Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Juridical Review of the Authority of the Central Jakarta District Court in Deciding Election Postponement Cases (Central Jakarta District Court Decision Study Decision Number 757/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt. Pst) Lavienda William; Tanissa Mayra Tsabitha; Sitti Nabila Yusri
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 2, No 1 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i1.474

Abstract

Indonesia is a unitary state in the form of a republic that adheres to an indirect democratic system of government, in which the people's voice is represented by the people's representative body so that the state always carries out a general election system every 5 years. General elections are a means of people's sovereignty to elect members of the DPR, DPD, DPRD, President and Vice President, which are carried out directly, publicly, freely, confidentially, honestly and fairly, within the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. issues circulating in Indonesia regarding elections because Indonesia will again carry out elections in 2024. One of the issues that has shocked the public lately is the issue of postponing the elections that came from the Central Jakarta District Court. The research method used in writing this scientific article is normative juridical research. As for the research approach used in this study is qualitative research. From the results of the research, the authors conclude that the election dispute between the Prima Party and the KPU does not fulfill the conditions for postponement of the election, and that the Central Jakarta District Court is not authorized to adjudicate cases of postponed elections. Court institutions in the future are expected to carry out their duties and authorities in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual atas Karya AI: Studi Kasus ChatGPT dan DeepSeek dalam Perspektif TRIPS Agreement Tanissa Mayra Tsabitha
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v8i1.2472

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (AI), khususnya generative AI seperti ChatGPT dan DeepSeek, telah memunculkan suatu tantangan yang baru di sistem perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI). Artikel ini mengkaji status hukum karya yang sepenuhnya dihasilkan oleh AI di perspektif perjanjian internasional TRIPS dan sistem hukum nasional. Lewat metode yuridis normatif dan pendekatan komparatif, penelitian ini menyoroti ketidaksesuaian antara perkembangan teknologi dan regulasi yang ada. Perjanjian TRIPS belum secara eksplisit mengatur mengenai status hukum karya yang dihasilkan tanpa kontribusi manusia, sehingga menimbulkan kekosongan hukum dan perbedaan interpretasi antarnegara. Di Indonesia, Undang-Undang Hak Cipta masih mendefinisikan pencipta sebagai manusia, sehingga karya AI-only belum dapat memperoleh perlindungan hukum. Studi kasus ChatGPT dan DeepSeek menunjukkan kompleksitas dalam atribusi kepemilikan dan potensi pelanggaran HKI, seperti praktik knowledge distillation. Artikel ini merekomendasikan amandemen TRIPS untuk memasukkan definisi "karya AI", penguatan regulasi nasional, serta eksplorasi rezim hukum sui generis sebagai solusi alternatif. Dengan demikian, perlindungan HKI dapat disesuaikan dengan realitas teknologi masa kini dan mendukung terciptanya ekosistem inovasi yang adil, seimbang, dan berkelanjutan.