Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP)
Rudiana Rudiana
Universitas Padjadjaran
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Sistem Pemilihan Presiden Indonesia dan Turki Naufal Rizky Albarkah; Wildzar Al Ghifari; Rendy Ramadhan; Rudiana Rudiana
Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol 14, No 2 (2023): JURNAL ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK
Publisher : Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31506/jap.v14i2.21613

Abstract

Indonesia and Turkey are countries that have the same system of government, namely a presidential system of government. Even though they are the same, Indonesia and Turkey have historical differences that have an impact on the implementation of their government systems, especially in terms of holding elections. This study aims to determine the comparison of the presidential election system between Indonesia and Turkey regarding the similarities and differences of the electoral system as well as the election winning strategy of each president in the two countries. This study uses two theories, namely the theory of presidential government systems according to Jimly Ashiddiqie and the comparative government theory put forward by Mariana, Yuningsih, and Paskarina. The method used in this research is normative legal research of a qualitative nature proposed by Johnny Ibrahim using statutory and comparative approaches. The results of this study indicate that presidential elections in Indonesia and Turkey are carried out directly and must be carried out by political parties with a term of office of five years with the minimum age requirement being 40 years and having a threshold, namely Turkey and Indonesia of 5% versus 20%. The strategy for winning presidential elections in the two countries has something in common, namely the existence of Islamic populism which has contributed greatly to winning votes in the presidential election.
COMPARATIVE OF GOVERNANCE IN TERRORISM POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA AND PHILIPPINES Ragil Adi Santoso; Wahdah Hazizah; Muhammad Rizky; Silmy Putri Mahandry; Yuan Veriontina Gathari; Mohammad Ichsan Abdillah; Rudiana Rudiana
Jurnal Kebijakan Publik Vol 16, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31258/jkp.v16i1.8718

Abstract

In Southeast Asia, especially in Indonesia and the Philippines, the issue of terrorism has become a major concern because both countries have a long history of terrorism as well as similar geographical and political characteristics. The main objective of this research is to compare the implementation of terrorism policies in Indonesia and the Philippines. This research is a library research with research subjects in the form of research abstracts, articles, websites, books, policies, and other supporting sources. Data analysis refers to the Van Meter and Van Horn model with the stages of reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The instrument used is analytical and descriptive information management so that the author analyzes, interprets, and combines information obtained from various reading sources. The results show that Indonesia combines the hard approach and soft approach, while the Philippines tends to emphasize the hard approach through military force in implementing its policies. Although both have legal frameworks and supporting institutions, there are still challenges in inter-agency coordination and human rights protection. This research concludes the importance of synergy between stakeholders and improvement of regulations in the implementation of terrorism policies between Indonesia and the Philippines that are more fair and preventive in order to increase the effectiveness of the law without violating human rights.
Co-Authors Mohammad Ichsan Abdillah Muhammad Rizky Naufal Rizky Albarkah Ragil Adi Santoso Rendy Ramadhan Silmy Putri Mahandry Wahdah Hazizah Wildzar Al Ghifari Yuan Veriontina Gathari