Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Rendi Fajar Gumilang
Fakultas Teknik, Institut Teknologi Padang
Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisa Perbandingan Pengendali PID pada Motor DC Menggunakan Metode Ziegler-Nichols dan Trial and Error Refigol Afrawira; Rendi Fajar Gumilang; Sitti Amalia; Sepanur Bandri
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development (Mei 202
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (540.223 KB) | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v5i3.758

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to design a PID control on a DC motor using 2 tuning methods, namely Trial & Error and Ziegler-Nichols. The results showed that the Pittman DC Motor system response from the Pittman DC motor was very unstable, in which there were still many oscillations and a very high overshoot value. In the Trial & Error method, the system response value was obtained on the P controller, namely, rise time = 0.000551 s, settling time = 0.00468 s, overshoot = 37.1 %, peak time = 0.972 s, and time delay = 0.00134 s. on the PI controller namely, rise time = 0.000396 s, settling time = 0.00534 s, overshoot = 47.7%, peak time = 1.23 s, and time delay = 0.00102 s. on the PID controller namely, rise time = 0.000223 s, settling time = 0.00502 s, overshoot = 64.6%, peak time = 1.54 s, and time delay = 0.000601 s. In the Ziegler-NIchols method, the response value of the system to the P controller is obtained, namely, rise time = 0.00118 s, settling time = 0.00564 s, overshoot = 15.4%, peak time = 0.178 s, and time delay = 0.00262 s. on the PI controller namely, rise time = 0.000275 s, settling time = 0.00531 s, overshoot = 58.3%, peak time = 1.44 s, and time delay = 0.000767 s. on the PID controller, namely, rise time = 0.00133 s, settling time = 0.00446 s, overshoot = 12.6 %, peak time = 0.0237 s, and time delay = 0.00288 s. The simulation results show that the value for the Ziegler-Nichols tuning method is better than the Trial & Error method, perhaps because the input value for the Trial & Error method is larger.
Analisa Perbandingan Kontroler PID Terhadap Motor BLDC Menggunakan Penalaran Cohen-Coon dan Trial & Error Rendi Fajar Gumilang; Sitti Amalia; Anggun Anugrah; Sepanur Bandri
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development (Mei 202
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (758.048 KB) | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v5i3.759

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to design PID control on BLDC motors using 2 tuning methods, namely Cohen-Coon and Trial & Error. PID control of formula calculations with calculations in Simulink Matlab. From the simulation results shown in graphical form, the use of the PID control gives a better effect than the use of the P and PI controls. This can be seen in the comparison curve which shows the speed of the initial start process when using the PID control. In the Trial & Error method, the response value of the system to controller P is obtained, namely, rise time = 0.0151 s, settling time = 0.6 s, overshoot = 75.9%, peak time = 1.74 s, and time delay = 0.424 s. on the PI controller namely, rise time = 0.0148 s, settling time = 0.591 s, overshoot = 76.3%, peak time = 1.74 s, and time delay = 0.0416 s. on the PID controller namely, rise time = 0.0496 s, settling time = 0.55 s, overshoot = 44 %, peak time = 1.31 s, and time delay = 0.128 s. In the Cohen-Coon method, the response value of the system to controller P is obtained, namely, rise time = 0.0168 s, settling time = 0.575 s, overshoot = 73.3%, peak time = 1.71 s, and time delay = 0.0469 s. on the PI controller namely, rise time = 0.0573 s, settling time = 0.603 s, overshoot = 39.3%, peak time = 1.23 s, and time delay = 0.142 s. on the PID controller namely, rise time = 0.276 s, settling time = 0.658 s, overshoot = 2.42 %, peak time = 0.159 s, and time delay = 0.576 s. From the simulation results it is shown that the value for the Cohen-Coon tuning method is better than the Trial & Error method, perhaps because the input value for the Trial & Error method is larger.
Co-Authors Anggun Anugrah Refigol Afrawira Sepanur Bandri