Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Guarantee of Confidentiality of Customer Data in Online Loan Business Services Ahmad Sahroni; Faisal Santiago; Ahmad Redi
Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): INJURITY: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies.
Publisher : Pusat Publikasi Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1033.545 KB) | DOI: 10.58631/injurity.v2i2.30

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fintech emerged along with changes in people's lifestyles which are currently dominated by users of information technology and the demands of a fast-paced life. Personal data and consumer behavior are part of big data whose economic value can be high, and vulnerable to The Ministry of Communication and Information (Kominfo), OJK, and the police in supervising online loan services. Customer data protection is regulated in Ministerial Regulation (Permen) Number 20 of 2016 concerning Personal Data Protection.
Resolution of Disputes Over The Regional Head Elections Post The Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUUXX/2022 Regarding The Implementation of Simultaneous Regional Elections in Indonesia Ridwan Syaidi; Zainal Arifin Hoesein; Ahmad Redi
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Journal Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v4i3.1132

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013 which in its consideration states that the Constitutional Court cannot add authority that is not contained in the 1945 Constitution, so that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022 remains conditional Constitutional authority considering The Lawmakers also did not draft a special law as intended in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-XI/2013. The problems are (1) What are the implications of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 97/PUU-IX/2013 after the enactment of Law no. 10 of 2016 concerning the Election of Regional Heads on the Implementation of Regional Elections in Indonesia?; (2) What is the impact of resolving regional election disputes after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 85/PUU-XX/2022?; (3) What is the ideal institutional model for resolving setbacks in regional head election results? To answer this problem, a comprehensive study is needed, namely examining the 1945 Constitution, Law N0.10 of 2016, Constitutional Court Decision Number 7273/PUU-II/2004, Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUU-XI/ 2013, Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022. Research Results: (1) The authority to examine and decide on the voting results of regional head elections is carried out as long as there is no special court, in order to provide legal certainty in resolving disputes over the results of simultaneous regional heads in 2024. (2) Look at the stages of regional head elections that have been advanced and have not yet been brought forward. (3) Model The ideal institution for resolving disputes over regional head election results must be a special ad hoc judicial body.