efforts can be made to plan the creation of criminal law that accommodates all the dynamics of society. This is a policy issue, namely regarding the selection of means in regulating social life. The crime of theft is regulated in the Criminal Code book II chapter XXII Articles 362 to Article 367. Indonesia is a country that is included in the category of developing countries and of course cannot be separated from the problems that have been raised above. Crimes that occur in developing countries are still relatively high. Therefore, it is not surprising that the problem of crime or criminality in Indonesia is a result of the life of its people. Crime can be interpreted criminologically and juridically. One example of a crime is the crime of embezzlement which is regulated in Articles 372 to 377 of the Criminal Code.  The normative juridical research method with a descriptive approach, this study reveals that legal protection for motorcycle owners in embezzlement cases is based on Article 372 of the Criminal Code and Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law. The concept of imposing criminal penalties on embezzlement crimes in Indonesia. Article 372 of the Criminal Code and Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law. Thus, the judge sentenced the defendant to 3 (three) years in prison.