Satrio Sakti Nugroho, Satrio Sakti
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI CUSTOMER DUE DILLIGENCE DAN ENHANCED DUE DILLIGENCE DALAM MENCEGAH TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG Nugroho, Satrio Sakti
Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang Vol 3 No 1 (2014): Unnes L.J. (April, 2014)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (281.981 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v3i1.3633

Abstract

Pemerintah dan Bank Indonesia membuat peraturan terkait dengan program Anti Pencucian Uang yang memuat prinsip mengenali pengguna jasa/Customer Due Dilligence yang kemudian diperluas oleh Bank Indonesia dengan prinsip mengenali pengguna jasa lebih mendalam/Enhanced Due Dilligence. Pelaksanaan Customer Due Dilligence dan Enhanced Due Dilligence serta pengawasan dari perbankan dan Bank Indonesia perlu untuk diketahui sebagai upaya pencegahan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah dengan pendekatan kualitatif, jenis penelitian yuridis sosiologis, pengambilan data dilakukan dengan teknik wawancara dan dokumentasi. Analisis data dilakukan dengan deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa implementasi Customer Due Dilligence dilakukan pada saat calon nasabah membuka rekening, adanya transaksi mencurigakan, transaksi tunai lebih dari atau sama dengan Rp 500.000.000,00, dan pihak bank meragukan kebenaran informasi pengguna jasa. Enhanced Due Dilligence dilakukan pada calon nasabah Politically Exposed Person saat membuka rekening. Pengawasan internal bank saat pengguna jasa melakukan hubungan usaha, dual checking dan register tersendiri bagi Politically Exposed Person, pelaporan transaksi mencurigakan dan transaksi tunai, pembagian kewenangan pegawai, adanya pelatihan bagi pegawai terkait tindak pidana pencucian uang, dan terdapat pengkinian data nasabah. Pengawasan Bank Indonesia dengan membuat aturan terkait Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dan mengawasi pelaksanaannya. Simpulan dari penelitian adalah Customer Due Dilligence diimplementasikan pada saat melakukan hubungan usaha dengan pengguna jasa. Customer Due Dilligence tidak diimplementasikan pada saat transaksi dengan Walk In Customer dengan nominal lebih dari atau sama dengan Rp 100.000.000,00. Enhanced Due Dilligence diimplementasikan pada saat melakukan hubungan usaha dengan Politically Exposed Person, namun tidak dilakukan Enhanced Due Dilligence untuk keluarga Politically Exposed Person. Pengawasan bank dilakukan pada saat melakukan hubungan usaha dengan mapping wilayah, pembagian kewenangan pada pegawai, pelaporan transaksi mencurigakan dan transaksi tunai. Namun tidak dilakukan pengawasan bagi non nasabah. Pengawasan Bank Indonesia terkait dengan Program Anti Pencucian Uang yaitu membuat aturan terkait Customer Due Dilligence dan Enhanced Due Dilligence dan mengawasi pelaksanaanya.Indonesian government and Bank Indonesia made a regulation of anti money laundry in order to prevent any money laundry done by person using banking facilities. Those regulation accomodate a principle of knowing the customer/Customer Due Dilligece broaden by Bank Indonesia by further knowing the customer/Enhanced Due Dilligence. Implementation of Customer Due Dilligence, Enhanced Due Dilligence, and the supervision of both by the banking and Bank Indonesia are important to be understood as a prevention of money laundry. The aim of this study is describing the implementation of Customer Due Dilligence, Enhanced Due Dilligence, and the internal supervision done by branch office of BRI Semarang Pandanaran and Bank Indonesia supervision of anti money laundry program. Research method used by researcher was qualitative approach on sociological jurisprudence, data compilation was done by interview and documentations review, and the data analized by a qualitative dercriptive analizing. This study shows that Customer Due Dilligence was done when customer decided to open a bank account, a suspicious transaction, more than Rp 500.000.000,00 cash transaction, and an enquiry of customer valid information. Enhanced Due Dilligence was done when Politically exposed prospective customer open a bank account. Internal supervision was done on enterprise relation, Politically Exposed Person registration and dual checking, suspicious transaction report, authority apportionment, and update on customer data. Bank Indonesia supervision was done by establishing regulation related to anti money laundering and supervise the implementation. Conclusion of this research is Customer Due Dilligence implemented on enterprise relation with customer. Customer Due Dilligence was not implemented for Walk In Customer by transaction more than Rp 100.000.000,00. Enhanced Due Dilligence implemented in enterprise relation with Politically Exposed Person, but not implemented on Politically Exposed Person’s family. Bank supervision implemented on enterprise relation by area mapping, authority apportionment, and suspicious transaction report, but there was no implementation on Walk in Customer. Bank Indonesia supervision was done by establishing regulation related to anti money laundering and supervise the implementation.
Who Will Advocate? The Impact of Decision 93/PUU-XX/2022 on Article 433 Civil Code Amendments for Disability Rights and Legal Protection Nugroho, Harry; Utari, Indah Sri; Irawaty, Irawaty; Nugroho, Satrio Sakti; Ezzerouali, Souad; Sanni, Tajudeen
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): The Global Challenges on Advocacy and Law Enforcement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v7i1.22699

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia’s Decision Number 93/PUU-XX/2022 marks a pivotal moment in disability rights by ruling that the terms “imbecile,” “mentally ill,” and “dark-eyed,” along with the word “must” in Article 433 of the Civil Code, are inconsistent with the 1945 Constitution. The Court replaced these derogatory terms with “persons with mental and/or intellectual disabilities” and revised “must” to “can,” signaling a shift toward a more rights-based approach. However, this legal amendment raises critical questions: Does it effectively balance guardianship proceedings with the rights and autonomy of persons with disabilities? And who will advocate for their protection and inclusion in the legal system? This study analyzes the decision’s implications, particularly its impact on the legal mechanisms available to individuals with mental and intellectual disabilities. Using a qualitative approach and a statutory analysis of the Civil Code, Law No. 8 of 2016 on Disability, Law No. 19 of 2011 on the Protection and Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and the Constitutional Court ruling, this research evaluates the extent to which the amendments align with international human rights standards, such as the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). By placing Indonesia’s legal reforms in the broader international debate on disability rights, this study highlights the urgency of stronger advocacy and legal safeguards to prevent continued marginalization. The findings contribute to discussions on legal capacity, guardianship, and human dignity, offering insights for policymakers, legal practitioners, and human rights advocates seeking to advance disability rights worldwide.
Standard Agreements: Review of the Principles Pacta Sunt Servanda, Good Faith and  Fairness Priyono, Ery Agus; Saputra, Dimas Almeida; Nugroho, Satrio Sakti; Asih, Dharu Tri Asih
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): November, 2025: Law, Policy, and Governance in Contemporary Socio-Economic Tran
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i2.25800

Abstract

The use of standardized contracts today shows one side of the dominance of the modern economy by business entities or companies and even banks. Agreement is one of the main sources in civil law relationships, where the parties involved have the freedom to determine the contents and form of the agreement in accordance with Article 1338 of the Civil Code. In practice, this freedom often does not take place in a balanced manner, especially in standardized agreements. This research focuses on the principle of justice in standard agreements, where the agreement should be able to fulfill a sense of justice for the parties.    Justice is very important in standard agreements, to avoid exploitative practices and ensure equal legal protection between the parties. Based on this narrative, it is important to examine how the principle of justice is applied, protected, and enforced in standard agreements that develop in the community. The approach used in this study is normative juridical, focusing on secondary data. The results of the study show that the application of the fairness aspect of contracting in agreements or standardized contracts is still far from expectations. Agreements made in standardized forms tend to benefit one party who has a stronger bargaining position, who usually acts as the "designer" of the standardized contract.