Eko Noer Kristiyanto, Eko Noer
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional - Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI Jalan Mayjen Sutoyo Nomor 10 Jakarta Timur

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

REKONSTRUKSI SISTEM PEMILIHAN GUBERNUR DAN PEMILIHAN BUPATI/ WALIKOTA DI INDONESIA Kristiyanto, Eko Noer
Jurnal Penelitian Politik Vol 12, No 2 (2015): Politik dan Kebijakan Publik: Perspektif Teori dan Praktis
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Politik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (290.818 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/jpp.v12i2.539

Abstract

 Local elections are meant to elect the provincial governors and regents/mayors in the district/city. Filling the post of the head of the region at the provincial level is the same as charging regional head office in the city district, which is elected directly by the people. In Indonesia, the enforcement of government embraces the principles of decentralization, deconcentration, and assistance mandate. Deconcentration and assistance mandate are conducted since not all authorities and administration tasks can be performed by using the principle of decentralization. Decentralization is simply defined as delegation of authority. While deconcentration is the delegation of authority from central government to governor as government’s representative in the province. Given the differences in the position of the provincial and district/city as well as the difference between the role of governors and regents/mayors, must the implementatiom of local elections be the same among regions?. This paper explains that the elections in the province should be indirect, on the other hand, direct elections must be maintained at the district/city level. There will be many positive things if these two mechanisms are implemented. These mechanisms also do not contradict to the constitution.Keywords: local government, district head, deconcentration, decentralization. 
Optimalisasi Pedoman Evaluasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Mengatasi Hiper-Regulasi di Indonesia Sujatmiko, Sujatmiko; Wibowo, Willy; Muhaimin, Muhaimin; Yuliyanto, Yuliyanto; Kristiyanto, Eko Noer; Amriyeny, Ulya Fajri; Nurcahya, Dian Nurcahya
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 18, No 3 (2024): November
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2024.V18.221-236

Abstract

Based on data from the Directorate General of Legislation, as of 2024, Indonesia has a total of 52,676 regulations, which include 1,752 Laws, 217 Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws, 4,899 Government Regulations, 2,380 Presidential Regulations, 18,371 Ministerial Regulations, 5,930 Regulations from Heads of Agencies, and 19,077 Regional Regulations. This extensive regulatory framework indicates a trend of hyper-regulation, overlap, ineffectiveness, and ambiguity. The Ministry of National Development Planning/Bappenas encourages ministries, agencies, and local governments to conduct self-assessments through regulatory analysis and evaluation activities. Following this policy, the National Legal Development Agency/BPHN has been designated as the authority to formulate technical policies for monitoring and reviewing Laws, as well as for the analysis and evaluation of legislation as part of national legal development.This study employs a qualitative approach using Merille S. Grindle's policy implementation model. The findings indicate that the implementation of the guidelines for evaluating legislation (Decision of the Head of the National Legal Development Agency No. PHN-HN.01.03-07 of 2019) has been ineffective. Ministries, agencies, and local governments have not utilized these evaluation guidelines in their regulatory analysis and evaluation activities as outlined in the aforementioned decision. Therefore, a policy recommendation for the National Legal Development Agency is to elevate the legal status of the guidelines for regulatory analysis and evaluation from a Head of Agency Decision to a Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights.