Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ADAPTATION OF RELIGIOUS MODERATION: Dispersion of Wasathiyah Islam as the Treasure of PTKIN in Aceh M. Anzaikhan; Syamsul Bahri; Sufrizal Sufrizal
Al-Qalam Vol 29, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31969/alq.v29i1.1242

Abstract

Indonesia is a unitary state that adheres to a democratic system even though most of its population is Muslim. Radical Islamic circles use this reality to shake the sovereignty of elected leaders. As a result, the concept of religion and state ideology often clash through the rise of hoaxes and hate speech. In response, religious moderation is the Ministry of Religion's mainstay program to educate the public so that they are not easily exposed to radical views. The program's seriousness is embedded in various policy rhythms regarding outreach, education, ASN selection, seminars, and research grants at Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri (PTKIN). Under the Ministry of Religion, PTKIN Aceh should follow up on the religious moderation program the Government echoes. In fact, not all Aceh PTKIN academics accept religious moderation in totality, program deviations often occur, where PTKIN claims to be moderate before the Ministry of Religion but is anti-moderation when involved in society. This article belongs to field research with a qualitative approach. The methodology used is a descriptive analysis study with a comparative format for various PTKINs in Aceh. The research locations were IAIN Langsa, IAIN Lhokseumawe, UIN-Ar-Raniry, STAIN Dirundeng Meulaboh, and IAIN Takengon. The research findings conclude that the different forms of implementation of religious moderation between the Government and PTKIN Aceh are due to adaptation and dispersion (deviations). The dispersion of religious moderation in PTKIN in Aceh is influenced by scientific adaptation, leadership authority adaptation, local wisdom adaptation, and political adaptation.
ANALYSIS TA'ZIR PUNISHMENT AND ISTINBATH LEGAL METHOD IMAM MALIK'S PERSPECTIVE Sufrizal Sufrizal; Muhammad Alwin Abdillah; M. Anzaikhan
Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 13, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/dusturiyah.v13i2.19367

Abstract

This study discusses the human ta'zir perspective of Imam Malik. Imam Malik argues that there is no minimum and maximum limit for uqubah / ta'zir punishment. It is well known in the Maliki madzhab, especially Imam Malik, that ta'zir punishment can exceed the limits of had punishment in some conditions and situations. Imam Malik once flogged a man who was found with a boy 400 lashes. Imam Malik's opinion is based on the actions of Umar bin Khatab r.a. where he flogged a man who faked Umar bin Khatab's ring to trick the baitul mal guard, with the aim of taking some of the baitul mal treasures. Caliph Umar at that time whipped him 100 times on the first, second and third day. If accumulated, umar bin khattab whipped the man 300 lashes. If we look at the istinbath method / method of determining the law used by Imam Malik r.a on this issue is to take the fatawa of the companions / mauquf hadith as a conceptual basis for determining the law and leave the Prophet's hadith which expressly prohibits the implementation of the ta'zir punishment beyond ten lashes. It is clearly seen in this problem that the characteristics of Imam Malik and his followers are very respectful of the words and actions of the companions even though at first glance they contradict the text.