Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial LamLaj
Gunardi Lie
Tarumanagara University
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TENAGA KERJA ASING DALAM PELAKSANAAN PENANAMAN MODAL ASING DI INDONESIA Yosia Clementino Moningka; Gunardi Lie; Moody Rizqy Syailendra
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 10, No 3 (2023): NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v10i3.2023.1477-1487

Abstract

Pada tahun 2022, Pemerintah dan DPR mengesahkan Perppu No2. Tahun 2022 Cipta Kerja sebagai respons terhadap fenomena stagflasi yang memaksa untuk dilakukan reformasi struktural yang bijaksana agar dapat memberikan kepastian hukum dan meningkatkan iklim investasi. Salah satu ketentuan yang diubah dalam Perppu Cipta Kerja adalah ketentuan terkait penggunaan tenaga kerja asing yang diperlukan mengisi kekosongan keahlian dan kompetensi di bidang tertentu yang tidak dapat dipenuhi oleh tenaga kerja Indonesia. Untuk itu, perlindungan terhadap tenaga kerja asing diperlukan untuk mencegah pengusaha atau pemberi kerja melakukan pelanggaran terhadap mereka. Penelitian ini akan mengkaji bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap tenaga kerja asing paska pengesahan Perppu Cipta Kerja. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan guna meneliti bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang didapatkan melalui studi kepustakaan. Dari hasil pembahasan didapatkan bahwa tenaga kerja asing telah dilindungi dan mendapatkan kepastian hukum berdasarkan UU Ketenagakerjaan dan Perppu Cipta Kerja melalui rencana penggunaan tenaga kerja asing yang diizinkan oleh Menteri terkait. Namun, terdapat limitasi dalam penggunaan tenaga kerja asing dimana pemberi kerja haruslah mengutamakan tenaga kerja anak bangsa terlebih dahulu ketimbang tenaga kerja asing. Selain itu, terdapat tantangan dalam penggunaan tenaga kerja asing yang harus diperhatikan, yakni era globalisasi dan supply chain antar negara.
The Convertible Note Mechanism and the Risk of Share Dilution: Legal Protection for Minority Shareholders Meily Natassya; Gunardi Lie
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v10i1.217

Abstract

The convertible note instrument is increasingly being used by startup companies to raise early-stage funding due to its flexibility and efficiency, particularly in deferring company valuation until a subsequent funding round. However, despite its convenience, this scheme entails legal risks, especially for minority shareholders. The debt-to-equity conversion process may lead to shareholding dilution and weaken the bargaining position of minority shareholders within the company’s decision-making structure. This journal examines how the conversion mechanism in a convertible note can lead to share dilution risks and explores the available legal protections for minority shareholders against such risks. This research adopts a normative juridical method with a statutory and literature-based approach, analyzing both legal texts and contractual practices. The findings indicate that although Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies recognizes the right of first refusal (pre-emptive right), Article 43 paragraph (3) exempts this right in the context of the conversion of convertible securities into shares. As a result, minority shareholders often lack adequate protection and are vulnerable to ownership dilution. The study concludes that there is an urgent need to reconstruct corporate legal norms in response to the growing practice of debt-based convertible financing. The author recommends that policymakers consider limiting the exceptions to the pre-emptive right and encourage contractual compensation schemes for minority shareholders as a more equitable form of protection within modern corporate structures.
Direct Distribution Regulation by Foreign Direct Investment in the Trade Sector: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia and Singapore Shane Evelina; Gunardi Lie
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v10i1.219

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and compare the regulations governing foreign direct investment in direct distribution activities within the trade business sector, specifically between Indonesia and Singapore. The phenomenon of direct distribution by foreign investors poses challenges for domestic businesses, particularly micro, small, and medium enterprises, as it has the potential to create competitive disparities. In Indonesia, direct distribution activities by foreign direct investment are subject to the provisions of Law Number 25 of 2007 on Investment, which has undergone partial amendments through several subsequent regulations. However, the implementation of these regulations has not fully reflected protection for domestic businesses. Meanwhile, Singapore adopts a more liberal approach to foreign direct investment but maintains oversight mechanisms through specific authorities and administrative requirements for foreign companies. This study seeks to address one key issue: what are the fundamental differences in the regulatory approaches of Indonesia and Singapore toward direct distribution by foreign direct investment? The research employs a normative or doctrinal method with a comparative approach. Secondary data were obtained from applicable laws and regulations, legal literature, and institutional policies in both countries. The findings indicate that Singapore emphasizes ease of market access for foreign direct investment with minimal sectoral restrictions, whereas Indonesia operates within a framework of selective protectionism that lacks consistency. Therefore, there is a need for reconstructing foreign direct investment regulations in Indonesia that are not only pro-investment but also promote economic justice and sustainable national development.
Co-Authors Meily Natassya Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra Shane Evelina Yosia Clementino Moningka