Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal English Education Journal MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan International Journal of Language and Ubiquitous Learning
M. Ubaidillah Karomi Safari, M. Ubaidillah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : English Education Journal

 1 
LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY LEARNERS WITH DIFFERENT SPEAKING PERFORMANCE FOR DEVELOPING SPEAKING ABILITY Karomi Safari, M. Ubaidillah; Fitriati, Sri Wuli
English Education Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2016)
Publisher : English Education Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study describes learning strategies used by English language learners with different speaking performance. The aims of this study were (1) describing learning strategies used by learners with high and low speaking performance in improving their speaking abilities, (2) describingthe difference of learning strategies used by learners with high and low speaking performance, (3) Describing factors are influencing the use of learning strategies by learners, (4) Describing problems encountered by learners with low speaking.This study was a qualitative case study on 20 learners of speaking classes. Those learners were taken from two classes at two English courses. The data were collected by using classroom observations, questionnaires, interviews, and the data of learners’ achievement given by teachers. Those were analyzed in descriptive qualitative method.The finding reveals five results: (1) Learners wih high speaking performance used all kinds of strategies in learning speaking. They employed those stretegies in the aqual degree of frequency. (2) Learners with low speaking performance usually used cognitive, metacogntitive and social strategies. They also did not apply those strategies in aqual degree of frequency. (3) Learners with high speaking performance used strategies more dominantly and actively than those with low speaking performers. (4) Learners with high speaking performance seemed to have higher motivation than low speaking performance. This case influences the application of those strategies. (5) Problems encountered by learners with low speaking performance were in the application of strategies. The lowest percentages of variance were explained by memory, compensatory, and affective strategies.
LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY LEARNERS WITH DIFFERENT SPEAKING PERFORMANCE FOR DEVELOPING SPEAKING ABILITY Karomi Safari, M. Ubaidillah; Fitriati, Sri Wuli
English Education Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study describes learning strategies used by English language learners with different speaking performance. The aims of this study were (1) describing learning strategies used by learners with high and low speaking performance in improving their speaking abilities, (2) describingthe difference of learning strategies used by learners with high and low speaking performance, (3) Describing factors are influencing the use of learning strategies by learners, (4) Describing problems encountered by learners with low speaking.This study was a qualitative case study on 20 learners of speaking classes. Those learners were taken from two classes at two English courses. The data were collected by using classroom observations, questionnaires, interviews, and the data of learners’ achievement given by teachers. Those were analyzed in descriptive qualitative method.The finding reveals five results: (1) Learners wih high speaking performance used all kinds of strategies in learning speaking. They employed those stretegies in the aqual degree of frequency. (2) Learners with low speaking performance usually used cognitive, metacogntitive and social strategies. They also did not apply those strategies in aqual degree of frequency. (3) Learners with high speaking performance used strategies more dominantly and actively than those with low speaking performers. (4) Learners with high speaking performance seemed to have higher motivation than low speaking performance. This case influences the application of those strategies. (5) Problems encountered by learners with low speaking performance were in the application of strategies. The lowest percentages of variance were explained by memory, compensatory, and affective strategies.
Co-Authors Chai, Nong Haris Danial Karimah, Saidatul Mafruhah, Anisatul Sri Wuli Fitriati