Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PRO KONTRA PENCABUTAN HAK MENDUDUKI JABATAN PUBLIK BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Dewa Rumphas; Nasrullah; Nurlisna; Evi Oktarina
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): November
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (670.714 KB)

Abstract

Abstrak Tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia telah masuk dalam kategori membahayakan. Persoalan bangsa yang bersifat darurat yang dihadapi Negara Indonesia dari masa ke masa dengan rentang waktu yang relatif lama belum dapat terselesaikan dengan baik, tetap saja para pelaku tindak pidana korupsi hadir di negeri ini sebagai penjajah yang menjadi musuh seluruh elemen masyarakat. Sehubungan dengan korupsi tersebut melahirkan sejumlah pelaku utama korupsi salah satunya Pejabat Publik. Pejabat mempunyai peran yang strategis untuk melakukan korupsi lewat wewenang yang melekat pada jabatan itu. Perbuatan mereka dapat mengakibatkan kebangkrutan nasional. metode penelitian yuridis normatif . Dasar hukum penjatuhan pidana tambahan berupa Pencabutan Hak Menduduki Jabatan Publik Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Di Indonesia dikarenakan Pencabutan hak-hak tertentu hanya untuk tindak pidana yang tegas ditentukan oleh undang-undang bahwa tindak pidana tersebut diancam oleh pidana tambahan . Kata Kunci : Pencabutan , Hak , Korupsi Abstract Corruption in Indonesia has been categorized as dangerous. The nation's emergency problems faced by the Indonesian state from time to time with a relatively long time span have not been properly resolved, but the perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption are present in this country as invaders who are enemies of all elements of society. In connection with this corruption gave birth to a number of main perpetrators of corruption, one of which was Public Officials. Officials have a strategic role to commit corruption through the authority attached to the position. Their actions can result in national bankruptcy. normative juridical research method. The legal basis for imposing additional penalties in the form of revocation of the right to occupy public positions for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption. In Indonesia, due to the revocation of certain rights only for criminal acts that are expressly stipulated by law that the crime is punishable by additional punishment.
Pro Kontra Pencabutan Hak Menduduki Jabatan Publik Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dewa Rumphas; Nasrullah; Nurlisna; Evi Oktarina
Consensus : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia has been categorized as a dangerous offence. Indonesia is still facing an emergency problem that has not been resolved for a relatively long time. Criminals of corruption will remain invaders and enemies of society. This corruption has given rise to many perpetrators of corruption, including public officials. Officials can commit corruption because of their positions. They can cause the country to go bankrupt. methods of investigating normative jurisprudence. Another basis of the criminal law is the deprivation of the right to occupy a public office for perpetrators of corruption. According to Indonesian law, certain rights can only be withdrawn for certain criminal acts.
Implementation of the Teams Games Tournament Model to Increase Student Learning Motivation in Science Learning at MIN 1 Nagan Raya Nurhalimah; Nurlisna
DEEP LEARNING: Journal of Educational Research Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): OCTOBER 2025
Publisher : MANDAILING GLOBAL EDUKASIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62945/deeplearning.v1i4.279

Abstract

This study aims to increase students’ learning motivation in science learning through the implementation of the Teams Games Tournament (TGT) cooperative learning model at MIN 1 Nagan Raya. The research employed a Classroom Action Research (CAR) design consisting of two cycles, each including the stages of planning, action, observation, and reflection. The participants were 28 fifth-grade students. Data were collected through learning motivation observation sheets, student motivation questionnaires, interviews, and documentation. The indicators of motivation included students’ attention, participation, persistence, enthusiasm, and learning responsibility during science learning activities. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive quantitative and qualitative techniques by comparing the results of motivation scores across cycles. The findings show that the application of the TGT model significantly improved students’ learning motivation. In the pre-cycle, the average motivation score was 61.42% (low category). After implementing TGT in Cycle I, the motivation score increased to 74.18% (moderate category), indicating a positive change in student engagement and participation. Furthermore, in Cycle II, the motivation score reached 87.36% (high category), demonstrating strong enthusiasm, active collaboration, and greater responsibility in completing science learning tasks. Questionnaire results also confirmed this improvement, with the average student motivation response increasing from 63.10% in Cycle I to 88.20% in Cycle II. The study concludes that the Teams Games Tournament model is effective in fostering a more enjoyable, competitive, and cooperative learning atmosphere, which positively influences students’ motivation in science learning. Therefore, TGT is recommended as an alternative learning strategy to enhance student motivation and classroom learning quality in Islamic elementary schools.